chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Rudolf Spielmann vs Alfred Moewig
Coburg-A (1904), Coburg GER
Vienna Game: Vienna Gambit. Paulsen Attack (C29)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 1,224 more games of Spielmann
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can display posts in reverse order, by registering a free account then visiting your preferences page and checking the option "Display newest kibitzes on top."

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Sep-03-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  luzhin: Spielmann plays the opening terribly. Black has to try really hard to lose this game. Exchanging his fantastic fianchettoed king's bishop on move 32 was especially perverse.
Sep-03-06  euripides: <luzhin> a very interesting game. I'm not sure White's position in the early middle game is all that bad; although Black has a passed pawn, white's pawns seem to have more mobility, and White's knight seems more effective than either of Black's bishops. I wonder if this game interested Spielmann's friend Nimzowitsch.
Sep-03-06  euripides: ... on reflection I notice Black was a pawn up. Yes, I guess he should not have lost this ...
Sep-03-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  luzhin: Euripides, Black should have won it! For a start, he could have played 27...Ra3 threatening Bxb3 with devastation. Obviously White can defend b3 in the short term, but Black will follow up with a5,a4 opening up White's king's defences like a tin of sardines.
Sep-03-06  euripides: <luzhin> <27...Ra3> 28 Bd2 Qb5 29 Nc3 or 29 Qb2 is not at all clear to me.

I think that White always had some positional compensation for the pawn, and that Black basically lost through playing on the wing where White was stronger.

Sep-03-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  luzhin: Euripides, I think White's only compensation for the pawn was the fact that he was Spielmann. And after your suggestion of 28.Bd2 in response to my idea of 27..Ra3, did you see that Black has the shot 28..Bh6(!)? If White then plays 29 Bxh6 the game might continue 29..Bxb3 30.Qb2 Rxa2 31.Qxa2 Bxa2+ 32.Kxa2 Qa4+ 33.Kb2 Qb5+ 34.Ka1 Qxe2 with a decisive material advantage. This is not all forced, but serves to demonstrate that it was not Black's game plan of attacking White's king that was at fault, but the manner in which he carried it out.
Sep-03-06  euripides: <And after your suggestion of 28.Bd2 in response to my idea of 27..Ra3, did you see that Black has the shot 28..Bh6(!)?> I didn't consider that. But 28 Bxb4 looks good enough to me.

The basic problem here, I think, is that Black has only three pieces in the attack; White has all five pieces (apart from the king) defending. If Black could get his black-squared bishop in on the act, things would chnge: but I don't see a way, provided white is aggressive enough in chasing the black pieces. I don't think BLack's attack is well founded.

Sep-03-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  luzhin: Euripides, I'm sorry. For some reason, while playing the game in my head, I had visualised White's King on c1, in which case the Bd2 would be pinned to the c1-h6 diagonal. Please disregard my last note. Of course Black's choice of 27..b6 was an attempt to open up the position for his two Bishops, but it seems wrong on principle to denude his own King of its protective carapace.
Sep-03-06  euripides: <luzhin> no problem ! I agree 27...b6 is suspect.
Oct-21-10  muwatalli: spielmann played this Qf3 variation twice in 1904 and both games he obtained terrible positions out of the opening! the other game was this one
Spielmann vs Duras, 1904
you would think he would be the better prepared in a fairly rare gambit variation of his choice, in this game 6. Bb4 is recommended/best, in the other 8 Qg3 is recommended with a good game.
Aug-25-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: Interesting exchange 13 years ago between <euripides>, who sadly is not around any more, and <luzhin>, who is still going strong, luckily.

27....Ra3 28.Bd2 Qb5 29.Nc3 Qa6 (threatening ...Bxb3) is interesting. If 30.Qb2, then 30...Qd3+ 31.Rc2 Bxd4! 32.Qxa3 Bxc3 33.b4 Bf6 34.Qxd3 Rxd3 seems to give Black more than enough for the exchange.

If 30.d5, at extended search depths (80 minutes, 41 ply) my SF seems to like slow continuations like 30....Rd7 31.g4 Kc8, with an evaluation hovering around -2.0.

At move 27, incidentally, at slightly over two hours (44 ply; this is a complicated position), my SF's top choices are 27....Kc8 (-2.04); 27....Bf6 (-1.98); and 27....Ra3 (-1.94).

luzhin was right that Black definitely should have won the game, but <euripides> was right that White had many resources.

In the game, after 27....b6?! 28.cxb6 Qxb6 29.d5?!, Black had 29....Rxa2! and if 30.Qxa2 Qxe3 Black again has ample compensation for the exchange.

29....Qb7?! 30.Bf4? (30.Nf4 is better) 30....Rd7 31.d6 cxd6 32.Nd4


click for larger view

As <luzhin> pointed out, 32....Bxd4 was a terrible move. Instead 32....Bd5 is about -3.4 (35 ply, with 33.Nb5 Be5 34.Bxe5 dxe5 as the main line -- White doesn't have anything to oppose to Black's central preponderance), and 32....g5?! 33.Bxg5 e3 is about -2.0.

After 34.Qc3


click for larger view

It begins to look like the latter stages of AlphaZero vs Stockfish, 2018. Black falls apart a lot more quickly than Stockfish. After 35....a6 36.Ra4 it's basically hopeless, and after 38.Rb4! mate is forced.

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
zz85#__How to get away with Checkmate otb
by whiteshark
Hauptturnier A (Saturday, July 23)
from Coburg 1904 by Phony Benoni
EXCEPTION
from Vienna Gambit, knight exchange by pawn2knight
EXCEPTION
from Vienna Gambit, knight exchange by dustinkinney
94_-> Middlegames with opposite-coloured Bi~
by whiteshark


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC