chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Akiba Rubinstein vs Richard Teichmann
"Stormy with a Chance of Mate" (game of the day Apr-08-2013)
Mch (1908), Vienna AUH, rd 4, May-07
Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense. Rubinstein Variation (D61)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 59 times; par: 34 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 19 more Rubinstein/Teichmann games
sac: 18.Bxh7+ PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: As you play through the game, you can get the FEN code for any position by right-clicking on the board and choosing "Copy Position (EPD)". Copy and paste the FEN into a post to display a diagram.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Apr-08-13  Travis Bickle: Now that's the way to get a kingside attack rolling!
Apr-08-13  Ezzy: <PawnSac: in case you're interested, here's a picture of the early chess clock>

From <PawnSac's> link -

<By 1883, a mechanical timing device had been invented, called the “tumbling” chess clock. It was first used at a London tournament that year. It was invented by Thomas Bright Wilson (1843-1915) of Manchester, England,>

Invented by a guy from my home city. Didn't know that. You learn something new everyday. :-)

Mar-26-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  Penguincw: Ooh, I like the pun.

Anyway, a Saturday puzzle here. I correctly guessed 18.Bxh7+ Kxh7 19.g6+ Kg8, and then clicked on the solution, happy to get it, without knowing why it's good and all.

Mar-26-16  Exploding: I got 18. ♗h7 right, but that is it.

Really I suck at weekend's puzzles.

Mar-26-16  mel gibson: Difficulty insane?

I saw it straight away!

Mar-26-16  yadasampati: <mel gibson> Not insane but very difficult. Sundays are insane :-)

But i am not surprised that you saw it instantly. Our subconscious mind is capable of solving problems without the "traditional" computations of our conscious mind. In this respect, I would like to refer to Daniel Tammet (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danie...), who can perform amazingly complex mathematical tasks (multiplications, divisions, etc.) within seconds. The solutions just come to him: when he thinks of a number he literally sees a shape in his mind. Combining the shapes in a certain way leads to another shape, that he can associate again with a number, being the solution of the problem ... See "The Boy With The Incredible Brain": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AbA...

I am therefore pretty much convinced that our brains are potentially much more powerful than any current day computer

Mar-26-16  mel gibson: Yadasampati
<But i am not surprised that you saw it instantly. Our subconscious mind is capable of solving problems without the "traditional" computations of our conscious mind.>

I could see that if the King takes the Bishop white can bring his 2 pawns in & threatens an open file for it's h Rook. I have won many games like that by sacrificing a Knight in the same way. Also the Queen can join in the fun after a Knight swap plus a second Rook!

Mar-26-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  agb2002: I know this game.
Mar-26-16  dfcx: My line agree with the text on the first two moves
18.Bxh7+ Kxh7 19.g6+ Kg8,
but next I choose

20.h6 f6 21.hxg7
and black can't do much to defend its h file.

Mar-26-16  not not: 21. h6 is brilliant (looks right and feels right); he gives up another piece to rip into king by exchanging pawns (and win his queen);

did he see it, when he played Bh7, I don't know; fun game to go through though

Mar-26-16  yadasampati: <mel gibson> Thanks for your reply. I would still recommend to watch the documentary in the second link i gave.
Mar-26-16  morfishine: Seen this one
Mar-26-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  alfiere nero: Interesting how the puzzle had similarities with today's game of the day.
Mar-26-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  patzer2: For today's Saturday puzzle, I figured the relatively unprotected black King side gives White a strong and winning attack with the demolition 18. Bxf7+!

I duplicated Akiba Rubinstein's first two moves in the combination with 18. Bxf7+! Kxf7 19. g6+, but after 19...Kg8 I deviated from the game move 20. Nxe4! (+3.34 @ 29 depth, Stockfish 100814).

Instead of Rubinstein's 20. Nxe4! , I went with 20. h4 (diagram below):


click for larger view

Here (diagram above) the computers indicate best play is 20...f6 21. hxg7 Qe6 22. Rh8+ Kxg7 23. Rh7+ (+3.79 @ 18 depth, Deep Fritz 15):


click for larger view

From there (diagram above) my move-by-move look with Deep Fritz 15 continues 23...Kf8 (23...Kg8 24. Rgh1 +5.65 @ 19 depth) 24. Rxb7 Re7 25. g7+ Kf7 26. Nxe4! dxe4 27. Rxe7+ (+6.55 @ 20 depth) with a clearly won position.

P.S.: So where did Black go wrong? The computers indicate 17...a6?, allowing the demolition 18. Bxh7+! (+4.69 @ 42 depth, Stockfish 5SE), was the losing move.

Instead, 17...g6 18. Bxe4 dxe4 19. Nh2! (+1.28 @ 26 depth, Komodo 9.42) puts up more resistance.

Early in the opening, instead of 7...b6 8. cxd5 (+0.37 @ 32 depth, Stockfish 6), the computers prefer the popular move 7... c6 = as in M Rodshtein vs M Roiz, 2015 or the slightly less fashionable alternative 7... h6 = as in Harikrishna vs Eljanov, 2014

Mar-26-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: White forces the position open for attack.
Mar-26-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  Breunor: I went for 18 N x e4 d x e4 and then 19 B x h7 K x h7 and 20 g6 ch. Does this move order fail (my instincts say it does but I don't' see why.)
Mar-26-16  Whitehat1963: What happens if 25...Qe4 or 25...Be4?
Mar-26-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  Breunor: I don't have a computer, but I think on 25 ..... Qe4 there is Qd7., maybe Qh5. On 25 ... Be4 there is probably Qh5.
Mar-26-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: I went for 18.Bg6. Does that win?

I was basing it on an old Jon Nunn game.

Mar-26-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  patzer2: <Whitehat1963> If 25...Qe4, <Breunor>'s 26. Qh5 leads to mate-in-five. The computer pick is 25...Qe5 26. Qxf6 which is good for mate-in-four.

If 25...Be4, <Breunor>'s 26. Qh5 yields mate-in-five.

<offramp> My computer indicates 18. Bg6 loses to 18...fxg6 or 18...hxg6 (-3.20 @ 20 depth, Deep Fritz 15).

Mar-26-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  patzer2: <Breunor> Your 18. Nxe4 dxe4 19. Bxh7+ Kxh7 20. g6+ idea wins after 20...Kg8 21. h6 fxg6 [21...f5 22. Qxc4+ (+3.31 @ 18 depth, Deep Fritz 15)] 22. Nh5! (+4.63 @ 37 depth, Stockfish 6).
Mar-26-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: Thank you, <Patzer2>. Back to my drawing board.
Mar-26-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  Breunor: Thanks Patzer 2!
Mar-26-16  Razgriz: A bit late to the party. Saw the initial 18. Bxh7+, the King would have to take back because otherwise, lets say Kh8 or Kf8, white can just march the pawns down and queen.

However, it was quite tough to follow up on that. I didn't see clearing up the middle by exchanging knights to allow the queen to barge in.

Feb-22-17  Jimmy720: memorize
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
QGD Orthodox Def. Rubinstein Var (D61) 1-0 Attack Masterpiece
from Quickly Perhaps Prickly QG Poked Fredthebear by fredthebear
Game collection: old
by tomo6
shakman's favorite games - 3
by shakman
The Rubinstein Attack
from Play the Queen's Gambit (Marovic) by Chessdreamer
Game 60
from Garry Kasparov's On My Great Predecessors (1A) by nakul1964
Tactical :Rubinstein attack - opposite side castling , K attack
from Learning from Akiba by chessbuzz
Game 60
from On My Great Predecessors 1 (Kasparov) by Incremental
Game 60
from On My Great Predecessors 1 (Kasparov) by Qindarka
16
from Veliki majstori saha 11 RUBINSTEIN (Petrovic) by Chessdreamer
game 4
from Match Rubinstein! by amadeus
Kingside attack with opposite side castling (Rubinstein Attack)
from techniques of positional play by chessbuzz
Queens English
by jungol
Akiba !
from Chess gives joy and insight ......... by arielbekarov
attacking masterpiece
from leo.bulero's favorite games by leo.bulero
Game 100
from Manual of Chess (Lasker) by isfsam
QGD Orthodox Def. Rubinstein Var (D61) 1-0 Attack Masterpiece
from yFredthebear's Roundhouse RUUK Manuevers I by fredthebear
BoardCrusher92 favorite games
by BoardCrusher92
April 1943
from Solitaire Chess column in Chess Review by SirIvanhoe
70a_middlegame SACS Bxh7+!!
by whiteshark


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC