chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Boris Spassky vs Dragoljub M Ciric
Ch students (1962), Marianske Lazne CSR, Jul-??
Sicilian Defense: Nimzowitsch Variation. Main Line (B29)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 5 more Spassky/D Ciric games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can make these tips go away by registering a free account then visiting your preferences page. Simply check the option "Don't show random tips on game pages." and click the Update Profile button at the bottom.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Nov-12-03  humblespirit: A remarkable defence. spassky shows he is a class above his peers.
Nov-13-03  drukenknight: A very interesting game and I pulled out Evan's book (Modern Day Brilliancies) which uses much of Spassky's own commentary.

THe most interesting part is that Spassky used 60 minutes for move 13 (shades of the Fischer/Spassky match?). Anyhow, he had figured that after 14 Qxp the most obvious move would be 14....Bg4+ 15 Rf3 then he thought either 15...Bg1 or 15....Rd1. (He had figured to block the check w/ R when he was contemplating 14 Bxp)

In fact, w/ a little help from the computer it seems that 15...Qc7 would help black a lot in the 14...Bg4+ line. So the strongest line appears to be:

14...Bg4+ 15. Rf3 Qc7 16. h3 Rae8+ 17. Kf1 Bxf3 18. Nxf3 Rd8 19. Qe5

which seems quite balanced and interesting.

Cirich had already prepared this line at home, but I guess 15...Bg4+ was not in the plan. So Spassky thinking over the board, either on move 13 or move 14 (the notes are not clear) had already found a stronger line than Cirich (and Minich) had prepared ahead of time.

Also interesting that at move 14, Spassky himself was only able to see about 3 ply deep before losing himself in the complications

Nov-13-03
Premium Chessgames Member
  Chessical: <Drunkenknight> I do not understand "Spassky himself was only able to see about 3 ply deep before losing himself in the complications", surely he is winning at move 13? Perhaps he took 60 minutes to see if he could sac his N on f7?
Nov-13-03  drukenknight: you mean 13 Nxf7? yeah, I guess. I was referrring to the fact that he did not consider 15...Qc7 in one of these lines. At what pt. he was looking at that line, was not clear in the comments, although I guess it is obvious that was on move 13.
Nov-13-03
Premium Chessgames Member
  Chessical: <Drunkenknight> Instead of 14...Re8 you propose: 14...Bg4+ 15. Rf3 Qc7 16. h3 Rae8+ 17. Kf1 Bxf3 18. Nxf3 Rd8 19. Qe5 -

But Why play 16.h3? Surely it is better keep up the attack against Ciric's f7 square e.g.:

14...Bg4+ 15.Rf3 Qc7 <16.Nxf7!?> Bxf3+ 17.Qxf3 (17.Kxf3 Rad8 18.Qf5 Qc6+ 19.Kg3 let's Black back into the game) 17...Rae8+ 18.Kd3 Rxf7 19.Qxf7+ Qxf7 20.Bxf7+ Kxf7 21.Bf4 and White is better.

Nov-13-03
Premium Chessgames Member
  Chessical: For a brother to this game see the equally hard fought: Gufeld vs Kavalek, 1962
Nov-13-03  drukenknight: Your line leaves too much material and too many complications on the board, what if black simplifies the position and uses his slight lead in development:

17...Rxf7 18. Bxf7+ Qxf7 19. Qxf7+ Kxf7

Nov-13-03
Premium Chessgames Member
  Chessical: <Drunkenknight> 14...Bg4+ 15.Rf3 Qc7 16.Nxf7!? Bxf3+ 17.Qxf3 <Rxf7> 18. Bxf7+ Qxf7 19. Qxf7+ Kxf7 - leaves Spassky a pawn up with same coloured bishops on the board. I am sure that he would have won.
Nov-13-03  drukenknight: A single pawn? If he is so scared of a single pawn why did he sacrifice 4 pts worth of material? Besides doesnt black have another check coming? Let me set this up again; I've got 2 other ones going on...you do want to continue this dont you...?
Nov-13-03
Premium Chessgames Member
  Chessical: <Drunkenknight>I would also suggest that Spassky played so aggressively in the not immodest or unrealistic belief that he could out-calculate Ciric. Spassky was the then current Soviet champion, and identified as a potential world champion.

I will continue this, but I cannot today (equally unfortunately cannot pretend to the same level of expertise as Spassky).

Nov-13-03  drukenknight: Yes of course; no doubt he outplayed Cirich almost as soon as the game was out of book. The sack itself seems dubious, I am just happy to get the game back to something like equality.

