Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Rudolf Spielmann vs Alfred Moewig
Coburg-A (1904), Coburg GER
Vienna Game: Vienna Gambit. Paulsen Attack (C29)  ·  1-0


explore this opening
find similar games 1,204 more games of Spielmann
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
Premium Chessgames Member
  luzhin: Spielmann plays the opening terribly. Black has to try really hard to lose this game. Exchanging his fantastic fianchettoed king's bishop on move 32 was especially perverse.
Sep-03-06  euripides: <luzhin> a very interesting game. I'm not sure White's position in the early middle game is all that bad; although Black has a passed pawn, white's pawns seem to have more mobility, and White's knight seems more effective than either of Black's bishops. I wonder if this game interested Spielmann's friend Nimzowitsch.
Sep-03-06  euripides: ... on reflection I notice Black was a pawn up. Yes, I guess he should not have lost this ...
Premium Chessgames Member
  luzhin: Euripides, Black should have won it! For a start, he could have played 27...Ra3 threatening Bxb3 with devastation. Obviously White can defend b3 in the short term, but Black will follow up with a5,a4 opening up White's king's defences like a tin of sardines.
Sep-03-06  euripides: <luzhin> <27...Ra3> 28 Bd2 Qb5 29 Nc3 or 29 Qb2 is not at all clear to me.

I think that White always had some positional compensation for the pawn, and that Black basically lost through playing on the wing where White was stronger.

Premium Chessgames Member
  luzhin: Euripides, I think White's only compensation for the pawn was the fact that he was Spielmann. And after your suggestion of 28.Bd2 in response to my idea of 27..Ra3, did you see that Black has the shot 28..Bh6(!)? If White then plays 29 Bxh6 the game might continue 29..Bxb3 30.Qb2 Rxa2 31.Qxa2 Bxa2+ 32.Kxa2 Qa4+ 33.Kb2 Qb5+ 34.Ka1 Qxe2 with a decisive material advantage. This is not all forced, but serves to demonstrate that it was not Black's game plan of attacking White's king that was at fault, but the manner in which he carried it out.
Sep-03-06  euripides: <And after your suggestion of 28.Bd2 in response to my idea of 27..Ra3, did you see that Black has the shot 28..Bh6(!)?> I didn't consider that. But 28 Bxb4 looks good enough to me.

The basic problem here, I think, is that Black has only three pieces in the attack; White has all five pieces (apart from the king) defending. If Black could get his black-squared bishop in on the act, things would chnge: but I don't see a way, provided white is aggressive enough in chasing the black pieces. I don't think BLack's attack is well founded.

Premium Chessgames Member
  luzhin: Euripides, I'm sorry. For some reason, while playing the game in my head, I had visualised White's King on c1, in which case the Bd2 would be pinned to the c1-h6 diagonal. Please disregard my last note. Of course Black's choice of 27..b6 was an attempt to open up the position for his two Bishops, but it seems wrong on principle to denude his own King of its protective carapace.
Sep-03-06  euripides: <luzhin> no problem ! I agree 27...b6 is suspect.
Oct-21-10  muwatalli: spielmann played this Qf3 variation twice in 1904 and both games he obtained terrible positions out of the opening! the other game was this one
Spielmann vs Duras, 1904
you would think he would be the better prepared in a fairly rare gambit variation of his choice, in this game 6. Bb4 is recommended/best, in the other 8 Qg3 is recommended with a good game.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
94_-> Middlegames with opposite-coloured Bi~
by whiteshark
zz85#__How to get away with Checkmate otb
by whiteshark
Hauptturnier A (Saturday, July 23)
from Coburg 1904 by Phony Benoni
from Vienna Gambit, knight exchange by dustinkinney

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2018, Chessgames Services LLC