Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Mark Taimanov vs Artur Yusupov
"Hitting the Mark" (game of the day Aug-26-2007)
USSR (1980)
Nimzowitsch-Larsen Attack: General (A06)  ·  0-1


explore this opening
find similar games 2 more Taimanov/Yusupov games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Help with kibitzing features can be found on our Kibtizing Help Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
Aug-26-07  brainof7: Why sac the rook? i dont get it... There isn't really a way for black to just outright win in this position, and if it was done because of "Touch Move" or bieng blindfolded that would be a really poor GOTD
Aug-26-07  syracrophy: Nothing interesting about this game. Looks like Taimanov put himself in that losing position
Aug-26-07  psmith: <brainof7> The threat is R8a2+ followed by Qa3+. What do you suggest instead of Rxf7+.
Premium Chessgames Member
  al wazir: White lost because he allowed 25...d4. It has to be a pretty shabby opening for white when neither of his center ♙s get past the third rank until the 25th move, and the c- and f-♙s don't even move. Didn't he ever hear about control of the center?
Aug-26-07  patzerboy: This was a Reti opening. You know, that hypermodern jazz about controlling the center without pawns.


That said, I think White's biggest mistake was that misguided kingside strategy starting with 8.g4. Castling queenside just as Black was about to open the a-file didn't help, either.

Aug-26-07  jmrulez2004: if white didnt sac the rook..its mate yo...
black would move Ra2+
Black:Qa3+ and its baa baa over..
white had to check/// even though..its already a lost position:D
Aug-26-07  CapablancaFan: The Reti has always been a suspect opening to me b/c there are just simply too many ways for black to achieve equality. That being said, I think white's fatal mistake was 17.O-O-O. 17.Nf3, 18.Kd2 for example, keeping the king in the middle had to be tried. Why would you put your king next to the file that's being opened up? Alot of players play on auto-pilot and have this idea that "they must castle" every game. Here castling actually killed white.
Aug-26-07  Rodrigo Gutierrez: I agree: 8. g4 was a bit too optimistic and 17.0-0-0 close to suicidal; but 21. Cc3 allowing black to play 21... Ba3 was probably what condemned white to such an early death. I guess as such this is a nice example of Jon Speelman's theory that it takes three bad mistakes for white (or two for black) to lose a game.
Aug-26-07  Monkey King: 21. Nc3 seems to be a blunder.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Chessmensch: Everyone says it differently but the sum of it is terrible play by white from start to finish. Black was able to take so much initiative it was like he was playing white with the black pieces.
Aug-26-07  belgradegambit: <Monkey King: 21. Nc3 seems to be a blunder.> Totally agree. Whites play was poor but without Nc3?? there isn't an obvious winning plan for Black.
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: A scary fork diverts the queen-for one move!
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
doubled rooks attack pawn picker in the woods.
from Great Games of Yusupov by Dillinger
So nicht
from 98_A01 Play 1.b3! by whiteshark
Game of the Aug-26-07
from Games of the day 4 by Herkus
64idi0t's uncommon_&_flank
by 64idi0t
August 26: Hitting the Mark
from Game of the Day 2007 by Phony Benoni

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2018, Chessgames Services LLC