ANother interesting aspect is that Evans says that the innovation was mostly Minich's and he had persuaded Cirich to play it. But then he cites another game from the same year, w/ Minich playing the more sound 12....Nd4+. Maybe he didnt belive his own innovation?

Nov-13-03
Premium Chessgames Member
  Chessical: Minic had played this line before against Vladimir Kozomara, Ljubljana, 1960.

12.Ng5 Nd4+ 13.Kd1 Ne6 14.Bd3 Nxg5 15.Bxg5 Qxb2 16.Kd2 d6 17.exd6 Qb4+ 18.c3 drawn in 40.

It appears to have been investigated Yugoslav circles - Gligoric had played it against Larsen in the 1959 Zurich tournament.

Gligoric vs Larsen, 1959

The Minic game referred to appears to be

Buljovcic - Minic in the 1962 Yugoslav championship in Skopje.

12.Ng5 Nd4+ 13.Kd1 Ne6 14.c3 d6 15.b4 Bxb4 16.Rb1 Nxg5 17.Bxg5 Be6 18.Qd3 d5 19.Rxb4 dxc4 drawn in 37.

The line seems to be gathering dust these days, so perhaps it is worth a try.

Nov-13-03  drukenknight: Yes it's the Buljovic game that is mentioned in Evans' book. The Gligoric game is very interesting, I might try to pick that one up. Any comments on that, chessical?
Jan-23-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  nasmichael: Thanks to <An Englishman>for directing me to this game; it has some great ideas. I will have to revisit this again when I am awake.
Jan-24-05  euripides: This game looks crazy to me, but it may look less crazy to someone who plays the King's gambit as Spassky used to.
Jul-01-05  aw1988: Holy crap, this is frightening.
Jul-02-05  Perkins: I guess Boris stopped playing like that after the 70s. In some touraments, he offers a draw in almost every game he plays. Having lost to Fischer, that alone is a cottage industry, has given him a lovely income over the years.
Aug-09-06  Ulhumbrus: Horowitz included this game in his book "Chess games to remember", and Soltis has included it in his book on Spassky's games.
Apr-26-08  Atking: <drukenknight:14...Bg4+ 15.Rf3 Qc7 16.h3 Rae8+ 17.Kf1 Bxf3 18.Nxf3 Rd8 19.Qe5 which seems quite balanced and interesting.> Why 15...Qc7? isn't 15....Rad8 more logical 16.Qe4 BxRf3+ 17.gxBf3 Qh6 with Qxh2+ or Rd4 But yes a great game from Spassky
Jun-09-09  ToTheDeath: Awesome knife's-edge defense and counterattack by Spassky against a prepared variation.

14...Bg4+ was definitely a better try. Spassky gives 15.Rf3 Rad8 16.Qe4 Bxf3+ 17.gxf3 g6? as winning for White but 17...Qh6! is an improvement giving Black counterplay. Thus White should prefer 17. Qxf3 or 17. Kxf3!? though Black has good saving chances in such a complex position.

Apr-07-15  A.T PhoneHome: Wow... That's a nice ending! After Black moves his Queen away, Bxf6 is destructive.

Spassky was such a strong player... But kudos to Ciric for giving him trouble!

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Spassky!
by chocobonbon
What would you do?
by nasmichael
modern chess brilliancies
by northernsoul
King is traveling
from bitko's collection by bitko
lazintata's_semi_open-french&sicilian
by lazintata
3)e5 in nimzo/rubinstein variation of sicilian
from double-bishop sac by keenostuf
Game 95
from Modern Chess Brilliancies (Evans) by Qindarka
102
from Boris Spassky's 400 Selected Games by Retarf
king in the center? no problem
from fav Anand & Spassky games by guoduke
45
from Spassky's Best Games (Cafferty) by Chessdreamer
Brutal Attacking Chess
by JoseTigranTalFischer
King is traveling
from bitko's collection by Jaredfchess
Good defence can be as exiting and exhausting as attack.
from 22 most instructive games ever played by sydfhd
102
from Boris Spassky's 400 Selected Games by Incremental
Spassky IV
from Chessmaster '86 by SamAtoms1980
Sicilian Nimzowitsched Fredthebear
by fredthebear
Space Invaders
by Gottschalk
Brutal Attacking Chess
by rbaglini
MKD's Sicilian Defense White 2
by MKD
102
from Boris Spassky's 400 Selected Games by JoseTigranTalFischer
plus 2 more collections (not shown)


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC