Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Mikhail Tal vs Bent Larsen
Larsen - Tal 3rd place Candidates Playoff (1969), Eersel NED, rd 6, Mar-19
Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer. Classical Variation (B65)  ·  0-1


Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 4 times; par: 38 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 38 more Tal/Larsen games
sac: 39...Qg1 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Help with kibitzing features can be found on our Kibtizing Help Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
Premium Chessgames Member
  sfm: Can't believe that I am the first to comment on this absolutely stunning game.

Doesn't Larsen know that he is supposed to attack the white king on the Q-side, in the usual who-gets-mated-first race? No, he does not. Instead he plays against White on the K-side, doing risky pawn advances while maintaining security for his king in a delicate balance.

A move like 15.-,g5!?!? could only have been played by Larsen - and Tal himself!

Sep-10-10  twinlark: Strange that this game hasn't attracted more comments, even after <sfm> drew attention to it, though a few people have attached it to their collections.

Must say that the exchange of rooks that finished the game is a novel one.

<sfm> has a good point...fancy attacking from your king side when your king side is about to be attacked anyway.

Sep-11-10  hellopolgar: 38. ... Qxc1+
would be a good Tuesday puzzle.
Sep-11-10  Kazzak: Very fun to follow, though it should be pointed out that Tal himself made serious efforts to have this match postponed due to ill health, and that he considers his play completely sub-par throughout, filled with (his) mistakes. (According to TLaGoMT).

That said - a wonderful game to follow.

Sep-11-10  twinlark: Heh. Just finished reading an interview with Larsen on Chessbase not long before he died, and he said he felt like crap during the Denver match with Fischer.

Who was it that said they'd never played a fit opponent?

Sep-11-10  Kazzak: :-)

I was thinking the same thing, but thought I should put in the info, as Tal makes a big issue of it in his book. He fought with the Soviet chess federation, which sabotaged his attempts to move the match.

But that's his POV.
Yes, health issues do tend to be used to explain away losses - but there's little doubt that Tal's health was frail at the time.

Oct-13-15  Howard: Exactly what was the purpose of this match ? I recall reading that it was for a spot in the 1970 interzonal, but wouldn't both Tal and Larsen have been seeded into it ? They both were in the 1968 Candidates obviously. And the four players who were eliminated in the quarterfinals (Gligoric, Portisch, Reshevsky, and Geller) were all in the interzonal.

So why not Tal ?

Oct-13-15  Petrosianic: Only the 3rd place finisher in the Candidates got an Interzonal spot back then. Those other four people probably got in the Interzonal by qualifying for it. (Reshevsky and Geller definitely did).
Premium Chessgames Member
  NeverAgain: WWC Editing Project explains it here: Game Collection: Larsen - Tal 3rd place Candidates Playoff 1969
Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: 19.Rf1!? was worth of attention. Then black has nothing better than 19...Qg6 (19...hxg3?? 20.Rf3 +-) 20.Qxh4 Kg7 21.g4 Rh8 22.Qf2 Rh3 23.Ne2 e5 24.Ng3 with a nice position and more than sufficient compensation for sacced Exchange.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Game Six- March 20
from Larsen - Tal 3rd place Candidates Playoff 1969 by WCC Editing Project
Round 6
from WCC Index [Larsen-Tal 1969] by Hesam7
drawing games
by nic dadamo
Match Tal!
by amadeus
Game 6 March 19 (Wednesday)
from Larsen - Tal 3rd place Candidates Playoff 1969 by Tabanus
Bent bemuses Mischa
from twinlark's favorite games by twinlark
Bf1-Bc4 Sicilians
by fredthebear
larsen vs tal - rauzer
from pawn power by nic dadamo
IGM Bent Larsen
by 64rutor
Larsen's passed hanging pawns squash Tal
from cuppajoe's favorite games by cuppajoe

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC