chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Mikhail Tal vs Alexander Kazimirovich Tolush
USSR Championship (1958), Riga URS, rd 1, Jan-??
Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation. Gligoric System (E53)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 3 more Tal/Tolush games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Nov-19-04  Flyboy216: What the?

Crafty gives a +4.90 for 25...♘xc6 (which I thought was the right response, although admittedly my Elo is probably -40), and a forced mate for the text response. What was Tolush trying to do...?

Nov-19-04  Marco65: I saw 25.Nxf5 wins a piece. No need to "sacrifice like Tal" here.

<erikcu> After 25.Nc6 the black queen is threatened

Nov-19-04  tacticsjokerxxx: At first glimpse Nxf5 was my choice, but after looking at Nc6 you realise that works too. typical Tal move.

however after 25. Bxc6 does Tal need to activate the rook to win, I think..

Nov-19-04  Marco65: 25...Bxc6 26.Qxf7+ Kh8 27.Qf6#
Nov-19-04  tacticsjokerxxx: Ok... i was only looking at 26.Bxf7+
Nov-19-04  ongyj: Hi chessgames.com! Probably Erikcu was thinking of giving up the Queen for a Rook and Bishop 25...Bxb3 26.Nxb4 Bxd1 but with 27.Qxe7 it seems that White is overwhelming with material, isn't it?
Nov-19-04  admiralnemo: put me down for 25.Nxf5. The other winning line is just too complicated for a numbskull like me :)
Nov-19-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: If CRAFTY says that his line puts you ahead 5+,I'm takin' it to the bank.

<admiralnemo> shouldn't your name be "admiralNIMOY"? HA HA! I see you went for the most LOGICAL solution!

Nov-19-04  admiralnemo: <kevin86> I've thought of that, maybe I was unconsciously urged to pick my avatar because of the phonetic similarity between "nemo" and "nimoy". The actual creative process went as follows, however. 1.Anonymous 2.Latin for "no one"= "nemo"3.Captain Nemo 4.Admiral Nemo 5.Spock Avatar with actor coincedentally named Nimoy
Nov-19-04  Saruman: Yes! got both 25.Nc6 and 26.Nxf5!
Nov-19-04  delterp: The difference between 25) Nxf5 and 25) Nc6 is enormous. I would consider the former a 'Botvinnik' move and the latter a 'Bronstein' move. Myself, being fully in the Bronstein camp, feel chess should be played for beauty. The mundane Nxf5 wins material and puts white in a winning position. Nc6 however simply wins.
Nov-19-04  Shubes82: looked at Nc6 first. Couldnt follow it through. Knew it was stong because it threatened the queen and the knight on e7. Couldnt see a sure win though. Followed Nxf5 all the way. What after 28) Bxf7 though?? 28)...Rxf7 is obvioulsy a loss because of 29)Re8+. So that leaves 28)...Kh8. Now the white bishop is pinned and the black queen has control of the long dark diagonal and also threatens a back rank mate. Maybe 29)Qh5 or g5 looks plausible too. Any thoughts on how it would finish from that point?
Nov-19-04  Shubes82: Per my last comment, do you think Tal saw this line and chose Nc6 because he wanted a quick kill?
Nov-19-04  Shubes82: I think that its great you play chess for beauty, but i feel your contradict yourself. A winning position is a win, plain and simple. I think the statement chess should be "played for beauty" is trite and i couldnt disagree with it more. Chess should be played to win, as Bobby Fischer conveyed best. Beauty and art are biproducts of a desire to play the best game of chess possible. My opinion is that youve watched Searching for Bobby Fischer one too many times. Nxf5 is a strong play, and everyone who saw it should pat themesleves on the back. We should continue to play our mundane chess, because it looks like we'll have many wins to come. Best if luck on your chess beauty, delterp.
Nov-19-04  drukenknight: I think you misunderstand the context in which that phrase is used, Shubee.

THe old US player, Santasiere was of that opinion. That you had to play moves for beauty and/or creativity. At least as white. He abhorred the thought of memorized lines.

Because he was playing chess by a theory, an algroithm in his own head. That says "dont do just what it says to do, play what you know to be the best move always."

YOu have to understand at what pt. in the game we are talking about. Sant. woudl probably laugh in your face if you suggest he play Damiano def. or BUdapest. He's not crazy.

But there are times in the game when you KNOW that you have the guy beat, because he obviously has missted it, but you can play a pretty good move, or you can really calculate it out, and you come to find...the move that looks pretty good would probably beat this guy but..and the move I calculate really doesnt win that I can see....

say he has 2 minutes left on his clock, you are up say R for N and you have a pretty good attacking going on his K. And there is one little thing you sort of overlooked but the guy is a dingaling he's never gonna see it in amillion years, and he's so worried about losing that rook pawn he will do something desperate on the a file to stave off mate and w/ 2 minutes left, he wont be able to calculate the stunner move.

SO what do you do?

YOu see. He is talking about a concept like that. The idea of playing in theory and playing "over the board." I.e. practical.

Nov-19-04  drcdwil: <aw1988> Sorry if I overreacted. And it only took me 3.2 seconds to do so! <tpstar> yeah, I have boys ages 8,6,5 and 2. And I do like hearing of their modest (so far) accomplishments. Only the 5 year old is interested in chess.
Nov-19-04  Skylark: I was looking at 25. Nxf5 Nxf5 26. Bxd5 as the win. ie

26. ... any move other than h4 or Kf8
27. Qxf7+ Kh8
28. Qf6#

26. ... Kf8
27. Qxf7#

26. ... h4
27. Qxf7+ Kh8
28. Qf6+ Kh7
29. Qxf5+

When white wins the knight with check, and checkmate or a huge loss of material can't really be avoided.

I guess I was barking up the wrong tree though. :(

Nov-19-04  erikcu: Yeah I spent some time on it. giving up the black queen is just as bad. It just drags the game out longer.
Nov-19-04  Shubes82: Two things...

In response to Skylark, I believe youre evaluation was a little narrow. 26)...Rf8 takes care of the threat on f7 momentarily. White still comes out a piece up, but there is no forced mate yet. Also did anyone look at the rest of the game to see where black went wrong? Would anyone else give 22)...f5 a ?! notation? I feel as though it was a fruitless attack on the queen and gave access to the crucial dark central e5 square, where it cannot be attacked by the bishop. It is also two knight moves from attack and cannot be defended by another pawn. Anyone else agree with this?

Nov-19-04  pkjohn146: <drcdwil> I suppose now would be a bad time to tell you I solved it in 1.3 seconds? Hah-gotcha, just kidding. <aw1988> good for you, keep at it! Sounds like somebody is really upset because they didn't figure it out as fast. Oh well. The other puzzles this week were, for me, easier than this one. I got the first couple of moves, but that was about it.
Nov-19-04  samvega: <Shubes82>
In an earlier post, another kibitzer commented:
<23.Qxf5 Re8 24.Qb1 Nf4 -- is that the motive behind 22..f5? (And if white declines the pawn, as in the game, it screens h7 against a bishop-queen battery)>
Nov-19-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  crafty: 28. ... ♕xb2 29. ♕xb2 ♔e8 30. ♕h8+ ♔d7 31. ♕xa8 ♗xf5 32. ♕d5+ ♔c7 33. ♖e7+ ♗d7 34. ♕xd7+ ♔b8 35. ♖e8#   (eval Mat07; depth 10 ply; 10M nodes)
Apr-09-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  Domdaniel: Meanwhile, many years later (I got it! In, lessee, about 29,433 hours ... or 105,958,808.23 seconds, to be precise. How's Kasparov doing as champion these days?)

Winning method aside, this game features one of the most beautiful unheard melodies of all time: a combination entirely in the notes, never actually played. But Tal had it all worked out.

If Tolush had grabbed the b-pawn with 19...Nxb4 (depending how deep you look, you might think there's enough counterplay to get away with it, between pins, deflections and mate threats. But here's the game position after 19.Be5 ...


click for larger view

... and off we go ...

19 ... Nxb4
20.Qxb4 Bxf3
21.Re1 Bb7
22.Bxf6 Qc6
23.Bxf7+ Kh8

[23...Kxf7 24.Qe7+ is mate in 3]

24.Bxg7+ Kxg7
25.Bd5 Qxd5
26.Re7+

["with an irresistible attack" - Tal]

26 ... Kf6 [others are even worse]
27.Qh4+ Kg6

[Black can struggle on hopelessly after 27...Qg5 28.Re6+! winning the Queen]

28.Qxh7+ Kf6
29.Qg7+ Kf5
30.g4+ Kf4
31.Qf6+ Kxg4
32.Rg7+ Kh5
33.Rh7+ Kg4
34.h3#

Exquisite. Of course 34.Rh4# is also quite strong.

Jan-10-10  msmith5: Nice game by Tal; he seems to drum an attack out of nowhere starting on about move 18.

Where do you think Tolush went wrong?

My thoughts were:
1) Perhaps passing up the option to trade queens on move 13?

2) Perhaps 17...Bb7? I want to play 17...Be6 here, and now either 18. Ng5 Qd6
18. Qe5 Qc7
18. Rd1 Nc7
All three of which appear to hold, and I can't find a way for white to rip open black's kingside.

Sep-06-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  zydeco: <msmith5> I think black really should have tried harder to bring the bishop to e6 for a solid defensive position.

17....Be6 18.Ng5 Qd7 (Qd6) 19.Nxe6 Qxe6 20.Qxe6 fxe6 and black may have to suffer a little in the endgame but should be able to draw.

19...Qb5 forces a decisive position. 19....h6 instead keeps white's knight from g5 and looks pretty safe.

Tolush probably saw that after 20....gxf6 the position would be very sharp; he trusted in his own tactical ability, but just lost to Tal in the ensuing dogfight.

search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
25. Nc6!!
from Weakened Castled Position by Jaredfchess
Game 16
from The Life and Games of Mikhail Tal by MoonlitKnight
Game collection: TAL
by chessdeviant
25.? (November 19, 2004)
from Friday Puzzles, 2004-2010 by Phony Benoni
Imaginative play by Tal
from Logical Chess by alligator
Zonal Tournament Game #1
from Road to the Championship - Mik Tal by Fischer of Men
Mil y Una Partidas 1950-1959
by K9Empress
Tal Fever
by chocobonbon
Beating the Nimzo-Indian D - Top GM Games
by JoseTigranTalFischer
remembering Tal
by Yopo
T Players Tease Fredthebear
by fredthebear
Game 19
from Veliki majstori saha 26 TALJ (Marovic) by Chessdreamer
Quickly Perhaps Prickly QG Poked Fredthebear
by fredthebear
25.? (Friday, November 19)
from POTD Nimzo Indian by takchess
Game 16
from Life and Games (Tal) by isfsam
25. Nc6!!
from Weakened Castled Position by patzer2
Riga URS ch 1958
from Mikhail Tal: Selected Games by wanabe2000
Game 16
from Life and Games (Tal) by Qindarka
USSR Championship 1958
by suenteus po 147
Tal king of chess
by LESTRADAR
plus 17 more collections (not shown)


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC