chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Vasily Smyslov vs Svetozar Gligoric
Bled-Zagreb-Belgrade Candidates (1959), Bled, Zagreb & Belgrade YUG, rd 26, Oct-25
Indian Game: West Indian Defense (E61)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 71 times; par: 26 [what's this?]

NOTE: You are using our new chess viewer, "Olga." For more info see the Olga Quickstart Guide. You can switch back to the old viewer (pgn4web) from the pulldown menu below. If you have questions or suggestions see our Olga chessforum.

explore this opening
find similar games 41 more Smyslov/Gligoric games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Some games have annotation. These are denoted in the game list with the icon.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
    [help]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
May-30-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  parisattack: David has done a good deed for the chess community by having assembled so much of Bobby's memorabilia in a single - safe - location. And, of course, sharing it with us.

Better in David's fine collection than scattered to the four winds on eBay is my humble take on things.

Yes, there is another much touted Fischer Collection with (apparently) a public display. But compared to David's collection, it is mostly dregs.

May-30-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheFocus: <paris> Agreed. Dregs is right. It is one reason he had nothing to do with the acquirement of said collection.

I didn't see his interview in New In Chess. Did you, or do you have a copy of that issue?

May-30-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  parisattack: I do not get the NIC magazine, Issue? Is it in one of the bound NICs? If so, #? I am four or five volumes out-of-date at this time.

And, yes, you are correct (again!). I was told he had no interest in the material, especially at the price it commanded or was expected to command.

BTW <TheFocus> - I reopened my Forum with the topic, The Future of Chess. I will pass the word to those of possible interest in that discussion.

May-30-11  BobCrisp: <David has done a good deed for the chess community by having assembled so much of Bobby's memorabilia in a single - safe - location. And, of course, sharing it with us.>

Remind me, what was the asking price of his recent <Fischer> tome?

Are we to prostrate ourselves gratefully as the rich man casts us crumbs from his table?

And I'm still asking the question: how much, if any, of his collection originally came from the <Bekins mega-robbery>?

May-30-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  parisattack: I believe the original price for the Fischer tome was $300 when issued a couple years ago. The deluxe edition was more, of course.

Given the nature of the material, the quality of the publication, the production numbers, the work involved I doubt Mr. Delucia made much on the book.

I just don't think it would have come out very well as a Hardinge-Simpole, sorry.

One could always snag a nice 'Chess Magazine Owned by Bobby Fischer' for $100 on eBay, catch a piece of the action.

The answer is still 'If you don't pay your bills, s*&t can happen.'

May-30-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheFocus: <BobCrisp> <Remind me, what was the asking price of his recent <Fischer> tome?>

Well, I paid $330 for my copy. Worth every cent. I have all three of DeLucia's books. Spent over $900 for them.

<Are we to prostrate ourselves gratefully as the rich man casts us crumbs from his table?>

"A prophet is never honored in his own country."

As to the Bekins sale, you do know that Bobby got almost all of that back, don't you? So, don't shed any tears for Bobby's loss. And if DeLucia did buy it, I can't think of anyone better to have it.

May-30-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheFocus: <paris> The NIC issue was earlier this year.
May-30-11  BobCrisp: <Well, I paid $330 for my copy.>

It certainly keeps the riff-raff out.

<As to the Bekins sale, you do know that Bobby got almost all of that back, don't you?>

I know he got some of it back (via <Silman> or <Donaldson>, wasn't it?) but not the degree to which you suggest. It still remains a somewhat murky affair. Did you ever speak to <Bob Ellsworth> about it?

May-30-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheFocus: <BobCrisp> No. have not talked to Ellsworth, nor plan to.

The Bekins affair is a trivial matter to me. Like I say, Bobby got back more than you think.

Perhaps DeLucia did acquire most of it. Bravo for him, I say. From the pictures and inventory in his book, I would say he did. But if so, I am glad one man has it, than for 100 people swapping it back and forth on eBay.

Larry Evans is only recently deceased and you can find his library on eBay being sold to the highest bidder, book by book.

I can understand Bobby being upset, though. I still agonize the loss of two photo books that have been lost. No duplicates.

May-30-11  BobCrisp: <No. have not talked to Ellsworth, nor plan to.>

I phoned him once but he didn't care to talk about it. He sounded very American, though.

<The Bekins affair is a trivial matter to me.>

Trivial matters are important to me.

<Like I say, Bobby got back more than you think.

Perhaps DeLucia did acquire most of it. Bravo for him, I say. From the pictures and inventory in his book, I would say he did.>

This appears somewhat contradictory, unless you're suggesting that <DeLucia> acquired much of <Fischer>'s property after his death.

May-30-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheFocus: <BobCrisp> Although I have e-mailed DeLucia a few times, I never asked him.

It is not often advisable to ask collectors how or when they acquired their holdings.

Plus, I would rather respect his privacy on that matter. I may need to ask for further "borrowings" from him in the future, so I will err on the side of discretion.

It is common knowledge that Frank Brady asked DeLucia if he could look at his collection for <Endgame>.

