Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Walther von Holzhausen vs Siegbert Tarrasch
Simul, 26b (1912), Frankfurt GER, Oct-07
Italian Game: Scotch Gambit (C55)  ·  1-0


Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 25 times; par: 11 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 948 more games of Tarrasch
sac: 10.Bxf7+ PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If you do not want to read posts by a certain member, put them on your ignore list.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Nov-28-07  Komapsimnita: Just couldn't see the Qd5+. Got the Bishop and knight moves, but my minds eye tricked me into thinking that the path to d5 was still blocked when it wasn't. Can you get glasses for your mind's eye?
Premium Chessgames Member
  FICSwoodpusher: A very nice sac sac mate combination. 9. ... Nd7 is the sort of mistake that you wouldn't forget in a hurry.
Nov-28-07  newzild: Another easy one - it's been an easy week.
The first thing to notice is that black's queen is smothered, and that Ne6 would win it if the f7 pawn couldn't capture. So let's try 10.Bxf7+ Kxf7 11.Ne6. Of course the king can capture now, but it's dangerously centralised. There's probably a mate here - sure enough, Qd5+ and Qf5 mate. Took about 5 seconds.
It's amazing that the great Tarrasch allowed such a simple mate.
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheaN: 3/3

The initial move was easy to spot (is there something else?) but I was looking a long time at Qh5. Thinking it won after something like g7 with Qxh7+ I still went on looking for a better continuation (I had the feeling Black had some escape), after which I immediately saw 11.Ne6 with Kxe6 and Qd5+ (although I went on with a mating trap with Bg5+, Qf5+ with mate on the g-file instead of immediately Qf5#, I mated >_>).

Strange that I got the correct solution whilst looking ten times longer at (and not seeing a clear refutation of) the losing line.

Nov-28-07  MostlyAverageJoe: For all those surprised that Tarrasch allowed such a simple mate, I would like to repeat my guess:

<I suppose Tarrasch let himself be mated on purpose, rather than suffer a slow agony after 11...Kg8 12.NxQ.>

Premium Chessgames Member
  egilarne: As <Eggman> has stated, this game has similarities to L Monosson vs Fauque, 1935

1.e4 d6 2.d4 Nd7 3.Bc4 g6 4.Nf3 Bg7 5.Bxf7+ Kxf7 6.Ng5+ Kf6 7.Qf3# 1-0

I may add the following: Lusgin vs Joffe, 1968

1. e4 d6 2. Nf3 g6 3. Bc4 Nd7??, and it is even more impressing that black is dead lost after 3 moves in that game - 4. Bxf7+! is a forced win - wins queen or mates.

Premium Chessgames Member
  DarthStapler: Hey, I got this! I'm on a lucky streak
Nov-28-07  aazqua: Very famous game and a nice combo.
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: <I suppose Tarrasch let himself be mated on purpose, rather than suffer a slow agony after 11...Kg8 12.NxQ.>

<MAJ> It was slower to play a King move than to simply tip it over.

Nov-28-07  vibes43: <Komapsimnita> touched on my problem. I have more trouble visualizing where spaces will have been created than where moved pieces will be. I missed 12.Qd5+.
Premium Chessgames Member
  GannonKnight: Three for three! Got this one quickly. Just by looking at the position, the key had to be a way to suffocate the queen. The cool part is the fact that the only way to prevent was to leave the king out in the open.
Premium Chessgames Member
  jperr75108: very pretty problem
Premium Chessgames Member
  Peligroso Patzer: As previously noted in a comment by <chancho> on an earlier page of this thread (page 2) when this game was used for the daily puzzle (Nov-28-07), Von Holzhausen's concluding combination resembles the winning tactic from this famous game: Fischer vs Reshevsky, 1958
Mar-03-09  WhiteRook48: too bad this is now known as Fischer's tactics
May-01-09  WhiteRook48: 9...Nd7
Apr-21-11  SeanBurdine: Tarrasch's timing was 1 move off in this game. If instead of 8... R-K1? he immediately plays 8... N-Q2, to be followed up with 9... B-B3 and 10... N(Q2)-K4, he emerges with a somewhat cramped but solidly defendable position. With his KB2 guarded by the Rook, that sequence of moves works. It's only after he removed a very necessary guard from the weak spot at KB2 that 9... N-Q2??? becomes a game-losing blunder. Timing is everything...
Apr-21-11  sevenseaman: From the comments one is led to believe it was Tarrasch who lost the game rather than Holzhausen won it.

One could go on making appropriate apologies for poor Black play but clearly Holzhausen did make the two strong moves, 10. Bxf7 and 11. Ne6 as the opportunity presented itself.

Premium Chessgames Member
  Calli: Lets restore a little of Tarrasch's esteem. First, this game is from a simultaneous display. He was playing 25 other games. Secondly, this is the incorrect score, he did not play 11...Kxe6 and get mated. The correct score follows:

[Event "Simul, 1 of 26"]
[Site "Frankfurt, Germany"]
[Date "1912.10.07"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Walther Von Holzhausen"]
[Black "Siegbert Tarrasch"]
[Result "1-0"]
[WhiteElo "?"]
[BlackElo "?"]
[ECO "C55"]
[EventDate "?"]
[PlyCount "27"]

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6 4.d4 exd4 5.0-0 d6 6.Nxd4 Be7 7.Nc3 0-0 8.h3 Re8 9.Re1 Nd7 10.Bxf7+ Kxf7 11.Ne6 Nde5 12.Qh5+ Kg8 13.Nxd8 Rxd8 14.Nd5 resigns 1-0

See C.N. 6382 for more information.

Premium Chessgames Member
  Oliveira: <See C.N. 6382 for more information:>

Premium Chessgames Member
  Oliveira: Oops... wrong link!

For more on this von Holzhausen vs Tarrasch game you should go to

Sep-10-15  SeanAzarin: Tarrasch clearly had a bad day at the office, so to speak. And it wasn't due to any pressure his opponent was putting on his position: the errors were unforced.

I. A. Horowitz, analyzing the game, comments as follows:

[On Tarrasch's 8th move] "Played with singular lack of judgment."

[On Tarrasch's even more disastrous 9th move] "Black is blind to the difficulties of his position, and instead of trying 9... N-K4, which would at least offer temporary relief, he stumbles into a fatal trap which he has constructed with his own feeble moves."

Premium Chessgames Member
  Gypsy: <Calli: ... Secondly, this is the incorrect score, he did not play 11...Kxe6 and get mated. ...>

Lot's of folklore in old chess books. I just found this game, in the notes to Fischer vs Reshevsky, 1958 -- in Pachman's "Modern Chess Tactics". Pachman gives it also with the <11.Ne6! Kxe6 12.Qd5+...> finish.

Premium Chessgames Member
  zanzibar: The correct version of the game had made it to San Francisco within a year of its play:


Jun-21-18  sudoplatov: I'd like to add the game Lachex vs J Nogueiras, 1990. (I was one of the program's authors.) The loser was not Jesus Nogueiras of Cuba but another J. Nogueiras from the US.
Premium Chessgames Member
  zanzibar: Whoa, on two counts....


1) Lachex was written in Fortran and assembler.

(Betcha it wasn't that namby-pamby F9x/2k stuff either)

2) Wikispaces is closing. (Ouch for chessprogramming pages)

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 3)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>
This game is type: EXHIBITION (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
10. Bxf7+! forces mate or wins decisive material
from Mating Attack by Jaredfchess
Bishop sac on f7!
from Nova's favorite games 3 by Nova
khalid006's favorite games
by khalid006
The fall of Tarrasch....
from Collections in Idleness 1 by xajik
smothered queen
from miniatures by old coot
from 70c_middlegame SACS on f7 (of f2) by whiteshark
10.? (Wednesday, November 28)
from POTD Scotch Game Scotch Gambit by takchess
Game collection: 4
by ph2ca
Italian Game: Scotch Gambit (C55) 1-0 Ne6 traps Dd8
from yFredthebear's Office Memo '16 to C Quad by fredthebear
Tarrasch bites the dust ,falls in big trap!
from quick knockouts of greats by kevin86
from elixab's favorite games by elixab
Amenities and Background of Chess-play
by Phony Benoni
Italian Game: Scotch Gambit (C55) 1-0 Ne6 traps Dd8
from 15 Movies Fredthebear Watched at the Drive-in by fredthebear
Elivaldo's favorite games
by Elivaldo
10. Bxf7+! forces mate or wins decisive material
from Mating Attack by patzer2
Game 50
from Wonders and Curiosities of Chess (Chernev) by Qindarka
by bishop
Skotsk G 1-0 13 drag. SPELA!
from xfer's favorite games2007 by xfer

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2018, Chessgames Services LLC