chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Arturo Pomar Salamanca vs Laszlo Szabo
Hoogovens (1967), Beverwijk NED, rd 4, Jan-14
Benoni Defense: Four Pawns Attack. Main Line (A69)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 4 more A Pomar Salamanca/Szabo games
sac: 24...Rxe5 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Nov-25-02  drukenknight: Drunk's Brew of the Day. Another Kings Indian. This time I am going to discuss the late middle game first since the strategic principles of time/space that are found at the end are really a continuation of the what happened at the beginning.

Play the first 15 or so moves out rapidly and then see what happens. Black manages to wedge his B deep into enemy territory. He has managed to gain some sort of time/space advatage from this, where white has gained some space on the k side. Can white turn this space into anything important? Maybe not.

Eventually blacks B will manage to pull pawns forward in order to queen, then he sacks the R turning the space advantage into more tempo.

The moves that lead to the end game are pretty nice too. A good practical example of a blockader piece in use. So look at moves 21 through 30 or so. That is where white is finally finished off.

This opening variation was apparently something like 15 to 20 moves deep depending on which line you had memorized. Zaitsev had authored an article on it, based on a game w/ Priydovsky, where Pri. was black and played 15...f5

in the line played in this game (15...Bd4+), Zaitsev was suggesting the continuation with 21...f5 but of course Szabo didnt read the article and he came up with 21...Nb6. it was probably off the top of his head, just sitting there staring at the chess board and probably a better move than the one Z. had come up with.

Anyhow this move 21...Nb6 appears to work because black can answer Bxd6 w/ Nxd5, because the e pawn is pinned to the R; the R is loose and not protected.

WHich brings up the whole question of what is the R doing on e3 in the first place but that that will have to wait for now.

Anyhow I guess Pomar just didnt really worry about the pin and played 22 Bxd6. However, he could have broken the pin essentially by playing 22 R(3)e1

at least I think so. Play the position for awhile and you may see the play sort of revolve pts. e..g d6 and d3. Perhaps white can get an advantage by simply pushing the e pawn through. My theory of chess would tell me that there is some relationship here between time/space here as first one side has the move, they gain some space; then they turn it over.

What if black tries to break up the King side pawns? Does it lead to anything?

Now on 23 R(3)e1 Evans says "The only interesting course is 23 RxB PxR 24 P-B5 (24 PxN? RK7+)" Hmmm now HE wants to sack! Is everyone just sack happy?

On 24...Rxe5:

"Hey Sneaky look at that! a Rook for 5 pawns by drunk count. Looks like Szabo subscribes to the same theory as me."

On 26 Ra3 it looks like something stronger was called for like either: clear the e file of pawns or trade down the N for the passed pawn.

On 28 Nb3 Evans doesnt like it suggests trading down R for B ( 28 RxN BxR) and taking his chances on the end game.

It doesnt look good, white looks toasted.

Apr-22-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  zanzibar: <drunkenknight> calls this a KID, and I found a contemporaneous Chess Life (which Google books thinks is CL&R from 1966):

http://books.google.com/books?id=2J...

SCID classifies it as E77 (KID-Four Pawns Attack) until 9.cxd5, then switches to A68c (Benoni-Four Pawns), calling it main line until 11.a4

The old article actually does quote Zaitsev as <drunken> does, citing Zaitsev-Priyodovsky 1965.

Apr-22-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: Modern Benoni by transposition--my old foe Joseph Fang always played the Four Pawns from either the KID or Modern Benoni move order. Never once saw him try 8.Bb5+ or Mikenas' 8.e5 vs the Benoni.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
1967 Beverwijk Hoogovens
by jww
Game 28
from Modern Chess Brilliancies (Evans) by Qindarka
benoni
from benoni and benko gambit by mathlover
Szabo verus the four pawns attack in the Benoni.
from Laszlo Szabo - underappreciated brilliance. by themadhair
modern chess brilliancies
by northernsoul


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC