chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Jan Timman vs Artur Yusupov
Candidates semi-final (1992), Linares ESP, rd 6, Apr-??
Russian Game: Modern Attack. Trifunovic Variation (C43)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 55 more Timman/Yusupov games
sac: 14.Be4 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Premium members can suggest a game for Guess-the-Move with the Guess-the-Move Suggestion Queue.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Jul-04-04  refutor: this line (up to move 17 or so) was played at the highest levels in the late 80s/early 90s Rozentalis vs Ivanchuk, 1986 , Van der Wiel vs Mikhalchishin, 1987 , Oll vs Khalifman, 1988 , Rozentalis vs Gelfand, 1988 , Kasparov vs Anand, 1991 , Timman vs Yusupov, 1992 . this was the sixth game in the candidates match and the other timman-yusupov was the second game, so i guess after this result, the "top guys" decided that it was better for white? so black plays 5. ... Nd7 now
May-01-05  Poisonpawns: <refutor> Thanks for the info: I was about to comment how i never saw this line before, and how interesting it was to me.In this game there seems to be alot of possibilities for both sides that could change the outlook on the variation.i.e instead of 15..f5!? why not the immediate 15..Nb3!? axb3 doubling whites pawns? If you are going to lose the piece at least leave a defect in the opponents position.Yusupov allows timman to recapture the piece without a price.Instead of 17..c6!? the move Rad8! is strong if 18.Bxb7? Rd1!+ 19.Rxd1 Bxd1 and the knight goes free
Feb-11-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: "And so, instead of increasing his lead, Yusupov allowed his opponent to even the score. [Timman vs Yusupov, 1992 ] Winning on the next day [game 5], Artur again took the lead, and now we needed to decide whether to repeat the principled variation that was played in the second game [Timman vs Yusupov, 1992 ]. We checked our analysis for a rather long time. Having not found a refutation, we decided to take the risk. Alas, we guessed wrong. <Timman and his second, grandmaster Piket, had found a powerful novelty that refuted the variation, making it unplayable.>

21.Bf1! [...]

26.Re1! [...]

30.Be4!, and Timman eventually converted the advantage.

The score became even again. But our misfortunes did not end there. The next day, Yusupov was unable to win an absolutely winning position. And with Black, forced to play a new variation, he tried a rather dubious line in the Petroff Defense, suffered defeat, and failed to salvage the match.

It seems to me that, after this failure, Yusupov gave up on having an ambitious competitive chess career. He continued to play in strong tournaments, but he now spent much of his time on the lessons he regularly gave to support his family. It became difficult for him to keep up with modern theory and maintain his competitive form at the necessary level. This was evident, when Yusupov was to play Anand in the first match of the new candidates cycle in early 1994, Artur took his wife and little children with him to Wijk aan Zee. Of course, that did not help him concentrate on the match. Anand won with a score of 4-2."

-- Dvoretsky

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
100
from C43 (Jusupov) by Chessdreamer
Round 6
from WCC Index [Timman-Yusupov 1992] by Hesam7
Game 77
from For Friends and Colleagues 1 (Dvoretsky) by Qindarka
98_C42f_Russian Game (all but 4.Nxf7!?)
by whiteshark
Volume 54 (21.Bf1)
from Chess Informant Most Important Novelty winners by Chessdreamer
Jan Timman: Chess The Adventurous Way
by Resignation Trap
Game collection: B43
by ghall3
Trifunovic Variation
from P Ds to Open Flame Games Burnt Fredthebear by fredthebear
Interesting Games
by Easy Point


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC