chessgames.com

Ernst Gruenfeld vs Carlos Torre Repetto
"Running into the Stonewall" (game of the day Jun-26-08)
Baden Baden (1925)  ·  Dutch Defense: Stonewall. Modern Variation (A80)  ·  0-1
To move:
Last move:

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 43 times; par: 15 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 3 more Carlos Torre/Gruenfeld games
PGN: download | view Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If you missed a Game of the Day, you can review the last year of games at our Game of the Day Archive.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Pgn4web Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Mar-05-06  LluviaSean: what a game...what a game!!
Feb-24-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  hesyrett: <Chessical> 9 Ba3! is not just a playable alternative; per current thinking it's actually best.  In fact, Torre should have played 8...Qe7 to forestall this.  Without his dark-bound B, Black's melanpenia becomes painful.
Jun-09-08  JimmyVermeer: Laszlo Polgar gives the date of this game as 1975, which was some time after Ernst Grunfeld's death, which led me to believe that the player was actually Yehuda Grunfeld. Can anyone verify if 1925 was the correct date?
Jun-26-08  aldehyde: I think 13. e3 shud have been a savior.

followed by

13. ... Bxe3
14. Rf2 Bxf2
15. Qxf2 Nxf2
16. exf

what say

Jun-26-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  An Englishman: Good Evening:

Abdulaziz fell into the same trap by transposition nearly 75 years later:

M Abdulaziz vs C Saavedra, 2004

There were a surprising number of weak moves by both Grunfeld and Torre, given how short this game lasts. 5...Bd6 is weaker than 5...Be7, and others have pointed out that Torre should have played 8...Qe7. Meanwhile, Grunfeld starts to go wrong at move 2(!), because Nf3 is premature. Substitute 2.g3,Nf6; 3.Bg2,e6; 4.c4,d5?! and now White can play 5.Nh3! which wins 72.4% of the time in the CG database (which is why 4...Be7 and ...c6 are better).

Still, back in the Twenties the Dutch was little-played and not used except as an excuse for an all-out King side attack. The theory was rather primitive in those days.

Jun-26-08  Manic: <aldehyde> Yes it seems that although it is still losing it avoids the forced mate. I think 13.e3 13...Bxe3 14.Rf2 and now maybe 14...Qh6 is better than just going for the exchange straight away as if 15.fxe5 fxe5 and the rook is still threatened.
Jun-26-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  kellmano: This game amused me. I imagine if i played GMs I'd lose like this all the time.
Jun-26-08  DaveyL: I reckon 12. c5 would also have been playable. White's a piece down but black has 3 pieces under fire.
Jun-26-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  Travis Bickle: I have a question for you pro's out there. How is an opening or a defense determined in a game? To me it looks like WHT opens with The Kings Indian Attack and I see Black countered with The Dutch. But how is it determined which opening it shall be named? Whichever opening or defense it transposes to the most?
Jun-26-08  gtgloner: I'm wondering about 11. f3, find myself in agreement with notyetagm. Seems to me that white's troubles start with this move, since the attack on the black knight potentially opens up the diagonal for the bishop check.
Jun-26-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  Jack Kerouac: Hey, 'Englishman'. Good call on the commentary; eh,what?
Jun-26-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: It's mate in three:

13...Ng3+ 14 hxg3 Qh6+ 15 Bh3 Qxh3#

Jun-26-08  Duque Roquero: What an impressive miniature by Torre.
Jun-26-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  patzer2: With 11...Nxe5!, Black offers White a choice of not one but two poisoned Knights to capture.

If 12. dxe5?, as in the game continuation, White has captured the most poisoned Knight which clears the way for Black's mate in the continuation given above by <Kevin86>.

If 12. fxe4, then Black gains a strong and near decisive advantage after 12...Ng4! 13. e5 Qh6 14. h3 (14. Rf3 Qxh2+ 15. Kf1 Be7 ) 14... Ne3 15. Qc1 Nxf1 16. Qxh6 gxh6 17. Kxf1 Bb4 . With the exchange-up and no weaknesses in his position, Black has all the winning chances here.

Jun-26-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  patzer2: I put 11...Nxe5! into my clearance collection since 12. dxe5? clears the d-4 square for the Bishop's King check in a mating combination, and 12. fxe4 clears the way for a strong King-side attack with 12...Ng4!
Jun-26-08  DaveyL: Sadly 12. c5 ruins all that - check it out.
Jun-26-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  Jimfromprovidence: 11 f3?? was the key (losing) move for white. 11 Nxd7, below, looks just fine.


click for larger view

Now, black must play 11..Bxd7. At this point, Nc3, Nd2 or c5 are all perfectly valid options for white.

Jun-26-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  patzer2: <DaveyL> Good catch! Got to admit that after 11...Nxe5! that 12. c5! offers a much better defense than capturing either of the Knights.

After 12. c5! Ng4 13. fxg4 Bc7 14. Bxe4! dxe4 15. d5 Qg6 16. d6 Bd8 =, it's pretty much leveled out.

Still I think 11...Nxe5! is the best move in the position, even if it's not a clear win. It offers winning chances, especially if White snatches either of the threatened Knights. Also, it gives Black at least even chances or better after 12. c5!

Jun-26-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  patzer2: <jimfromprovidence> Did you check out <DaveyL>'s 12. c5! to try and keep White in the game? I agree that 11. f3?! is inferior to all the options you gave. However, if 12. C5! holds, I'm not sure that makes 11. f3?! Nxe5! a losing move for white (except in the game continuation).

Jun-26-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  Jimfromprovidence: <patzer2> <Did you check out <DaveyL>'s 12. c5! to try and keep White in the game? I agree that 11. f3?! is inferior to all the options you gave. However, if 12. C5! holds, I'm not sure that makes 11. f3?! Nxe5! a losing move for white (except in the game continuation).>

Yes, there's really no difference material-wise between the two positions.

I like 11 Nxd7 better because white does not have to unnecessarily move his f pawn and he is able to develop his knight and connect his rooks after 11...Bxd7. Just a personal preference.

Jun-28-08  JimmyVermeer: Travis Bickle, different people name different openings differently. I personally tend to prefer to use whichever one most closely matches the actual opening, though I use both if possible. In this particular game, White played d4 on his first move, which is not a King's Indian Attack. A King's Indian Attack begins with White playing Nf3 on his first move. This particular game is a Horwitz Defence. It is listed as a Dutch Defence because Black played f5 on his 2nd move (Strictly speaking, a Dutch Defence is when Black plays f5 on his first move). There is no general agreement as to which would be the correct name to give this opening. Now you probably already knew this, but just in case you didn't, a move by Black has different names depending on which move White made first. For example, If Black plays e6 in response to White playing d4, it is called Horwitz Defence. But if Black plays e6 in response to White playing e4, it is called French Defence.
Dec-02-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  sevenseaman: It must have been an aghast Gruenfeld - nobody climbs the ramparts so swiftly!
Mar-03-12  momsteere: Please excuse my novice question: why wouldn't White make a 14th move:

White Move 14: h2 to g3 to capture black knight & not be checkmated?

May-28-12  lacker: momsteere: after hxg3, Qh6+ leads to mate
Nov-17-12  AlessKnight: 10...Qf6 very suspect, mate web?
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other users.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
Blow the Whistle See something which violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
ipap's favorite games
by ipap
64idi0t's_2
by 64idi0t
BlueMars' favorite games
by BlueMars
Amusing
by lonchaney
#38 - Torre's double victories
from "Wonders and Curiosities of Chess" - Pt 1 by GrahamClayton
RickL's favorite games Dutch
by RickL
zengames ll
by zentovic
Game collection: 3
by gr2ca1
Dutch Defense: Stonewall. Modern Variation
from Stonewall Attack & The Dutch Defense by RayDelColle
Stonewall
from White P-Q4 or P-QB4 or N-KB3 --- Dutch defence by saintdc07
Dutch Minature
from Gameoverziggy's favorite games by Gameoverziggy
F47's favorite games
by F47
thouston's favorite games
by thouston
addiction to chess' favorite games
by addiction to chess
jacklovecaissa's favorite games
by jacklovecaissa
11...Nxe5! puts two knights enprise for two clearance options
from Clearance by patzer2
Knights play the trick
from World Champion avari viraf's favorite games by fm avari viraf
equanimus' favorite games
by equanimus
Running into a Stonewall
from Davison's favorite games by Davison
DUTCH
by jjones5050
plus 26 more collections (not shown)


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Little ChessPartner | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2013, Chessgames Services LLC
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies