chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Svetozar Gligoric vs Mikhail Tal
Bled-Zagreb-Belgrade Candidates (1959), Bled, Zagreb & Belgrade YUG, rd 23, Oct-19
Benoni Defense: Classical Variation. Czerniak Defense (A78)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 7 times; par: 59 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 33 more Gligoric/Tal games
sac: 18...Nxd5 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Some games have photographs. These are denoted in the game list with the icon.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Jun-08-05  bomb the bishop: the opening encyclopedia recommends: 11..♘c7, followed by 12.a4 (12.f3 is another possibility)..b6, 13. f4
Jun-08-05  Kangaroo: <bomb the bishop: the opening encyclopedia recommends: 11..Nc7, followed by 12.a4 (12.f3 is another possibility)..b6, 13. f4>

The ECO has its own vision of this opening, but Tal was who and what he was, that is a pioneer who took what he liked from the theoretical articles and ignored the rest.

The same is true about any of the great grandmasters, including all historic champions: Steinitz to Kasparov, those who analyzed with no trust to computers!

Jun-08-05  bomb the bishop: yes its always good to come up with innovative ideas, however you must have an excelent game play before employing them, the good thing about the opening encyclopedia though, is that it is based on the latest opening lines that have lead to succesful positions and obviously as you stated a computer analyzed position study
Jun-08-05  zhentil: <Kangaroo>You don't think Kasparov uses computers to study the opening?
Jun-08-05  Kangaroo: <zhentil: <Kangaroo>You don't think Kasparov uses computers to study the opening?>

YES, he does! But unlike those who use computers only and nothing but computers, Kasparov has developed analytical skills on his own!

In addition, I suspect, he does not need a computer as much as the frequent participants of numerous tournaments do! He can survive without his "hardware"!

Jun-11-09  ROO.BOOKAROO: Ray Keene gives a good analysis in his London Times column of June 11, 2009 http://entertainment.timesonline.co...
Nov-26-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  zydeco: Gligoric plays planlessly from move 8 to 17. The bishop needs to be on d3 or f3 (after f4). 13.b3 and 14.Bb2 don't do much against the Benoni. 16.Bd3 b4 17.Ne2 looks like it holds the balance.

45....g3 is a pretty finish.

May-20-15  ToTheDeath: No one was better than Tal in 1959. No one.
May-20-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: Why not 30.f4 with idea 30...Re4 31.Nd2?
May-20-15  ToTheDeath: Well spotted, Honza. 29...Kg7 seems like a major inaccuracy. 29...f4 retains the advantage. Gligoric was probably in severe time trouble already here, the cost of defending a Tal attack.
Dec-01-15  Mehem: Maybe Tal was a real hypnotizer? Something very strange must have haunted Gligoric's mind to make him play 32.g4??
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
50 games better than that other Tal game.
by JoseTigranTalFischer
good win by tal in classical benoni
from benoni and benko gambit by mathlover
rooks > queen
from benoni / benko brilliancies by nckmrrtt
50 games better than that other Tal game.
by Retarf
ghaiethe's favorite games
by ghaiethe
Benoni Def. Classical. Czerniak Def. (A78) 0-1 Two Rs best Q
from Perky Old Mod Benkoni by fredthebear
Tal positionell
from 98_A60-79 BENONI - BLACK wins or draws by whiteshark
52 games better than that other Tal game.
by ughaibu
Game 14
from Tal - The Modern Benoni by MadBishop
Ray Keene gives a good analysis in his London Times column
from yPublished Games by Year & Unconfirmed Source 3 by fredthebear
Candidates Tournament Game #23
from Road to the Championship - Mik Tal by Fischer of Men
Game 14
from Tal - The Modern Benoni by AdolfoAugusto
Q6p:RR6p (+1N each side)
from 04_Q:RR by whiteshark
Benoni Defense: Classical Variation
by dnash007
Benoni Defense: Classical Variation. Czerniak Defense
from MKD's Favourite Games by MKD
QUIQUE COLLECCION
by genie9
Match Tal!
by amadeus
remembering Tal
by Yopo


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC