chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Boris Spassky vs Vasily Smyslov
Bucharest (1953), Bucharest ROU, rd 1, Jan-??
Nimzo-Indian Defense: Leningrad Variation. Benoni Defense (E31)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 26 more Spassky/Smyslov games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Some games have annotation. These are denoted in the game list with the icon.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Nov-10-04  euripides: <Calli> I guess that 19.... Bc8 is part of Black's plan to play ...Qg4 and h4, dislodging the knight; it also protects b7 without allowing Qxa7 (if Rab8) or Qc6 (if b6). Nonetheless, I agree that the whole plan does look rather baroque and slow, as if Smyslov understimated the power of White's central pawns.
Nov-10-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  Calli: <euripedes> Yes, but it seems that Smyslov winds up attacking with only a Queen and a pawn. Okay, the bishop comes in but he is still outnumbered by the white pieces. How could he expect that kind of attack to succeed? Spassky was like 16 years old at the time and may have been taken too lightly. Not after this tourney. He finished tied for 4th-6th in a very strong field.
Nov-11-04  euripides: My initial thought was that establishing the bishop on f5 was sufficient motivation for the h5-h4 idea. But in the game the threat of Ne3 forces the bishop out of f5 almost as soon as it gets there. He might have hoped for Be4 but that doesn't seem to work at any point. So I agree the whole plan looks ropey.

Alexander's notes simply suggest 19...Bc8 was motivated by the fear of f5. If 19...Qe7 20 f5 Qxe3+ 21 Kg1 Qg5 22 Ne4 is interesting e.g. 22...Qe7 23 f6 or 23 Rf4 Be2 24 f6 with a promising attack.

May-26-05  Achilles87: What a blunder
Dec-25-05  shaikh123: if Rxd2 then 35.RG3+, Kh1 36.RH4#
Dec-25-05  szunzein: Hi, this is a brilliant game by Spassky, isn't it? It's amazing that he was only 16
Apr-05-06  notyetagm: One of the comments that the chess program Fritz makes is <Control the center and you control the game, my teacher used to tell me>.

This comment well characterizes the board position in this game resulting after 32 ♖e3.


click for larger view

Apr-05-06  notyetagm: Spassky's swinging f4- and e3-rooks remind me of Ljubojevic's swinging f4- and c3-rooks in the famous Ljubojevic vs Ulf Andersson, 1976.

In that magnificent game, the following position with the swinging White rooks is reached after 24 ♖f4:


click for larger view

The threat in the position is 25 ♗xg7! ♘xg7 26 ♕xg7+! ♔xg7 27 ♖g3+ ♔h6 28 ♖h4#, using the swinging rooks to their maximum effect. The resulting <corridor mate> is shown in the diagram below.


click for larger view

Jan-11-07  sandmanbrig: No hope for black even without the blunder.
Jun-11-08  HNP: What a brilliant game by Spassky! I wonder at what point Smyslov realized that he wasn't the one attacking... Interesting that although Black has a light-squared bishop that is not blocked by pawns, it is White who controls the light-squares owing to his active pieces and control of the centre. Once the knight penetrates to f5, it's all over.
Jan-14-09  WhiteRook48: Yikes! a two rook checkmate in the middlegame.
Sep-29-09  kooley782: Isn't 25.Ne3 playable? I think it seems pretty good for White, considering the rolling passed pawns.
Aug-07-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  kdogphs: SMYSLOV: Yay queen trade!
SPASSKY: Mate in one!
Nov-12-11  Ulhumbrus: 19 Qa4!! denies Black's QB the only good square available to it, the square d7. This suggests that all that in order to place his QB well all that Black need do is to prepare the move ...Bd7. However with the move Qa4 White threatens as well the move f5! cutting Black's QB off from the square d7 and so putting the B on g4 out of play. If Smyslov hopes to place the QB on d7, he has no choice but to withdraw it to c8 before White cuts it off from that square by the move f5.
Nov-12-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: <Ulhumbrus>
How to the tactics work out after <Calli>'s suggested 19...Qe7 20. f5? Can Black then get away with 20...Qxe3+ followed by 21...Qg5 to rescue the bishop? Or even trade the bishop for three pawns with 20...Qxe3+, 21...Bxf5, 22...Qxc3?
Nov-12-11  Ulhumbrus: <beatgiant> After 19...Qe7 20 f5 Qxe3+ 21 Kh1 Qg5 <euripides> has given 22 Ne4 Qe7 and either 23 f6 ie 23 Rf4 Be2 24 f6. On 19...Qe7 20 f5 Qe3+ 21 Kh1 Bxf5 22 Nxf5 Qxc3 White's N should be worth more than three pieces in the middle game, particularly if it is placed well, as on f5 as in this case.

One interesting point is that White's N on f5 defends the d5 pawn. Why? Because the capture ..Qxd5 invites the fork Ne7+

Nov-13-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: <Ulhumbrus>
White's position looks over-extended, and it's not easy to trap Black's bishop, so I'm still skeptical about that gambit.

Among other things, have you checked 19...Qe7 20. f5 Qxe3+ 21. Kh1 <h5>?

Nov-14-11  Ulhumbrus: <beatgiant: <Ulhumbrus> White's position looks over-extended, and it's not easy to trap Black's bishop, so I'm still skeptical about that gambit. Among other things, have you checked 19...Qe7 20. f5 Qxe3+ 21. Kh1 <h5>?> Suppose we begin with 22 Rae1. If Black tries to keep White's N on g3 attacked ( so as to discourage h3) by 22...Qxc3, 23 Ne4 supports with tempo the advance f6.
Nov-15-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: <Ulhumbrus>
19...Qe7 20. f5 Qxe3+ 21. Kh1 h5 22. Rae1 Qxc3 23. Ne4 Qe5, and it looks like the bishop escapes, f6 doesn't accomplish much, and White's center is collapsing. Is this position really worth the two gambitted pawns?
Nov-15-11  Ulhumbrus: <beatgiant: <Ulhumbrus> 19...Qe7 20. f5 Qxe3+ 21. Kh1 h5 22. Rae1 Qxc3 23. Ne4 Qe5, and it looks like the bishop escapes, f6 doesn't accomplish much, and White's center is collapsing. Is this position really worth the two gambitted pawns?> After 24 f6 what do you suggest for Black?
Jan-03-13  bhsakar13556: i have seen some games of spassky. and in many.. opponent suddenly finds himself in an unavoidable mating net.it is just wondering to see a simple position abruptly turns into a nightmare.
Nov-02-15  chaparral: 19. Qe7
20.e4 instead of f5 and sacrifing the e pawn.White has a strong center,that can be use to attack the black King or a future pass pawm
Jan-22-16  peterh99: A typically brilliant game by the young Spassky leading up to a gruesome mate in the middle game. No player has subjected as many top opponents to such bloody fates! I think of Larsen-Spassky with the "here, have a rook" sacrifice. QA4 with the threat of f5 locking in the black bishop seems key.
Aug-13-16  mandor: Is it bad the plan for black :10...a6 with idea of b5, followed by Nb6 and c4?!
May-29-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  Mateo: <Calli: Nxg7 is nice. The point being 33...Kxg7 34.Rg3+ Kf8 35.Rxf7+ Qxf7 (or Kxf7 Qf4+) 36.Qh6+

Anybody else find 19...Bc8 a bit strange? Qe7 followed by Bd7 looks natural.> The move is strange but it makes sense if you consider that White was threatening to play f5 and the Bishop would be badly placed.

search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Game 507
from Max Euwe - From Steinitz to Fischer, Part 2 by demirchess
Game 507
from Max Euwe - From Steinitz to Fischer, Part 2 by Chessdreamer
9
from Boris Spassky's 400 Selected Games by Retarf
Mil y Una Partidas 1950-1959
by K9Empress
HNP's favorite games
by HNP
Game 507
from Max Euwe - From Steinitz to Fischer, Part 2 by FRoeten
Control the centre,you control the game
from gourav27's favorite games by gourav27
More brilliance by Spassky
from layson27's favorite games by layson27
Spassky vs the World Champions Decisive Games
from Spassky vs the World Champions Decisive Games by visayanbraindoctor
Clue #51
from Holiday Present Hunt Solutions: 2017 by Penguincw
Power Chess - Spassky
by Anatoly21
Boris Spassky's Best Games
by hakkepof
9
from Boris Spassky's 400 Selected Games by JoseTigranTalFischer
Game 28
from Golden Dozen (Chernev) by Incremental
6. d5 d6 7. e3 exd5 8. cxd5 Nbd7 9. Bb5 O-O 10. Nge2 Ne5 11.O-O
from 98_E30-E31_Nimzo-Indian Defense: Leningrad Varia by nakul1964
9
from Boris Spassky's 400 Selected Games by jakaiden
Spassky!
by chocobonbon
6. d5 d6 7. e3 exd5 8. cxd5 Nbd7 9. Bb5 O-O 10. Nge2 Ne5 11.O-O
from 98_E30-E31_Nimzo-Indian Defense: Leningrad Varia by whiteshark
spassky centre wins
from greatest chess games by maheshml
Spassky as a teenager
from Ulhumbrus' favorite games by Ulhumbrus
plus 19 more collections (not shown)


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC