chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing


register now - it's free!
Kerner vs Alfred Brinckmann
"Back from the Brinck" (game of the day Jul-20-12)
cr (1955)  ·  Italian Game: Two Knights Defense. Traxler Counterattack Knight sac line (C57)  ·  0-1
To move:
Last move:

explore this opening
find similar games 185 more games of A Brinckmann
sac: 6...Qe7 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: The tournament is found above the game. For the newest chess events, this information may be a link which takes you to the tournament page which includes other games, a crosstable, discussion, etc.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with the default chess viewer, please see the Pgn4web Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
Jan-21-05  Whitehat1963: Ouch! Just when you thought you had accomplished something by forking queen and rook ... (Player of the day)
Jan-21-05  GreenDayGuy: That is the bad thing about 4.Ng5, you leave the kingside undefended.
Jul-20-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: You ever get the feeling that every time Black wins in the Traxler it's exactly the same game? Black sacrifices everything, including some pieces he gets on credit from the next game. Sometimes White takes everything, in which case he gets mated. Sometimes White declines everything, in which case he still gets mated.

In fact, the only time the Traxler doesn't win is when you try it yourself.

Jul-20-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <Phony Benoni> True-then White plays into what turns out to be one of the forced draws where you haven't got enough left to give that final push. Sounds like the Marshall, the difference being that with both sides coming to grips early on, lots of stuff gets sacrificed in many of the forcing lines and things burn out more quickly than in the Marshall.
Jul-20-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  xthred: Why didn't the King capture the Bishop?
Jul-20-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: <xthred> Taking the bishop leads down a long and winding road, too detailed to go into here, in which Black gets a vicious attack. You can explore some of the lines through the Opening Explorer:

Opening Explorer

That 72.3% wins for Black is probably somewhat inflated. When Black wins in this line, the game usually contains a lot of "brilliant sacrifices" and winds up being published and preserved. When Black loses, the score generally disappears forever. Even so, White is not in for a pleasant time.

Jul-20-12  LoveThatJoker: GG

LTJ

Jul-20-12  Djoker: Always a fast mate in Traxler.
Jul-20-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Robed.Bishop: <Phony Benoni: You ever get the feeling that every time Black wins in the Traxler it's exactly the same game? Black sacrifices everything, including some pieces he gets on credit from the next game. Sometimes White takes everything, in which case he gets mated. Sometimes White declines everything, in which case he still gets mated. In fact, the only time the Traxler doesn't win is when you try it yourself.>

Funny stuff, Phony. I agree completely.

Jul-20-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Abdel Irada: Very characteristic: Black ended up with the superior bishop structure, and White got royally Traxled.
Jul-20-12  Fetvadd: Traxler is very stupid to allow for white. If black plays it good you will get mated if you make a mistake and even if you play it good he can still often force a draw. Not something you would like to play as white.
Jul-20-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  ossipossi: <3.Bc4?!>
Jul-20-12  ventricule: <Fetvadd> Taking with the bishop on f7 is the most principled way to refute the Traxler. Here's an example of how to handle it at the top level :

Anand vs Beliavsky, 1991

Anand lost because of a blunder on the last move but had a better position throughout the game.

Jul-20-12  ventricule: And in his DVD, lawrence trent recommands the same Bxf7+ approach, following this game :

K Asrian vs A Minasian, 2007

I agree it does sound extremely simple when you look at it, white is simply a pawn up.

Jul-20-12  lentil: Sorry, but it's always been the "Wilkes-Barre" gambit to me...
Jul-20-12  master of defence: I think that 9.c3 attacking the knight is better than 9.h3.
Jul-20-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: Black pieces are attacking-white's are just standing there. Most of white's forces are still in their hangers.
Jul-20-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  playground player: Does anyone around here actually play the Traxler? I've been tempted, but have yet to steel myself to try it.
Jul-20-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <pgp> It isn't something I've cared to try, because of the idea mentioned by <ventricule> with 5.Bxf7+ Ke7 6.Bd5; in the 1990s, there were two players in my former club, each about ~2000, who battled it out in this one. It was as predictable as the opening line between the Kosintseva sisters when they're paired, though the results at least varied a little.
Jul-20-12  schnarre: ...The only deviation from this line that I saw some time ago (15+ years), was White playing 7. d4 instead of taking the Rook immediately. It continued 7...exd4 8. c3 dxc3 9. Nxc3 Black still won that game.
Jul-20-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  scormus: <Phony Benoni: You ever get the feeling that every time Black wins in the Traxler ..... In fact, the only time the Traxler doesn't win is when you try it yourself.>

That must be the truest chess comment ever made about the Traxler. Now I think about it, I've found that to be true with some other openings. Or could it be the common factor is the way I play them :-\

Jul-20-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  RandomVisitor: On 9...Ng4 white can try his luck with: <Rybka4.1>

[+5.05] d=16 10.c3 Qh4 11.cxd4 Bxd4 12.Qf3 Nf6 13.Bb5+ Kf8 14.g3 Qg5

[+3.02] d=16 10.hxg4 Bg3 11.Kg1 Bxg4 12.Qxg4 Qc5 13.Bb5+ c6 14.Qxg3 Ne2+ <ouch>

[+2.28] d=16 10.Bb5+ Nxb5 11.hxg4 Bb6 12.d3 Bd7 13.a4 e4 14.Qe2 Nd4

Jul-21-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Abdel Irada: <playground player>:

There's only one way to "steel yourself": Jump in and play it. What's the worst thing that can happen? And does that thing materially differ from what can happen in any other opening?

I've had tremendous fun with the Traxler/Wilkes-Barre — playing it (from both sides), analyzing it, looking over games like this one.

About the only conclusion I can offer is that the line is immensely complex, and it's not at all clear that there is a refutation, nor that the line will ever be free of the suspicion of unsoundness. I will amplify this by adding that I don't agree with <ventricule>: 5. Bxf7+ does not leave White "simply a pawn up"; he is indeed a pawn ahead, but there's nothing "simple" about the ensuing play, and although theory endorses White, practice favors Black.

(How *much* do I enjoy the Traxler? Let's just say I once came perilously close to writing a book about the opening — and the Marshall Attack — under the title <Opening Fire>.)

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other users.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CORRESPONDENCE (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
two knights
by zentovic
Fun to watch
by emikael
5. Nxf7
from two knights for black by rollerblader1324
N takes F7
from Chess Pearls By Shailesh J.Nanal by shaileshnanal
5. Nxf7
from two knights for black by rollerblader
Italian King Trap [Italian: Two Knights]
from Opening Traps Collection by chess.master
Brinckmann !
from Life is not long enough ! Is there any ...... ? by arielbekarov
takis7up's traxlers games
by takis7up
Alfred Brinckmann (1891-1967)
from Player of the day: Notable game. by nikolaas
DubbleX's favorite games
by DubbleX
good to no.
from faroiden's favorite games by faroiden
Direct attacks 2
by TheDestruktor
July 20: Back from the Brinck
from Game of the Day 2012 by Phony Benoni
goucco piano
from Games for study by Ernesto7
Two Knights Defense, Traxler (Wilkes-Barre) Vari
by double06
Back from the Brinck
from Brilliancies By "Unknowns" by TheAlchemist
6 Kf1 The Power of Two Bishops on the Sixth Rank
from Wandering Tour through the Traxler Counterattack by tak traxler
Black - Two knights: Kf1
by gaborn


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | advertising | contact us
Copyright 2001-2014, Chessgames Services LLC
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies