Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Bent Larsen vs Boris Spassky
"When Pawns Attack" (game of the day Sep-15-2016)
USSR vs. Rest of the World (1970), Belgrade SRB, rd 2, Mar-31
Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Modern Variation (A01)  ·  0-1


Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 124 times; par: 31 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 41 more Larsen/Spassky games
+ sac: 12...h4 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Premium members can suggest a game for Guess-the-Move with the Guess-the-Move Suggestion Queue.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 9 OF 11 ·  Later Kibitzing>
May-31-12  LoveThatJoker: Guess-the-Move Final Score:

Larsen vs Spassky, 1970.
Your score: 47 (par = 32)


Aug-29-12  Everett: <offramp: Pawns can move in 5 different ways. In this game the h-pawn does 4 of them... In all my many years I have never come across a game where a single pawn has made all five different moves...>

What an interesting and cool observation. To make the possibility even more difficult, you can add capturing on both diagonals.

This gets me thinking. Is there a game out there that has every single possible chess rule expressed in it? I'm guessing no, if only because four promotions in one game are nigh impossible to find, but the game would have to have the following:

-Castling on opposite wings
-The prevention of castling at certain moments
-Rooks moving in all four directions of different lengths -Bishops moving in all four directions of different lengths -Queens moving as bishops and rooks above
-Knights moving in all directions
-Pawn moves as <offramp> listed above -Finishes in mate or stalemate (can't be both, but this can perhaps be shown in a variation) - etc.

In this game, one would not learn that rooks can move horizontally, or that queens can move like a rook, or that bishops can move backwards, or that k-side castling is possible, etc. It's an interesting find to catch a game that fulfills as many rules as possible... I wonder in how few games we kibitzers can demonstrate all the rules at the board...

Jul-03-13  leka: Dear DrMal after 11..Rxd2! a Houdini move.Please give us a deeper analysis move moves how the black can win.Let us check this 11...Rxd2!? 12.Knightxd2! Be3 13.Qc3?! Rd8 but where is the black win.All the people give us the computer analysis the moves after 11...Rxd2
Jul-03-13  RookFile: White's play was bad, there's no other way to say it. He starts out with an extra move, and by move 11 we're arguing over which is the best winning move for black. It is so bad that white has the problem that black usually has - a lovely queen's bishop that has a pretty view, but actually does nothing.
Sep-03-13  Lambda: <This gets me thinking. Is there a game out there that has every single possible chess rule expressed in it?>

Expressing checkmate, stalemate, the 50 move rule etc. in the same game would be difficult.

Sep-05-13  Kinghunt: Just as an interesting comment on how far engines have come... Stockfish finds 14. Rh1! in literally less than a second.
Sep-14-13  MarkFinan: Without even attempting to read any of the 9 pages of comments first (Well its late, and ive just penned an ode to an LM!) i think 9.f4 is terrible. Ive only been through the game once, although i have before a few times, but Im really surprised Larsen didnt quit chess immediately after the game, haha! Well in my patzing opinion this is atrocious from white, I know this games a classic, popular, well known, and it takes two players to make a great game, but thats why i dont think it is a great game....One of the participants played so so sooooo poor, and black did what you would expect of any self respecting super GM. Pounce on the blunders, and made his opponent pay. :-)
Oct-28-13  Baura: I was living in Italy when this game was played in nearby Yugoslavia. I went down to the local chess club the day after and someone had the game score, and was going over it on a board surrounded by local players. I recall the feeling that Spassky's moves looked like optical illusions.
Oct-28-13  Isilimela: Great game by Spassky. But what on earth did Larsen think he was doing with Nf3, d4 , c6. As indicated by <Dr Mal> all he did was swap a piece that moved 3 times for one that moved once ?? And opened the d file for good measure.The position after 7 ... Bf5 just looks plain uncomfortable for white.
Premium Chessgames Member
  PhilFeeley: Can we at least agree that 1. b3 is a questionable opening? I played it once against a much weaker player than Spassky, but that's not saying much. Anyone of Spassky's strength should be able demolish white quite easily, especially if the player is supposed to be an expert in the very opening they are playing!
Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: <PhilFeeley: Can we at least agree that 1. b3 is a questionable opening? >


Premium Chessgames Member
  PhilFeeley: Sadler did much better with it here:

Sadler vs Kudrin, 1988

I guess he had the cooperation of his opponent.

Mar-20-15  vrusimov: No opening can survive bad analysis, bad piece placement and bad tactical awareness. 1. b3 in the hands of an experienced and tactically astute player can put a player in a spot of bother...Baadur Jobava, a 2700 level player comes to mind. Questionable opening? Even Fischer deployed this opening on occasion. You don't destroy a player "quite easily" just because of the opening. That's puerile-amateurish thinking actually. You do that because you are a superior player, which Spassky was.
Mar-20-15  1d410: The opening is not questionable. It's just like playing black with a convenient fianchetto getting started.
Mar-20-15  Petrosianic: I think Mednis lists the five "Perfect" first moves c4, d4, e4, g3, and Nf3. b3 he lists as "Near Perfect".

White's opening play is dubious, but it starts to g bad after Move 1. Opening up the d file for Black, opening himself up with f4, et cetera.

Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: It was to Larsen's credit that he rebounded after this crushing defeat to inflict his redoubtable opponent's sole loss of the year upon him: Spassky vs Larsen, 1970.
Mar-20-15  Everett: <Sep-03-13 Lambda: <This gets me thinking. Is there a game out there that has every single possible chess rule expressed in it?> Expressing checkmate, stalemate, the 50 move rule etc. in the same game would be difficult.>

True. Did you have anything to add to the last question I asked?

Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: <Everett: <offramp: Pawns can move in 5 different ways. In this game the h-pawn does 4 of them... In all my many years I have never come across a game where a single pawn has made all five different moves...>...To make the possibility even more difficult, you can add capturing on both diagonals.>

That is a good concept. Is it possible, though?

Yes! But only just.

Double move (2) single move (1) normal capture (1) to the left, ep capture (1) to the right and promotion (1). That's 6 squares, second rank to the end.

It would make a superb "Excelsior" problem!

[The last promoting move could also be a capture; so there is some leeway!]

Mar-20-15  Everett: <offramp> I look forward to your creation!
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sally Simpson: Hi Offramp.

Saw your post and recalled a piece I wrote many many years ago about hero-pawns.

Remember your Morphy (and I think of very little else.)

The White e-pawn...

click for larger view

....and what else would you expect from Morphy.

Does the double move 1.e2-e4

Captures to the left 15.exd5

Takes enpassant 19.dxc6

Advance one square (giving check!) 20.c7

Takes to the right and promotes to a Queen. 21.cxd8.

Morphy vs Hart, 1854

And of course there is always

M.Mattos - A.Obendorfer from the Uruguayan Championship of 1997 (surprised this game is not one here!)

The White e-pawn via an en passant promotes with checkmate.

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.Bc4 Nc6 4.d4 exd4 5.e5 Ne4 6.0-0 Bc5 7.Re1 f5 8.exf6 d5 9.f7+ Kf8 10.Bd3 Bf5 11.c4 h6 12.cxd5 Qxd5 13.Bxe4 Bxe4 14.Qe2 Bxf3 15.Qe8+ Rxe8 16.fxe8Q mate.

Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: Geoff, that Morphy game is brilliant! That pawn does everything.
Nov-05-15  mcgee: And the finish we were denied: 14...Bxe3 15 fxe3 Rh1 16 Rxh1 g2 17 Rf1 Qh4+ 18 Rf2 g1Q+ 19 Bf1 Qxf1+ 30 Kxf1 Qh1+ and mate follows. Maybe the elusive knight, bishop, rook and queen sac game at the highest level will still occur in my lifetime. I hate the computer for seeing this though.
Feb-12-16  dehanne: The natural outcome to a double hole opening.

Teichmann would be proud.

Apr-17-16  hadynthepadawan: It seems as like Larsen missed 12...h4! As Najdorf commented on Spassky's play..."When Spassky offers you a piece, you could just as well resign right there".

But then maybe Larsen considered to play a few more moves, so that we chess lovers could grasp Spassky's point, that all the black pieces are coming through the h-file into the heart of white's position. Awesome play by the 10th World Chess Champion.

Sep-15-16  JohnTal: I get a kick out of seeing a GM play a pet move and seeing him get squashed over the board as Spassky does to Larsen. b3 playable? Not -- though I know Fischer played it a few times in the 70s.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 11)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 9 OF 11 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
47* one of the best known games of recent years
from notable Chess games by DanBoyle
from 200 Modern Brilliancies (Wicker) by Chessdreamer
Game 1
from Max Euwe - From Steinitz to Fischer, Part 1 by Chessdreamer
Good games ought to know
by EvgeniyZh
Unexpected decoy
from games of brilliant attack and sacrifice by tacticalmonster
Game collection: 157
by yellowpebble
Deviation sacrifice allows lethal pawn intrusion attack
from MJCB favorite games by MJCB
Boris Spassky's Best Games
by brucemubayiwa
clifton's favorite games
by clifton
Larsen just HAD to play on Board One
from micahtuhy's Top Ten of All Time by micahtuhy
10. BORIS SPASSKY (1969-72)
from World Champions' Best Games by Sui Generis
Waiting for Fischer.
from Attack and Defence by hoodrobin
Rook sacrifice is used to gain tempo.
from cookiearm's gallery of tactical masterpieces by cookiearm
January 8: When Pawns Attack
from Game of the Day 2007 by Phony Benoni
Chess Network Videos: Part 3
by Penguincw
Game 78
from On My Great Predecessors 3 (Kasparov) by Qindarka
Larsen vs Spassky !
from One has to have at least two plans .... by arielbekarov
The James Bond Attack, Russia vs. Rest of the World - Board One
from Games of Unsurpassed Beauty by micahtuhy
JohnO.O's favorite games
by JohnO.O
Favorite Former World Champion
from Favorite Games by Favorite Players by FairyPromotion
plus 424 more collections (not shown)

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC