chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Emanuel Lasker vs Wilhelm Steinitz
Lasker - Steinitz World Championship Rematch (1896), Moscow RUE, rd 14, Dec-29
Spanish Game: Exchange. Keres Variation (C68)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 49 times; par: 156 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 45 more Lasker/Steinitz games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To flip the board (so black is on the bottom) press the "I" key on your keyboard.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Jun-15-05  Knight13: Good endgame play by White. He keeps the rook to support the pawns to go up the board with the King. These endgames are studiable! (Is studiable a word?) Good game.
Jun-15-05  arielbekarov: <Knight13> You are right that this game is excellent for studying the endgame. The games that I know of between these two giants in their fighting about the WorldChampion title are very educative for all parts of the game. These games are like a testimony for us to benefit from.

I couldn't find 'studyable' in my dictionnary, but let's make a word of it. What about the spelling 'studyable'?
You agree?

Nevertheless, thank you for focusing on this great game and good luck to you in your own chess-career!
Ariel

Jun-15-05  Knight13: <arielbekarov> I think studiable is better. But studyable is okay, too. And thanks for your comments. :)
Oct-20-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: Here is the position after 55. Rd2 as given in Fine's Basic Chess Endings, diagram 362, p. 355:


click for larger view

The simplest draw, according to Fine, was 55....Re3 (55....Rxd2+? loses immediately) 56. Rd4+ Kc5 57. Rd3 Re2+ 58. Rd2 Re3 59. Rf2 f4! 60. Kb2 Rg3 61. Ka3 Kb5 62. Kb2 Kc5! 63. Kd1 Rxb3 64. Rxf4 Rg3 65. Rf2 Kc5 66. Ke1 Kd6 67. Kf1 Ke7=.

55....Re4 56. Rf2 Rg4 57. Kb2 f4! 58. Kc2 Kc5! 59. Kd3 Rg3+ 60. Ke4 Rxb3 61. Kxf4 Kd6 62. Re2 Rb8 was also good enough to draw, but Steinitz's 57....Re4? was not: 58. g3! Re5 59. Rf4+ Kb5 60. Ka3 Rd5 61. Rf3 Ka5 62. b4+ Kb5 63. Kb3 Kc5 64. Kc4 Kc6 65. Rb3! Re5 66. b5+ Kb6 67. Kd4 Re4+ 68. Kd5 Re8 69. Kd6 Re1 70. Rf3 Kxb5 71. Rxf5+ Kc4 72. g4 and White won.

Jan-05-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  Chessical: Steinitz having won the previous two games perhaps saw this as his last chance in the match. He was prepared to play sharply and take his chances, hence the <11...c4> accepting the inherent weakening of his K-side, instead of castling but reducing the tension in the position.

Lasker develops an initiative, but this suprisingly fades

<41.Rd6+> seems very strong (using the combined threats of Nd8+ and e6+) 41...Rg6 42.b4 (the Rook has too few squares) 42...Rg4 (to stop a4) 43.a3 Bc8 (if 43...Rc4 then 44.Nd8+ wins the Bishop) 44.e6+ wins.

Lasker seems to have have the endgame edge in this match, and in the ensuing endgame, Steinitz appears to have missed several opportunites to draw.

<55...Re3> (R.Fine) seems a cast iron draw - e.g. 56.Rd4+ Kb5 57.Rd5+ Kb4 58.Rd3 Re2+ 59.Rd2 Re3=; but even after this Steinitz is not lost.

<57...Rg5> 58.Rf4+ Kb5 59.Kc3 Rxg2 60.Rxf5+ Kc6=; or;

<57...f4> 58.Kc2 (58.Rd2 Rg3 59.Rd4+ Kb5 60.Rxf4 Rxg2+ 61.Kc3 Rg3+ =) 58...Rh4 59.Kd3 Kxb3 60.Ke4 Rg4 61.Kf3 Rg8 62.Re2 Kc3 63.Re4 Rg3+ 64.Kf2 Rg4 65.Ra4

<63...f4> 64.gxf4 (64.g4 Rd4 65.g5 Rxb4+ 66.Kc2 Rc4+ 67.Kd3 Rc5 68.g6 Rg5 =) 64...Rd4 65.f5 Rxb4+ 66.Kc3 Ra4 67.Kb3 =.

<70...Kxb5?> seems to be the tipping point past which only his opponent making a mistake could save Steinitz. <70...Re4+> would have probably lost eventually but would have been more inconvenient for Lasker.

The end is: <78.Re7> Ra6+ 79. Re6 Ra5 80.g7 Rf5+ 81.Ke7 Rg5 82.Kf7 Kf5 83.Rf6+ Ke4 84.Rg6

Jan-05-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: In my note below I left out 63. Kc2 Kb5 and also got the page number wrong -- it's p. 335.

<Chessical> 41. Rd6 does indeed look winning to me, though I haven't looked at it with an engine.

In your line beginning with 57....f4 you diverge from Fine by capturing the pawn on b3 with the king rather than the rook, which seems counterintuitive. In your line, does 61. Kf5 (rather than 61. Kf3) 61....Rh4 62. Kg5 help White?

62...Rh2 63. Kxf4 Rh8(?) 64. g4 Rf8+(?) 65. Kg3 Rg8 66. Rd2 looks like a book win. But what if 64...Kc3? Then 65. g5 Kd4(?) 66. Rd2+ wins, and so, I think, does 65....Kd3 66. g6 and 65....Rg8 66. Re2.

Jan-05-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <chessical> 63....f4 is a neat idea. But can White play 64. gxf4 Rd4 65. f5 Rxb4+ 66. Kc2(!) Rc4+ 67. Kd3 Rc8 66. Kd4, when 66....Kc6 loses to 67. Rc3+?

I thought Black might be able to draw by shifting the rook between e5 and d5, but 63....Re5 64. Kc3 Rd5 65. Rf4 Re5 66. Kd4! looks winning.

Jan-05-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <chessical> 70....Re4 isn't check, unless I have the board set up wrong. Is 71. Rxf5 Rg4 the idea? I think White can win after 72. Rf3 Kxb5 73. Ke5 Kc5 (73....Kc4? 74. Rf4+) 74. Kf5 Rg8 75. g4.
Jan-05-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  Chessical: <Keypusher> thank you very much for your detailed comments.

Firstly, <70..Re4> is only a check due to a typo. I believe that Steinitz is completely lost at this point, and taking the pawn just loses. Actually, it does not really matter. True, Steinitz could use the Rook to harass Lasker, but his only real hope was for a rare nervous error by Lasker, and then perhaps a very lucky draw. Looking again, I have to admit that this would have been very unlikely, the winning technique being rudimentary for Lasker, for example:

<70...Re4> 71.Rxf5 Rg4 72.Rf3 Rb4 (<72...Kxb5> 73.Ke5 Rg8 should be a White win once the White King gets ahead of his passed pawn and uses his Rook to seal the opposing King off along the <f> file) 73.Ke5 Rg4 74.Kf5 Rg8 75.g4 Rf8+ etc...

I believe I am on firmer ground, however, in sytating that <63...f4> holds up as a defence, e.g. <64.gxf4> Rd4 65.f5 Rxb4+ <66.Kc2> (<keypusher>) <Kc5> 67.f6 (<67.Kd3> Rb3+ 68.Ke4 Rxf3 69.Kxf3 Kd6 is a draw) 67...Rb8 68.f7 Rf8 which is a draw

Finally, in the line starting <57...f4> (Rather than 57....Re4 as Steinitz played) the Black Rook is on <h4> and cannot capture on <b3> - (my apologies if I have misunderstood you).

Jan-05-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <Chessical> You appear to be absolutely right that 63...f4 draws. What a nice defense!

What I said <In your line beginning with 57....f4 you diverge from Fine by capturing the pawn on b3 with the king rather than the rook, which seems counterintuitive> was not clear at all. I was referring to the line in the second paragraph of my original post on this page, which I copied from Basic Chess Endings.

The line begins <55....Re4 56. Rf2 Rg4 57. Kb2 f4! 58. Kc2>


click for larger view

Fine's analysis continues 58....Kc5 59. Kd3 Rg3+ 60. Ke4 Rxb3 61. Kxf4 Kd6 62. Re2 Rb8 with what looks like a book draw (because the black king is only two files away from the pawn).

Your line continues <58...Rh4 59.Kd3 Kxb3 60.Ke4 Rg4 61.Kf3 Rg8 62.Re2 Kc3 63.Re4 Rg3+ 64.Kf2 Rg4 65.Ra4>so you capture the pawn at b3 with your king, while Fine uses the rook. I thought 61. Kf5 might be an improvement for White in your line.

Jan-06-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  Chessical: <Keypusher> I agree that Fine's analysis is the most accurate approach, <55....Re4> 56. Rf2 Rg4 57. Kb2 f4! 58. Kc2 <Kc5> 59. Kd3 Rg3+ 60. Ke4 Rxb3 61. Kxf4 Kd6 62. Re2 Rb8, and as you observe "with what looks like a book draw (because the black king is only two files away from the pawn)".

Yet, from the above line, does a divergence at move 58 with <...Rh4> necessarily lose for Black? I think the position may still be defensible:

<58...Rh4> 59.Kd3 Kxb3 60.Ke4 Rg4 <61.Kf5> (Keypusher) Rg8 62.Kxf4 Rf8+ 63.Kg3 Rg8+ 64.Kh2 Kc4

"A ,<b>/<g> pawn on the second wins if the enemy King is cut off by five files" Euwe and Hooper 'A Guide to Chess Endings',(Dover) p.147. Here we have only 4 files separation.

<65.Rf4+> (<65.g3> Kd5 66.Rf4 Rh8+ 67.Kg2 Ke6 68.Kf3 Rb8 69.g4 Rb3+ =) 65...Kd5 66.g4 Ke6 67.Kg3 Rh8 68.g5 Ke7 69.Kg4 Rf8 70.Ra4 (<70.Rxf8?> Kxf8=) 70...Kf7 71.Ra7+ Kg6 72.Ra6+ Kg7 =

Jan-13-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <Chessical> Looks like you are right again, 61....Rg8 is a draw. Thanks, this has been very educational!
Jun-07-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: <Chessical: <Lasker develops an initiative, but this suprisingly fades <41.Rd6+> seems very strong (using the combined threats of Nd8+ and e6+) 41...Rg6 42.b4 (the Rook has too few squares) 42...Rg4 (to stop a4) 43.a3 Bc8 (if 43...Rc4 then 44.Nd8+ wins the Bishop) 44.e6+ wins. >>

I'm astounded how quick the black position collapses after <41.Rd6!! Rg6 42.b4!>


click for larger view

All white pieces work in harmony together, whereas the black pieces don't.

Aug-08-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: Chessnote # <3847. ‘Lasker’s greatest blunder’> is reporting about 2 different versions of white's 50th move (i.e. 50.Rd8/50.Rd1).


click for larger view

<50.Rd8> is it, of course!

http://www.chesshistory.com/winter/...

Aug-08-08  Boomie: After 55...Re3, if white tries 56. Rf2 Rxb3 57. Rxf5 is a tablebase draw.


click for larger view

However after 56...Rxb3 white wins with 57.Rf4+ Ka3 58.Rxf5


click for larger view

So black can't take the pawn on b3 yet. He is saved by 56...Rc3+ 57.Kd1 Kxb3 (Rxb3 works, too)


click for larger view

This means 56.Rf2 doesn't work.

56.Rd4+ goes nowhere as black has Re2+ waiting. As the other rook moves lead down the same path, the position is a draw.

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
Game #94
from John Nunn's Chess Course by Incremental
Rook vs Rook
from Endgames World champions - part one by Alenrama
game 10
from 28b_Meister der Turmendspiele (1890-1914) by whiteshark
41
from Veliki majstori saha 7 LASKER (Petrovic) by Chessdreamer
Ruy Lopez -- Exchange Variation
by Turbine2k5
The Ruy Lopez in World Championship Matches
by frogmanjones
Game #94
from Lasker JNCC by chestofgold
Match Steinitz!
by amadeus
lasker best games
by brager
R + pawns - drawn with 4 files of separation
from Chessical's Instructive Endgame Collection by Chessical
masterful endgame give Lasker an 8-2 lead
from World Champions A-Z part 2 Lasker by kevin86
Lasker vs the World Champions Decisive Games
by visayanbraindoctor
it's the spirit ... that counts
from 96b_The Unbearable Lightness of rook endgames 2 by whiteshark
Game 14, Lasker leads 8-2 (10-4)
from 1896-1897 World Chess Championship by Penguincw
Steinitz has now been on the losing side of three of these...
from Marathon WC games by rcs784
Game #94
from John Nunn's Chess Course by vantheanh
What memorable games these two giants were playing!
from Chess teaches us to learn from our mistakes! by arielbekarov
Rook vs Rook
from Endgames World champions - part one by brucemubayiwa
Match Lasker!
by amadeus


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC