Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Fred Dewhirst Yates vs Akiba Rubinstein
Hastings (1922), Hastings ENG, rd 8, Sep-19
Spanish Game: Closed. Bogoljubow Variation (C91)  ·  0-1


explore this opening
find similar games 19 more Yates/Rubinstein games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If you missed a Game of the Day, you can review the last year of games at our Game of the Day Archive.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
Jun-24-05  halcyonteam: WOW, coolest pawn storm i have seen
Jun-24-05  Shokwave: Yates never saw it coming...he had to be crowing about the fate of the d5 pawn, until he saw those pawns march forward.
Jul-18-07  Karpova: 18.Nf5?! gxf5? 19.Qxg5 Nf6 20.Bh6! (<Threatening Qg5+ and Qg7# while 20.Bg5 Re8 21.Bxf6 Bxf6 22.Qxh7+ would merely win a pawn>) 20...Kh8 21.Bg5
Aug-10-07  euripides: With 11...c6, Rubstein attacks the head of the pawn chain and allows White to inflict a backward pawn on d5 by 12.dxc6, with a formation very like an e5 Sicilian (though perhaps better for Black as White's minor pieces have limited access to d5).

At this date the e5 Sicilians probably had a bad reputation, though they had featured in the Lasker-Schlechter match. Judging from this database, Opocensky (of the Opocensky variation - e5 in the Najdorf) was already playing the Sicilian but not mainly in the e5 form:

search "opocensky sicilian"

So I wonder whether this idea had been played much in the Ruy Lopez, or whether Rubinstein was ahead of his time here.

Aug-10-07  euripides: ... I find that Yates himself tried something similar three years later against Lasker, but under much less favourable circumstances and perhaps only as a desperate measure:

Lasker vs Yates, 1925

Premium Chessgames Member
  plang: The system with 8 d4 is sometimes referred to as the Yates variation as he was the first to use it regularly. 11..c6 was a new move that has now become the main line. The disadvantage of 14..Nc4 is that White can offer the exchange of knights with 15 Nd2 gaining time (Rubinstein apparently recognized this as when the same two opponents reached this position three years later he played 14..Qc7). Yates did not take advantage instead playing 16 Nf1? which led to Black taking over the initiative. 18 Nf5?! was a waste of time; 18 a4 looks more useful. 20..Nf6!? winning the b-pawn was an alternative though the way Rubinstein played it seems more thematic. 22 b3 would have been a tougher defense.
Jun-07-13  Nerwal: 11... c6 is a new move, but the idea doesn't seem to be : Spielmann vs Marshall, 1911. And 11... c5 has also been played before which could lead to the same structure in case of 12. dxc6 : Tarrasch vs A Selezniev, 1923.

This position is discussed in Watson's Secrets of Modern Strategy (p. 113), and is one of many exemples of his bias against the old masters. Statistics are quite questionable as the position was rarely played before 1935 (and the best players then played 11... c6 or at least 11... c5 anyway), and there is also the fact that many modern players tend to repeat previous games irrespectively of the value of the line. More to the point is that classical players like Marshall and Rubinstein pioneered the modern c6 idea and people eventually followed their path, while Keres and Estrin much later still tried the academic plan of ♘e8 preparing f5 without much success. As Kmoch wrote it, played immediately this plan is actually positionally terrible, weakening the light squares and trading white's bad bishop; again Watson discusses a position according to only one specific positional factor, here the pawn breaks offered by the structure of pawn chains, while discarding all the others, and then concludes triumphantly : "there we are, rule independence !".

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
The Ruy Lopez
by chessman95
Attack: pawn storm!
from Art of attack & defense by parmetd
Spanish Game: Closed. Bogoljubow Variation
from SPANISH DEFENSE CLOSED by gambitfan
Rubinstein's Chess Masterpieces
by yesthatwasasac
from Taulbut's How to Play the Ruy Lopez by Pawn N Hand
kcb's favorite games
by kcb
Hastings 1922
by suenteus po 147
haraujo's favorite games
by haraujo
Akiba Rubinstein's Best Games
by KingG
Shaun Taulbut's How to Play the Ruy Lopez
by Cannon Fodder
from Veliki majstori saha 11 RUBINSTEIN (Petrovic) by Chessdreamer
Point Count Chess
by BabalooMoon
how black win RR
from virasakof's favorite games by virasakof
Ruy Lopez
by KingG
Rubinstein's Chess Masterpieces
by Karpova

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC