chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Boris Spassky vs Bent Larsen
Palma de Mallorca (1969), Palma ESP, rd 2, Nov-23
Spanish Game: Cozio Defense. General (C60)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 41 more Spassky/Larsen games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If you missed a Game of the Day, you can review the last year of games at our Game of the Day Archive.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Jun-30-03  Bears092: 67...exf6 68. f7, and black will have to give up his queen for the pawn.
Jun-30-03  euripides: Both Larsen and Spassky felt White's pull after 18... Qxc3+ is significant compensation for the pawn even with queens off -no obvious, but 19 Rxc3 Rc8 20 Bd5 seems to win the pawn back. So Larsen keeps the Qs on and tries to win,refusing repetition on move 42 and making good progress - until move 65.
Jun-30-03  drukenknight: for all you theorists out there who disagree on how to count isolated pawns. look at this game.

move 48 spassky is ahead by connected pawns only and he seeks to exchange.

move 50. Larsen still behind in connected pawns looks to check the K. He keeps doing it.

move 56. black has stopped attacking (going for the pin instead) so white looks to attack.

move 57, black sees that white has repositioned so he goes back to attacking, except now something has happened and it doesnt seem to work.

move 59 now white is attacking but he is ahead in material. black blocks w/ Q. Why doesnt white exchange Qs? Because it's not an equal exchange, black will reconnect the pawns and the game will be equal.

Okay so what did Larsen do wrong? THis is not too hard, you dont have to see 10 moves in advance.

Dec-20-04  notyetagm: Too bad Larsen missed this cheapo: 65 ♕c3!? h4?? 66 ♕c8+ ♔h7 67 ♕xe6!, exploiting the overworked blockading Black pawn on f7. The point is that after 67 ... fxe6 68 f7 Black will be down a whole rook for a pawn.

This theme, <exploitation of an overworked blockader>, solves today's daily Chessgames.com puzzle.

May-14-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  Benzol: 65...h4 is the fatal error 65...♔h7 would have been more circumspect.
Apr-28-06  McCool: Nice ending.
Apr-24-11  notyetagm: Game Collection: BLOCKADERS DO *NOT* PROTECT SQUARES (OVERLOADED)

Spassky vs Larsen, 1969 67 Qc8xRe6! 1-0 Black f7-pawn blockades White f6-pawn from f7-square

Apr-24-11  notyetagm: Game Collection: BLOCKADERS DO *NOT* PROTECT SQUARES!!!

Spassky vs Larsen, 1969 67 Qc8xRe6! 1-0

S Volkov vs Yifan Hou, 2008 61 Nd5-b6! 1-0

Topalov vs S Zhigalko, 2008 39 Rd1xd5!!

Jan-05-14  clement41: In a tactics book I saw this position, except that the white rook was on f1 instead of f2. And white still wins, although black can resort to a last trick: Qc8+ Kh7 Qxe6 fe f7 h3 now of course queening loses to Qxh2#. Thus f8=N+ forks queen and king 1-0
Jan-05-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  Caissalove: Presumably Larsen was playing for a win and so didn't state his intention to play 54.....Qd1+ and repeat the position a third time and thereby claim a draw?
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Sierawan Bears092
from gourav27's favorite games by gourav27
zengames ll
by zentovic
"Winning the lost game"
from Spassky The Legend by CharlieLuciano
The Ruy Lopez
by chessman95
167
from Chess in the USSR 1945 - 72, Part 1 (Leach) by Chessdreamer
"Winning the lost game"
from Spassky The Legend by SantGG
Pawn's worth a queen
from Yasser Seirawan's Winning Chess Tactics by Bears092
Pawn's worth a queen
from Yasser Seirawan's Winning Chess Tactics by nakul1964
67 Qxe6! since the Black f7-pawn blockades the White f6-pawn
from BLOCKADERS DO *NOT* PROTECT SQUARES! BDNPS! by notyetagm
P.94 in Yasser Seirawan's book Winning Chess Tactics
from Prom Dates Play Chess All Knight at FTB's Place by fredthebear
Passed Pawn
from book lesson games by Halfpricemidge
Pawn's worth a queen
from Yasser Seirawan's Winning Chess Tactics by MKD
white lends his queen to promote an anxious pawn
from champs vs champs by kevin86
Spanish X$ Plus Fredthebear's C60s & C70s
by fredthebear
Pawn's worth a queen
from Yasser Seirawan's Winning Chess Tactics by nakul1964
p.94
from Games in Seirawan's Winning Chess Tactics by Pawn N Hand
Palma de Mallorca 1969
by Tabanus
PerpChck to loss
from Game collection: T by c65win
67 Qc8xRe6! f7-pawn cannot defend e6-rook, blockade f7-square
from OVERLOADED! by notyetagm


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC