chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Bent Larsen vs Boris Spassky
Amsterdam Interzonal (1964), Amsterdam NED, rd 22, Jun-19
Bird Opening: Dutch Variation (A03)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 15 times; par: 118 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 41 more Larsen/Spassky games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: The Olga viewer allows you to get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" link on the lower right.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Dec-02-06  Rama: Both Larsen and Spassky were hot in this tournament.

We've seen that Larsen's use of the Bird's was strategical and purposeful. 4. b4 ..., sets up the coming Q-side action. 7. ... c6, is necessary to forestall the advance b4-b5, and then 8. a4 ..., threatens a kind of Minority Attack.

11. d4 ..., blocks the Bb2, but it does much worse things to the black position. At first I did not like 11. ... Ne4, but since ... f5, is always in reserve I can see that the pawn e4 is not all that weak.

The position after 15. Qd1 ..., looks like something that Larsen has prepared in advance. The existence of the move allows the coming 16. c4 ....

The follow-up moves 17. b5 ..., and 19. bxc6 ..., present black with a crisis. Ordinary tactics like 19. ... Nxe3, followed by 20. ... Qxe5, do not work because of 20. cxb7! ..., with the Rb1 ready to support. Spassky's 19. ... b6, is ingenious in that it preserves his Q-side pawn structure, and after 21. ... Qxc6, he regains the material.

22. d5 ..., starts a whole new phase of the game. Somehow, Larsen has spied the e6 square and determines to put his Knight there no matter what the cost. With 24. Nd4 ..., he has it in hand but first makes a series of preparatory moves. When it comes on 31. Ne6 ..., black is reduced to nearly complete passivity. The sequence ending with 35. Nxg5+ ..., shows this clearly.

36. c5! ..., is a master-move. No matter what, white gains access to the checking square a4, and then access to all the white squares in the vicinity of the enemy King.

Black's passivity is now complete. In Zugzwang, he proceeds to wreck his position with pawn advances since his pieces cannot move. White waits until move 52 to play Qe6! which forces the Q-exchange. The threat 54. Nh7 mate, is the point which allows 54. Nxe4 ..., and 55. Nxc3.

But now it is Boris who cooperates with 55. ... Ne4?, which is surely a blunder. After the exchanges, white's pawns regain their mobility and in just three moves it is over -- the e-pawn is going to queen.

Does the presence of 55. ...Rd8, nullify Larsen's masterpiece? Only for chess-theorists. Larsen created the conditions that produced the blunder in the critical game, which in itself is chess of the highest order. Remember, Spassky had obtained 8 points in his last 10 games in this tournament; he was very very tough to beat at this moment.

Dec-06-06  Monoceros: I love the little Ne6+ Kf7 Ng5+ Kf8 dance in this one. It's like a little tempo-generating machine that Larsen uses to get his position ready. Crank it once, Kh2. Crank it again, Kh3...
Apr-24-07  Judah: Tempo-generating? It generates nothing at all.
Apr-24-07  euripides: <52. ... Qh5 53 Ne4 Qf3+ 54 Kh2 and there is no good defense for Rg8.> Here Black could fight on with 54...Qe2+ and if 55.Rg2 Qxg2+ 56.Kxg2 fxe4 when the c pawn is useful; or 55.Kh1 Qf3+ aims for repetition. However, 54.Kxh4 seems to leave Black without any good checks and if 54...Nf7 then 55.Qxf7+ Kxf7 56.Ng5+ and 57.Nxf3 wins a piece.
Aug-20-07  adnol: Hey everyone,

What about

44. Rg7+ for Larsen

Would this be a bad move? It wins him either a queen for a rook and a knight, putting his king in "safety" or otherwise wins him a knight and a pawn, if black doesn't accept the queen lose by Rxe7, Qxe6, although it puts white's king in many many checks and rather a dangerous situation.

What do you guys think about 44. Rg7+ ?

Thanks for all the input

Dec-11-07  mirzafuadi: If 44.Rg7+ Black can hold by simply exchange his Queen with White's Rook and Knight with 44...Qxg7.
Dec-27-07  Riverbeast: A beautiful game from the 'Morozevich' of his day
Jun-28-08  apexin: yes, a very nice game. a classical example of play in this opening (and double bishop sacrifice) is best shown by Lasker vs J Bauer, 1889
Nov-05-08  notyetagm: A *tremendous* win by Larsen using the Bird opening.

If I am correct, this game was played in the very last round of the 1964 Amsterdam Interzonal tournament, with Larsen clinching 1st place due to this win.

Nov-05-08  Eyal: <If I am correct, this game was played in the very last round of the 1964 Amsterdam Interzonal tournament, with Larsen clinching 1st place due to this win.>

The penultimate round, actually. In the final round Spassky managed to win against Quinones (Spassky vs O Quinones, 1964) and make up for this loss, sharing 1st place with Smyslov, Larsen and Tal.

Feb-08-09  veerar: Larsen,a noted,"flank player",lives upto his reputation.His wins against Petrosian are also noteworthy!
Mar-04-09  parisattack: Beautiful 'Play on the Wings' game!
Sep-14-10  Lil Swine: this game actually should be a draw due to three- fold repetition: ( Ne6+, Kf7)
Sep-15-10  Sleeping kitten: There have actually never been more than two repetitions, since positions at moves 43, 46 and 49 were not the same.
Oct-03-10  GRANTZIERER: I submitted a pun for this game: Larenso's oil. Based on the movie Lorenzo's oil which is based on the story of the oldest living case of ALD.
Mar-13-13  Garech: Great game from Larsen.

-Garech

Aug-04-13  leroquentin: 41.Ne6+ Kf7 42.Rg7+ Kf6 43.Qxa7... - There's no way to avoid mate after Qa1+, I supposed.
Jul-19-17  Xeroxx: Pretty smooth win.
Jun-11-22
Premium Chessgames Member
  saffuna: In OMGQ 4 Kasparov quotes Larsen writing about 55...Ne4:

"An amazing misjudgement. After six hours of difficult defense Spassky loses his nerve."

He says 55...Rd8 draws.

Larsen had already qualified for the candidates before this game.

Jun-11-22  Z free or die: There goes <saff> again, never could mind his p's and q's.
Jun-11-22
Premium Chessgames Member
  saffuna: Oh just qiss off.
Jun-11-22  Z free or die: Ha! He mused puizzically.
Jun-11-22
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: Anyone who objects to the foregoing can qiss up a rope.
Jun-11-22  Z free or die: Qromqtly puash this puackery you qukes!
May-22-25
Premium Chessgames Member
  PawnSac: <Judah: Tempo-generating? It generates nothing at all.>

You are right; the Ne6/Ng5/Ne6 "dance" does not generate tempo on the board, but repeating moves is a handy tactic to generate time on the clock. Before move 40 repetition is often used to help the player get to time control. AFTER time control it can still be useful. The attacker can repeat to give himself more time analyzing the position before making a move that is irreversible; permanently changing the position.

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 3)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC