chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Carl Schlechter vs Siegbert Tarrasch
Tarrasch - Schlechter (1911), Cologne GER, rd 9, Jul-17
Queen Pawn Game: Steinitz Countergambit (D00)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 42 more Schlechter/Tarrasch games
sac: 29.Kf1 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: The tournament is found above the game. For the newest chess events, this information may be a link which takes you to the tournament page which includes other games, a crosstable, discussion, etc.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Jan-13-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: 95...Rg7 allows White to cut off Black's king on the wrong side of the f-pawn. I think Black still has a book draw with 95...Rf1 96. Rf8+ Kg7, etc.
May-27-08  Judah: In fact, Black still had a draw after the 95th move--after all, his King has not really been cut off: White cannot maintain his Rook on the f-file.

The mistake was 98.Rh7+, allowing White to penetrate with ...Kg6 (guarding the f-file from Black's King) and subsequently ...Re5+, cutting the Black King well and truly off.

Necessary was 98.Rf7, putting a crimp in Black's plans by forcing him back to defend the f-pawn.

Sep-22-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  GrahamClayton: After this game, the next game of the match took 109 moves!

Source: Irving Chernev, "Wonders and Curiosities of Chess", Dover Publications, 1974

May-31-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  Chessical: Schlechter achieves nothing from an unambitious opening, and Tarrasch playing vigorously soon equalises. <18...Rc8?> is a blunder overlooking Schlechter's reply, instead Tarrasch had to play <Kf8>. The Knight cannot be taken due to <Qxe6+> winning the unprotected Rook on <c8>.

Schlechter appears to be cruising to victory when he too fails to appreciate an unexpected reply by his opponent.


click for larger view

<28.Nf4?> is refuted by the spectacular <28..Qe4!>. This loses a Knight for three pawns and gives the initiative to Black. Tarrasch needed to calculate this carefully as his King is now exposed, and White has two connected passed pawns on the Queen-side. It is probable that instead of taking the <d> pawn on move 30, Tarrasch would have been better off holding onto his <e> pawn for greater King security.

Schlechter obviously believed that he still had practical chances as he ignored a three-fold repetition on move 38. Tarrasch, however, has the better position.

<38.Rh4> is a straightforward blunder that neither player appreciated at the time, <39.Qb3+> followed by <Rd1> wins Black's Knight.

<54...Qxb2?!> allows Schlechter to obtain K-side initiative with <g4>, <54...Rd5> threatening <Rd2> seems strong.

<57...gxf6?> leads to mate after 58. Qe8+ Kg7 59. Re7+ Kh6 60. Qf8+ Kh5 61. Qf7+ Kh4 62. Re4+ Kg5 63. Qg7+ Kh5 64. Rh4+ Kxh4 65. Qg4 mate)

Tarrasch probably could have held the ending with perfect play, but Schlechter is able to decisively penetrate with his King at the cost of his <h> pawn.

Mar-20-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: <GrahamClayton: <After this game, the next game of the match took 109 moves!>

--> Tarrasch vs Schlechter, 1911

Jul-13-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  Check It Out: 36...Qd3 was a 3-time repetition of position. Was there no rule for that back then?
Jan-07-14  Fanacas: Check it out; yeah there probably was but somebody still has to claim the draw and if nobody claims it you can just play on.
Mar-01-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  Richard Taylor: I analysed this game and both sides made a lot of blunders so that at one stage White was winning then Black then White then Black and so on. At the end Schlecter played correctly but both missed many opportunities to equalise or win...it is a highly flawed game but interesting.
Mar-01-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  Richard Taylor: <Check It Out: 36...Qd3 was a 3-time repetition of position. Was there no rule for that back then?>

There was a rule but the position could be repeated more times than nowadays, I think as much as 5. It was at least more than 3.

Mar-01-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sally Simpson: Hi Richard,

I think you are right. I've seen it said at one time it was 6 moves though I always thought they meant three moves each so it was still 3 fold rep.

Did the Russian rules not state at one time the positions had to run concurrent not on say moves 29,33 and 40 (random numbers picked there) and Petrosian had to accept a draw with Fischer because he was unaware of the FIDE rule.

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
With draw in hand, Tarrasch plays "for the loss" and gets it.
from Instructive rook endings by hought67
Nietzowitsch's favorite games no 1
by Nietzowitsch
13 (f+h)
from 22_R+PP vs R by whiteshark
With draw in hand, Tarrasch plays "for the loss" and gets it.
from Instructive rook endings by beatgiant
With draw in hand, Tarrasch plays "for the loss" and gets it.
from Instructive rook endings by hought67
A A A London System 4 (early c5) [White]
by chess.master
Challenger Schlechter
by Gottschalk
With draw in hand, Tarrasch plays "for the loss" and gets it.
from Instructive rook endings by Nimzophile
R+P vs R
from Endgames in progress by FENfiend
Ending Masterpieces
by syracrophy
Game 9 - "the game of errors" - Lasker.
from Tarrasch v Schlechter - Match 1911 by Chessical
A A A London System 4 (early c5) [White]
by addison13
A Rook and Pawn ending from moves 58 to 106
from Noteworthy Games by BAJones
September, p. 207 [Game 223 / 2259]
from American Chess Bulletin 1911 by Phony Benoni
3:2 --> f+h
from 05a_extra passed a-pawn in R+4:3|| by whiteshark


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC