chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Wilhelm Steinitz vs Samuel Tinsley
London (1899), London ENG, rd 22, Jun-28
French Defense: Advance Variation. Paulsen Attack (C02)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 2 more Steinitz/Tinsley games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If you missed a Game of the Day, you can review the last year of games at our Game of the Day Archive.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
May-17-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  profK: Whoops missed something___22 Re2!. I played the advanced Variation 3.e5 for 20 yearsm and I believe that 5...f6 is the best for Black.
Mar-19-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  KEG: Tinsley for once played the opening decently, but then played a faulty combination on his 16th move that lost the game immediately.

Unlike profK, I am not fond of 5...f6 in the Advance Variation of the French Defense (the more normal 5...Qb6 or 5...Bd7 or even 5...Nge7 all seem much better), but 5...f6 is certainly playable and had nothing to do with Tinsley's defeat here. In fact, when Steinitz played 6. exf6 (instead of the far superior 6. Bd3) Tinsley got the better of the opening and maintained his advantage through his 15th move.

The Tournament Book criticizes Tinsley's 14...Nb4 as a loss of time, but the move looks fine to me. True, the Knight can be chased away by White with 16. a3, but White also loses time in having to move his Bishop and also loosens his Queen-side pawn structure. All in all, I like the move.

Tinsley's 16...Bxh2+, however was simply a blunder. He apparently thought he would obtain a good attack for the piece with 19...Nc2 20. BxN RxB, but overlooked Steinitz' 20. Re2!! winning immediately. In fact, and as the Tournament Book notes, Steinitz could have won even without this resource (e.g., 20. Rf1, though not as decisive as 20. Re2!!, would have refuted Tinsley's combination).

Tinsley's desperate 20...Nxe3 was crushed by Steinitz' 21. Qd3. In fairness, however, the game was past redemption after 20. Re2.

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
French Advance Paulsen Attack (C02) 1-0 Insufficient preparatio
from T Players Tease Fredthebear by fredthebear
London 1899
by suenteus po 147
London 1899
by JoseTigranTalFischer
French Advance Paulsen Attack (C02) 1-0 Insufficient preparatio
from The t_t Players: Staunton, Steinitz & Zukertort by fredthebear
Uncommon Openings
by Sudgon
Uncommon Openings
by Morphischer


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC