|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·
Later Kibitzing > |
May-26-04
 |
| kevin86: Just think-if Anastasia had a mate,he could have been the Tsar of Russia ,lol. |
 |
| May-26-04 |
| PizzatheHut: <patzer2> It looks like the best line after 33. g4 is 33...fxg3 e.p. 34. Qg2 Nf4 and white is in trouble. If 35. Qxg3 Rxg3 (obviously) and if 35. Qd2 or anywhere else along the second rank, then 35...g2+ wins. |
|
May-26-04
 |
| alphee: Pattern Recognition (PR) was mentioned in previous days' kibitz. PR a crucial in medical diagnosis and practice and it is acquired through practice only. The last serie of puzzles that related to attacking a white king in g1 or h1 seems to prove that it is true for chess to. I guess it also works for variations in middle game but with a more demanding training than just end game puzzles. |
|
| May-26-04 |
| Whitehat1963: Definitely didn't see this one as played. I saw the effectiveness of Ng2 but couldn't follow it up. I also liked the move Bh3, but Ng2 is definitely the best move on the board. |
|
May-26-04
 |
| Gypsy: <patzer2 : ... However, if after 32...Ne2!, White plays 33. g4!? Black should still win, but it is a bit more difficult.> 32...Ne2 33.g4 fxg3 e.p. 34.Qg2 Nf4 is devastating enough. The variation you give seems to have a typo or two; the moves suggested are not feasible. Its good that you noticed the g4 possibility though! |
|
| May-26-04 |
| d4Nf6Bg5: I like the mating sequence that thought was the solution better- 32...Ne2 33.Qb6 Ng3+ 34.Kg1 Qxh2 35.Kxh2 Rh6+ 36.Kg1 Rh1+ 37.Kf2 Rxf1#.
Is there anything wrong with my analysis? |
|
| May-26-04 |
| notsodeepthought: Possibly, there is something wrong... After ... Q:h2, white plays 35 Kf2, after which black has to be careful about backrank mates and the threats posed by the passed white pawns. |
|
| May-26-04 |
| Checkmate123: what about 32.exd5...does that prevent mate... |
|
| May-27-04 |
| Dudley: <dicksosa> Look at my original post at the top of the page(and the following one correcting one of the moves) and you will notice that you missed the point of what I was saying. Your line is refuted by 28.Qg1, as already pointed out by Durandal. |
|
| May-27-04 |
| Hinchliffe: <karlzen> Nice to see you back and once again brining your excellent analysis to the party. By the way where have you been? Another Swede mentioned he was off to play in a tournament in Gothenburg and I was curious as to whether you would be playing there too? Anyway I am delighted to read your comments again. Take care Stephen. |
|
May-27-04
 |
| acirce: <Hinchliffe> That tournament is in July, http://www.schacksm.se/ |
|
| May-28-04 |
| Hinchliffe: <acirce> Sorry I forget your name. Have you been to the tournament yet if not please let me know how you do. I will be thinking of you and of course wishing you well. |
|
| May-28-04 |
| poktirity: <Hinchliffe> Swedish Championships for school teams was in Gothenburg this weekend. |
|
| May-28-04 |
| karlzen: <Checkmate123>, 32.exd5 e4! 33.fxe4 f3 34.g3 Be5! or 32...Nf5! 33.Qb6 Qg5 34.Rf2 Qh4 35.Kg1 e4! (thematical KID move) 36.fxe4 Bd4. <d4Nf6Bg5>, <notsodeepthought>, <resty>, <geronimo>: 32...Ne2 33.Qb6 Ng3+ 34.Kg1 Qxh2 35.Kf2 Qh4! should win easily. Thanks <Hinchliffe>! :) I've been busy at school lately, that's why I haven't posted in a while. There's a tournament in Gothenburg (Open) this weekend and I'm probably going to play since it's just a twenty minutes bus trip away. Gothenburg is hosting the SWE Ch three years in a row now (2004-2006) and the EUR Nat Team Ch 2005 so there's a lot of good action in the summer too. I hope you're well Stephen, I certainly am. |
|
| May-28-04 |
| karlzen: <poktirity>, that's right but somehow my school (and I) failed to participate even though my local club organised the event. |
|
| May-28-04 |
| poktirity: That's a shame. My team finished 5th in the gymnasiet-class. |
|
| May-28-04 |
| karlzen: OK, so you played for Stockholm. |
|
| May-28-04 |
| poktirity: Where you there at the tournament? |
|
| May-28-04 |
| karlzen: No I wasn't. |
|
| May-29-04 |
| poktirity: Ok. In which class would you have been competing in if your school had signed up? |
|
| May-31-04 |
| karlzen: Gymnasiet. |
|
| May-31-04 |
| poktirity: Does your school have a goog team? |
|
| Jun-01-04 |
| karlzen: Uhm, I'm not really sure how good we would've scored in that tournament. I think we have ratings: 2200, 2000, 1900, 1700 over four boards. It's my first year at the school so, I'm not all that certain. |
|
| Jun-01-04 |
| poktirity: That would probably have put you in 2nd or 3rd place =) |
|
Jun-01-04
 |
| patzer2: <Gpsy> I meant to record 32...Ne2! 33. g4!? fxg3 e.p. (what I intended by 33...fxg4) 34. Qg2 Bg3! 35. Qxe2 g2+ 36. Kg1 gxf1=Q+  However, <Pizzathehut>'s and your suggestion of 33.g4 fxg3 e.p. 34.Qg2 Nf4 also wins. |
|
|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·
Later Kibitzing > |
