chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
M Jentzsch vs H Nosutta
FRG-ch H107 corr (1954) (correspondence)
Italian Game: Two Knights Defense. Traxler Counterattack King March line (C57)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games more games of M Jentzch
sac: 5...Bxf2+ PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can learn a lot about this site (and chess in general) by reading the Chessgames Help Page. If you need help with premium features, please see the Premium Membership Help Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Dec-06-03  Lawrence: 9.....Nd4+ is good and direct and White would surely resign right then and there, though Junior 8 shows that 9.....Qxc4+ is even a bit stronger.

4.....Bc5 5.....Bxf2+ is not basically sound because White can refute it by playing 6.Kf1.

The real way for Black to refute White's 2 piece attack is 4.....d5 5.exd5 Na5.

Dec-06-03  Lawrence: Can you imagine somebody trying this attack against none less than Capa? Well, here it is. C Schroeder vs Capablanca, 1916
Apr-20-12  Abdel Irada: <Lawrence>: I disagree with your assessment of the Traxler.

While theory suggests that white should be able to find resources to hold off black's counterattack, practice has been another matter. To my knowledge, no opening for black has better statistical results, and the hurdles that white has to clear merely to survive the opening are far too high for anyone short of a world-class IM/GM.

And my (rather extensive) studies of the line suggest that if there is a refutation, 6. Kf1 is not it. Black's attacking resources against that variation are far greater than most casual examiners realize, including many continuations in which black remedies his material poverty by spending still more pieces to sustain his attack. Among my favorite "miniatures" produced in this line is: 1. e4, e5; 2. Nf3, Nc6; 3. Bc4, Nf6; 4. Ng5, Bc5; 5. Nxf7, Bxf2+; 6. Kf1, Qe7; 7. Nxh8, d5; 8. exd5, Bg4; 9. Be2, Bxe2+; 10. Qxe2, Nd4; 11. Qxf2, o-o-o; 12. c3 (here there are multiple continuations, but most resolve to similar results), Rf8; 13. Kg1, Ng4; 14. Qe1, Qh4!++

There are of course many alternatives for both sides; among them, black can play 8. ...Nd4 in lieu of ...Bg4, and white can try any of a number of moves at his first "free moment" on move 12. None, however, offers anything resembling a convincing refutation of the Traxler, and most end in black's favor.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CORRESPONDENCE. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC