|Dec-06-03|| ||Lawrence: 9.....Nd4+ is good and direct and White would surely resign right then and there, though Junior 8 shows that 9.....Qxc4+ is even a bit stronger.|
4.....Bc5 5.....Bxf2+ is not basically sound because White can refute it by playing 6.Kf1.
The real way for Black to refute White's 2 piece attack is 4.....d5 5.exd5 Na5.
|Dec-06-03|| ||Lawrence: Can you imagine somebody trying this attack against none less than Capa? Well, here it is. C Schroeder vs Capablanca, 1916 |
|Apr-20-12|| ||Abdel Irada: <Lawrence>: I disagree with your assessment of the Traxler. |
While theory suggests that white should be able to find resources to hold off black's counterattack, practice has been another matter. To my knowledge, no opening for black has better statistical results, and the hurdles that white has to clear merely to survive the opening are far too high for anyone short of a world-class IM/GM.
And my (rather extensive) studies of the line suggest that if there is a refutation, 6. Kf1 is not it. Black's attacking resources against that variation are far greater than most casual examiners realize, including many continuations in which black remedies his material poverty by spending still more pieces to sustain his attack. Among my favorite "miniatures" produced in this line is: 1. e4, e5; 2. Nf3, Nc6; 3. Bc4, Nf6; 4. Ng5, Bc5; 5. Nxf7, Bxf2+; 6. Kf1, Qe7; 7. Nxh8, d5; 8. exd5, Bg4; 9. Be2, Bxe2+; 10. Qxe2, Nd4; 11. Qxf2, o-o-o; 12. c3 (here there are multiple continuations, but most resolve to similar results), Rf8; 13. Kg1, Ng4; 14. Qe1, Qh4!++
There are of course many alternatives for both sides; among them, black can play 8. ...Nd4 in lieu of ...Bg4, and white can try any of a number of moves at his first "free moment" on move 12. None, however, offers anything resembling a convincing refutation of the Traxler, and most end in black's favor.
Daily puzzles, news, and more!
Spot an error? Please
submit a correction slip
and help us eliminate database mistakes!
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply.
Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous,
and 100% free--plus, it
entitles you to features otherwise unavailable.
Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should
Please observe our posting guidelines:
- No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
- No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
- No personal attacks against other members.
- Nothing in violation of United States law.
- No posting personal information of members.
See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.
NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page.
This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or
this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.|
This game is type: CORRESPONDENCE (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)
your profile |
Premium Membership |
Kibitzer's Café |
Biographer's Bistro |
new kibitzing |
Tournament Index |
Player Directory |
World Chess Championships |
Opening Explorer |
Guess the Move |
Game Collections |
ChessBookie Game |
Chessgames Challenge |
privacy notice |
Copyright 2001-2017, Chessgames Services LLC