The echo of DeLucia's "NO!" is still being heard!!

May-30-11  bronkenstein: Does anybody know what was the score of the 1992. ˝secret˝ match ?
May-31-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheFocus: <bronkenstein> No. Only that Fischer won the match.
May-31-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  parisattack: <The echo of DeLucia's "NO!" is still being heard!!>

Same answer I received some years back. I think only AA has actually spent time with that collection.

Jul-24-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  wordfunph: Quote of the Game:

"I felt very bad, because I knew it was a terrible shock to lose with white so quickly. Smyslov is normally a great gentleman, but at that moment he just stopped the clock and left immediately, because he felt ashamed of himself for losing such a game."

- GM Svetozar Gligoric

Source: Modern Chess Miniatures by Neil McDonald

Oct-01-11  jerseybob: In World Chp.events(which this game comes from), I'll stand by what I say: Gligorich wasn't in Smysvlov's league. And that's not to downgrade Gligorich; I'd gladly take his talent!
Oct-01-11  Shams: <In World Chp.events(which this game comes from), I'll stand by what I say: Gligorich wasn't in Smysvlov's league. >

Given that the latter was World Champion, this seems an uncontroversial statement.

Oct-03-11  jerseybob: Shams: You're right, it's not.
Dec-14-11  King Death: < jerseybob:...Gligoric wasn't in Smyslov's league as a player...>

Right. Gligoric was only good enough to make the Candidates 3 different times. Let's see: that's 3 times more than Ulf Andersson, Walter Browne and John Nunn, who weren't too bad as players.

Dec-24-11  jerseybob: You could make a list much longer than just Browne, Nunn and Anderson. Lots of great players haven't made the Candidates. I was simply talking about the performance of Smyslov v. Gligoric in Championship events like Interzonals and Candidates tourneys. Smyslov at his peak had that certain something that Gligorich did not.
Dec-25-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: Smyslov's second-shortest loss in the database. http://www.chessgames.com/perl/ches... The shortest is Smyslov vs Hjartarson, 1995.
Feb-06-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  Marmot PFL: Strange game by Smyslov. if he nothing better than Rc3 by move 16 than it's really looking bad.
Feb-07-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  RookFile: One thing about Gligoric was he was terrific at opening play. The same with Fischer. Evidently, around this time, for whatever reason, Smyslov had not been putting the work into his openings that he might have. He resigns after Gligoric's 18....Bf5. Later, in the same tournament, he had practically a lost game right out of the opening against Fischer.
Feb-07-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: What <jerseybob> said was correct: Gligoric was a formidable player, but not in the class of Smyslov in world title play, though as <King Death> noted, thrice a candidate--no mean feat for a non-Soviet player.
Feb-18-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  plang: 4 dxc?! was weak but Gligoric is especially critical of 9 b4? which led to Black opening the queenside while being better developed. He also gives 13 e3..Nc6 14 Nd5..Nxd5 15 cxd..Ne5 as being a tougher defense but by that time the position was already close to winning for Black.
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
18 moves
from Chess Miniatures, Collection II by wwall
Game 113
from Svetozar Gligoric Collected Games (Leach) by JoseTigranTalFischer
19 e2-e4 leaves f3 behind since g2-bishop defends h3-knight
from Be careful which squares you leave behind by notyetagm
19 Rc1? restricts White b1-queen to b1-h7 diagonal, 19 ... Bf5!
from TRAPPED PIECES: LACK OF MOBILITY, NO RETREAT by notyetagm
Kings Indian Defence, White plays early Bg5
by DHW
Game 80
from I Play Against Pieces (Gligoric) by Qindarka
King's Indian Defense (E61) 0-1 White's Q is trapped
from QThee Queen is Mean Vol. I so says Fredthebear by fredthebear
19 Rc1? restricts White b1-queen to b1-h7 diagonal, 19 ... Bf5!
from Trapped on the edge of the board by notyetagm
Smyslov brevities
by ughaibu
Game collection: 8
by p2c
80 - King's Indian Defence
from I Play Against Pieces by jakaiden
King's Indian Defense (E61) 0-1 White's Q is trapped
from Cats, KIDS playing in the Gruenfelds by fredthebear
Round 26, Game 104 - Worst day in Smyslov's career?
from WCC Index [Candidates Tournament 1959] by Resignation Trap
Queenmate
by sleepyirv
Candidates Tournament, Belgrad 1959 Rd.26
from Favorite Games from (1944-1959) by wanabe2000
King's Indian Defense (E61) 0-1 White's Q is trapped
from 19 and Under League Excludes Fredthebear by fredthebear
Game 113
from Svetozar Gligoric Collected Games (Leach) by Chessdreamer
KID: Indian Game. West Indian Defense
from MKD's KID by MKD
Match Smyslov!
by amadeus
19 e2-e4 weakens the f3-square, allowing a knight fork on f3
from EVERY TIME YOU PUSH A PAWN IT WEAKENS SQUARES by notyetagm
plus 10 more collections (not shown)


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | advertising | contact us
Copyright 2001-2017, Chessgames Services LLC