chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Carlos Bielicki vs Vasily Smyslov
Havana (1964), Havana CUB
English Opening: King's English. Four Knights Variation Quiet Line (A28)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 1 more C Bielicki/Smyslov game
sac: 21...Bxg2 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Some games have photographs. These are denoted in the game list with the icon.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Dec-28-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  patzer2: Correction: For today's puzzle solution 25...h6!! initiates a clever mating attack. If 30. Qxc4, then 30...Rd2 keeps the mating web intact. In the final position, White has no good defense to counter the threat of 31...Rxg3 32. hxg3 <h2 .>

P.S. One purpose of 29...Rc4 (versus an immediate 29...Rg4) appears to be to deflect the Queen and prevent any delays or complications following 29...Rg4 30. R(e)d1.

Dec-28-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: I give myself a D for this one: I missed white's escapt via Kf1 (I thought white had no way to stop the mate after h3). Ok,I did have h3 is the opening move.
Dec-28-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  DarthStapler: I didn't see Rc4
Dec-28-07  UdayanOwen: Actually Johnlspouge, I blundered with my argument for a defensive plan against your puzzle solution....

When checking my analysis by moving the pieces, I found a simple way to bust my defensive plan:

28...h3 29.Kf1 Rde8, and now my suggestion 30.Rad1?? (upon which the whole active defense hinged) loses simply to 30...Qg2+ 31.Ke2 Rxe3 32.Kd2 Qd5+ (this is the move I missed in this line.... bad calculation) 33.Kc1 Rxe1 .

Just so you know, I wasn't specifically aiming to refute your solution, I just thought it was a really interesting and logical way to try and win, and thought it would be a really interesting position to analyze (then I thought my 'defence' made an interesting post).

I spent a fair bit of time to no avail trying to defend the position for white before I settled (erroneously) on the defence based on 30.Rad1??.... I like the smooth logic of the plan for black after 29...Rde8, and if there is a defence that prevents black gaining a winning advantage, it is hard to find.

Of course the game continuation is a much cleaner and stronger way to win, but your analysis is quite creative I think.

Dec-28-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  zenpharaohs: UdayanOwen: "Johnlspouge, your plans were very logical, but I think I may have found an antidote:

After 28...h3 29.Kf1 Rde8"

Actually the antidote to 29 ... Rde8 is probably 30 Qb3.

In that position 30 Rad1 is met with this forcing line:

30 Rad1 Qg2+
31 Ke2 Rxe3+
32 Kd2 Qd5+
33 Kc1 Rxe1
34 f3 Rxd1+
35 Qxd1 Qxd1+
36 Kxd1 Re3

White now is down a rook and two pawns to a bishop, and can either choose between another pawn gone or letting black exchange the rook for the bishop and promotion of the h pawn.

So

29 ... Rde8
30 Qb3 Rd4
31 Rad1 Rg4
32 Rd7 Rxg3
33 Qf7+ Qxf7
34 Rxf7 Rg2
35 Rf3

Black still has a pawn advantage, but white has weathered the storm.

So

29 ... Rde8?

gives away the store.

Dec-28-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  benveniste: Half credit? I missed Rg4 and found:
28. ... h3
29. Kf1 Rc4
30. Qb2 Rd3
31. Bf4 Rdc3

I think this is enough to win, but not nearly as pretty.

Dec-28-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  johnlspouge: <UdayanOwen: your analysis is quite creative>

Thanks (with some embarassment about my hack variation on Smyslov's brilliancy). Smyslov has a marvellously fluent and logical style, and believe me, I would emulate it more closely, if I knew where to begin.

I certainly followed the logic of the position as I saw it. I lack praxis, so the logic did not include the Ph3 as an immediate queening threat. Because Rde1 made progress for me, I had no impetus to find Rg4 and Rxg3 (which I would not have found anyway).

<I wasn't specifically aiming to refute your solution>

Generally, I have two modes in my posts, depending on the leisure time available to me: (1) hasty or (2) ultra-careful. It's quite obvious by now which mode any given post reflects ;O)

Being an optimist, I choose to see your thorough analysis of my (very inferior) possibly alternative winning line as an implied compliment to the care with which I constructed it. I am impressed (as usual) that you found a defense I did not. Although fairly confident, I was most concerned about declaring the Q+5P vs 2R+3P endgame a win for Black.

Black to play


click for larger view

Although I believed the Ph6 ensured the win, I would appreciate any tips you (or anyone else) would care to share about Q vs 2Rs endgames in general, and in my variation specifically. I thought this the weak point in my variation.

Dec-28-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  parmetd: h3 going for the attack forces Kf1. Then white's pieces are too inactive to enjoy that piece advantage. So now Rc4 (if Qxc4 then Rd2 and mate is unavoidable). so Qb2. Then Rg4 pending the eventual h2 threat. I can't figure out a decent white response here.
Dec-28-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  johnlspouge: <zenpharaohs>:

29...Rde8 30.Qb3 Rd4

I have not analyzed in detail but 30...Kh8 follows my so-called positional logic. If my line is going to be hanged, I prefer it be hanged for what it is. I agree Qb3 is better than Qd2 or Qd3. Is it better enough to make a difference against my plan?

Dec-28-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  johnlspouge: Here is a link to the endgame Q vs. 2Rs. It suggests my diagram is a win for the Q, although I have insufficient experience to be sure.

http://www.chesscafe.com/text/muell...

Dec-28-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  zenpharaohs: johnlspouge: "I have not analyzed in detail but 30...Kh8 follows my so-called positional logic. If my line is going to be hanged, I prefer it be hanged for what it is. I agree Qb3 is better than Qd2 or Qd3. Is it better enough to make a difference against my plan?"

I think Qb3 is more than a full pawn better than Qd2 or Qd3. I can give an analysis if you want.

As far as 30 ... Kh8? If that is the move you are suggesting in this position (it's not clear to me that is the case?) That's a bad move because black cannot afford to give white the tempo. For example

30 Qd3? Kh8?
31 Rac1

and white has a slight advantage. Black is supposed to leave a trail of bloody destruction in this problem. But here, white is threatening Rc4 - if that rook gets to the h file then black's attack is finished. A likely continuation is

31 ... f5
32 Rc4 Qg2+
33 Ke2 Rxe3+
34 Qxe3 Rxe3+
35 Kxe3 g5
36 f4 Qxa2
37 Rec1 g4

OK black has buttoned up the king side, but white has a material advantage and the initiative.

There isn't a lot of alternative to that line, and there is no destruction of white either.

So I don't get 30 ... Kh8? at all.

Dec-28-07  Zonszein: I started by 28-Rc4.

Doesn't it win as well?

Dec-28-07  outsider: beautiful and very original sequence
Dec-28-07  znprdx: I was gob-smacked by Rc4, let alone Rg4 which I still can't say I really 'see' as forcing the win - so I'll have to set it up I guess. However I remain curious as to whether capturing the Bishop would still lead to a win, notwithstanding the Qe2 defense. This is a rare gem - it has a unique elegance which is quite overwhelming.
Dec-28-07  willyfly: Black is down by two ♙s but has the move. Right away I notice

27...h3 threatens mate in one and the ♔ must flee.
28 ♔f1 ♖dd4
-if 29 exd4 then ♕h1# or ♕g2#
-if 29 ♕e2 then ♕h1# or ♕g2#

Iím outta time and thatís how it will be for the next two weeks. Very busy this time of year. So, Iíll look now.

-----
At least I had the right start

Dec-28-07  Tariqov: <udayanowen>i think there is a hole in your analysis. After 1.Qxe4Rxe4 the same rg4 is threatened.
Dec-28-07  Tariqov: i definitely saw Qxe4 before i posted, i just didn't want to post all the lines.
Dec-28-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  johnlspouge: <zenpharaohs>: I agree. The extra tempo gained by Qb3 is enough to sink my line. Smyslov really needed the extra theme of queening the Ph6 to win. Thanks for making it clear.
Dec-28-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  johnlspouge: <UdayanOwen>: Good luck with #3. You know what they say about lighting three cigarettes on a single match! ;O)
Dec-28-07  Tariqov: <udayanowen> Oooo... Sorry i thought you meant 30.Qxe4. I somehow didn't see that the white Queen could take on e4.
Dec-28-07  zooter: <Zonszein: I started by 28-Rc4.

Doesn't it win as well?>

An immediate Rc4 does nothing as the black queen can take the rook and come back down to f1 for protecting the g2 square if black plays h3

Dec-29-07  aazqua: That's a really nice puzzle. I saw that rc4 was ok but i didn't get much beyond that. Took me a while to realize why rc4 was necessary to the final solution.
Dec-29-07  Zonszein: Thank you <zooter>, fair enough
Mar-22-14  Strelets: Smyslov never seems to be in a hurry, even in games where he goes on the attack (of which there are quite a few). The pieces just land wherever he wants them to, without any of the shoehorning of a Botvinnik or a Korchnoi.
Oct-25-16  Demna: What is so apparently wrong about 15: ...Nxb4?
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 3)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
28...? (Friday, December 28)
from POTD English by takchess
64idi0t's flank_&_english_3
by 64idi0t
No hurry
from 4 NW 4 NE 4 SW 4 SE Good to Fredthebear by fredthebear
Game 262
from number 3 by Frodo7
My Great Predecessors by Garry Kasparov
by JoseTigranTalFischer
Thu: Smyslov Deflects Q Rc4 + Rg4 with Queening Threat
from Interesting Daily Puzzles by johnlspouge
You wont know till you unravel the complexity
from Esoterica by sevenseaman
25...h6!!
from Mating Attack by patzer2
28...? (Friday, December 28)
from Puzzle of the Day 2007 by Phony Benoni
1014 21.... also pod.
from Sharpen Your Tactics 1000-1125 by Sharpen Your Tactics
Game 114
from GK's On My Great Predecessors Volume 2 Part 2 by Anatoly21
friday dec28
from Selected games from daily puzzles by aroyni
My Great Predecessors by Garry Kasparov
by LionHeart40
Game 114
from On My Great Predecessors 2 (Kasparov) by Incremental
1014 21.... also pod.
from Sharpen Your Tactics 1000-1125 by takchess
Black Repertoire: 1. c4 e5
by libertyjack
Larsker's favorite games
by Larsker
You wont know till you unravel the complexity
from Esoterica by trh6upsz
My Great Predecessors by Garry Kasparov
by Incremental
Capablanca Memorial 1964- Shared 1st with Uhlmann
from Smyslov's Tournaments and Matches 1935-1979 by jessicafischerqueen
plus 11 more collections (not shown)


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2018, Chessgames Services LLC