chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Albin Planinc vs James Tarjan
"Tarjan the Apeman" (game of the day Aug-02-2008)
Banja Luka (1974), Banja Luka YUG, rd 8, Oct-19
Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation. Yugoslav Attack (B77)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 1 more A Planinc/J Tarjan game
sac: 18...Nxg4 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To access more information about the players (more games, favorite openings, statistics, sometimes a biography and photograph), click their highlighted names at the top of this page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Aug-02-08  PinnedPiece: How about "Tarjan the Pawn Man"!!!
Aug-02-08  ToTheDeath: Black's piece sacrifice is an important resource, and yet my inner classicist isn't comfortable with the notion that two pawns can outweigh a whole piece. Indeed, upon looking up the theory of this line I found that the correct way to play is 24.Nd4! h5 25.Kd2 with some advantage for White.

Because of this 22...Be5 preserving the two bishop advantage is the better way for Black to maintain compensation.

Aug-02-08  Jedithious: For 16., I would have done N-b3 instead of Nde2.
Aug-02-08  Dr. J: Why not 19 ... Bxe5 to keep a third pawn as compensation?
Aug-02-08  Once: Love that black king in the endgame!

<Dr. J> I put the position after 19. fxg4 into Fritz 11. It agrees that 19. ... Bxe5 and 19. ... Bxg4 are the best two moves, but its evaluation does not give either move a clear advantage over the other. At the moment, both are around 0.32.

Aug-02-08  RedStarRising: <Dr. J: Why not 19 ... Bxe5 to keep a third pawn as compensation?>

After 19...Bxg4 20. exd6 Qxd6, Blacks still has a three pawn advantage while also inviting queen exchange. Of course that's reduces the pawn advantage down to two again, but Black has a great attacking position now.

Aug-02-08  kevin86: Black had a great bargain:three connected passed pawns and a bishop for two knights. With the help of a friendly king and the absense of the adverse monarch,the pawns were able to rule the day.

The future is this:one pawn will cost a rook,the second a knight,and the third will ride home uncontested. Or black could give up the rook for a knight and win even faster with the second pawn.

Aug-02-08  Xeroxx: 16.e5 anyone?
Feb-07-15  Bruce Graham: King and pawn march to victory. Nice one!
Apr-05-25
Premium Chessgames Member
  GrahamClayton: Tarjan's plan is simple and straightforward - push the pawns! Planinc doesn't find a plan to stop their inexorable advance.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC