Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Yakov Estrin vs Hans Berliner
"Ich bin ein Berliner" (game of the day Aug-28-2017)
5th CC World Ch Final (1965) (correspondence), corr-5
Italian Game: Two Knights Defense. Ulvestad Variation (C57)  ·  0-1


Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 28 times; par: 74 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 227 more games of Estrin
sac: 10...e4 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can step through the moves by clicking the < and > buttons, but it's much easier to simply use the left and right arrow keys on your keyboard.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 1 OF 7 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sneaky: 10 ...e4! is amazing, especially when you consider that this was a correspondence game and therefore heavily analyzed.
May-06-02  bishop: Berliner one of the greatest theoreticians in the history of chess wrote a pamphlet on this opening called "On the deathbed of the two knights defense".His book "The System" in my opinion will become a classic.
Sep-30-02  drukenknight: I see we have Berliner fans on this sight.

I think this game is one of the most overrated in history. It looks to have simply been lost in the end game after an interesting opening. (take a look at whites 33rd)

However let's look at the star move 10...e4 though. What about 11 Bxb5 Nxb 12 Qa4 and the white has got his queen active.

Interestingly enuf the very same motiff (a B for 3 pawns) could have been played on move 9. And why should that be a suprise to us since this possibility was brought to us gift wrapped by black who by playing 5...b5 was already offering a B for three pawns (i.e. the q-side pawns will be disconnected) at the very outset.

That white refuses this offer and retreats the B to f1 means that white is content to give up a tempo and see what black will do. Maybe that is ok for white but you have to wonder if white doesnt value the break of the pawns as 3 how does he value them? Something less? It's funny that we are all taught from the beginning that you have to avoid doubled pawns and ISO pawns, but often even GM are afraid to take this lesson literally.

The telling pt is this: that white had a chance to swap a B for 3 pawns on move 6 and didn't take it, then he has a similar chance on move 9 then he has a similar chance on move 10. You have to ask yourself as a player: how many times can I keep avoiding a line that appears to be balanced, even though it looks tricky?

Hmm, a B for three pawns, "well I don't know about that..." is how most players probably think about it. Which is okay for one move I suppose, but when that same motiff keep reoccuring in the game you have to ask yourself if you are not fooling yourself into a bad line by avoiding the toughest line.

A better example. this young master was asking Petrosians advice, the young master only needing one more draw to achieve some rating or something. Pet. told him something I forget exactly what. So he went out and played his game as conservatively as possible and loss to some brilliant tactics.

He asked Pet. what went wrong and P. said "didn't I tell you have to play ever game as if on the edge of a precipice?"

WHite avoids the precipice that is looming since the 5th move and tries to play it safe. That's not what chess is about.

Premium Chessgames Member
  Sneaky: This game is analyzed online here

<14. Rxf3 - This may be the losing move. After 14. Qe1!, black will find it hard to justify his material sacrifice.>

Nov-13-02  drukenknight: it seems that white allows black to dominate the center of the board when he plays 32 Rc7. The black K is centralized and so if the rooks come off, then blacks K will be able to capture the passed d pawn before white can capture the passed h pawn and get back to the other side.

Maybe 32 Rf5

Premium Chessgames Member
  Sneaky: 32 Rf5 Rc2+ wins for Black, I believe.
Nov-13-02  drukenknight: maybe I am missing something why not 33 Rf2?
Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: 32.Rf5 Rc2+ 33.Rf2 Rxf2+ 34.Kxf2 Kd5 etc. Pawn ending is simply won for black.
Nov-13-02  drukenknight: then why not 32...Rxa7?
Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: 32...Rxa7? What do you mean exactly?
Nov-15-02  drukenknight: 32...Rxc7 is what I meant, sorry I posted so wrecklessly yesterday, I need to reset mentally.

Anyhow I was hoping white could trade rooks and still be in position to grab blacks h pawn and get back and cover the queening situation. If black is left w/ a RP then maybe he can draw.

But it looks worse than that w/ black maybe keeping both a and b pawns.

Going backs to whites 31/32nd moves, it looks like he's lost time since the rook remains where it was on f1 and black has both side K and R. Perhaps a better move could be played there. Not sure what.

Moving ahead in the game.
What about 32 Kf3? trying to get this K more centralized and deferring the situaion on the h pawn for later.

Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: If you mean 33.Rxc7 then 33...Kxc7 34.Kh3 Kd6 35.Kh4 Kd5 36.Kxh5 Kd4 37.Kg4 Kxd3 is also hopeless for white. Black king is simply master of chessboard. After 32.Kf3 black can play 32...Rc2 with decisive advantage.
Jan-02-04  Benjamin Lau: Andy Soltis considers this to be the best game ever played. It's certainly a great game, but I don't think it was fair for him to compare it to others since it was in correspondence, so it should be excluded just like one would exclude simuls, blitz, rapids, blindfolds, etc.
Feb-22-04  iron maiden: Another wild, crazy, tactical shoot-out that finishes not with mate but with a better ending for the winner ("just" a pawn up).
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: I see this as a good game,but the greatest ever! No way! It is the equivalent of a 6-3 football game. I want fireworks in my chess games! This is art,not laying pipe!
Feb-22-04  Calculoso: Why not 14. gxf3? Also, how do people get the icons of the queen, etc. in their post?
Feb-22-04  Shadout Mapes: 14.gxf3 Bxg3 15.hxg3 Qxg3+ 16.Kh1 Nf4 17.Rg1 Bxf3+
Feb-23-04  Calculoso: Thanks, Shadout Mapes.
Mar-04-04  soberknight: DK, I think you're mistaken to dismiss ...b5 so flippantly. I've played it at least 5 or 6 times, and my opponent usually walks into 6 Bxb5 Qxd5 7 Bxc6+ Qxc6 8 O-O Bb7 with a nice attack for the pawn, for example 9 f3 Bc5+ or 9 Qf3 Qb6. White misses his light-squared bishop, and black's missing b-pawn won't harm him in the middlegame: I usually castle q-side.

Anyway, what do you see in 9 Bxb5+ Nxb5 10 Qa4 Qxe4+ ?

It may be worthwhile to sacrifice a bishop for three pawns in the endgame, but usually not in the early middlegame on a board full of pieces and tactics.

Estrin might have tried Qb3, as everyone who studies this line knows.

Btw, this is my first kibitz ever on this sight. Some comments are too blatant to let pass silently. Btw, I think 1 e4 c5 2 e5 is stupid.

Mar-06-04  drukenknight: yeah ...b5 is okay; what do you think happens in the endgame soberN?
Jun-03-04  gallopingsnail: i have berliner's book. he says that if his analysis is right that the grunfeld will be refuted in a few years.
Jul-30-04  trogdor: White would be winning after 14.Qb3!
Jul-30-04  maoam: <trogdor>

But then 14...Nb4 threatens to burninate the bishop with Rb8 or c6...

Jul-31-04  trogdor: after 14...Nb4 the line should go 15.Rf3 c6 16.Rxf7 cxb5 17.Nc3 Re8 18.Rf1 or something like that, with white burninating black.
Aug-15-04  clocked: <soberknight> your line hangs the Queen
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 7)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 1 OF 7 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CORRESPONDENCE. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
5th Correspondence World Championship Final
by crawfb5
Game 55
from The World's Greatest Chess Games by Supermanikham
Correspondence Brilliancies
by Timothy Glenn Forney
sleepyirv's favorite games
by sleepyirv
100 best games of 20th century by Andrew Soltis
from yPublished Games by Year and Unconfirmed Source by fredthebear
venderbest's black
by venderbest
# 1.) One of the greatest games of all time! ***
from "The 100 Best Games," (of the 20th Century). by LIFE Master AJ
Very Unusual Strange Game
from Nice games and Masterpieces by Queens Gambit
trogdor's favorite games
by trogdor
by keenostuf
The Complications Of A Correspondence Game
from The Capabilities Of The Human Mind by metamorphysis
MKD's Favourite Games
by MKD
from Endgames to be studied. by Milo
100 best games of 20th century by Andrew Soltis
by nakul1964
100 best games of 20th century by Andrew Soltis
from 1960s- The Rise of Fredthebear & Fischer King by fredthebear
MIFoguelman's favorite games
by MIFoguelman
jarm's favorite games
by jarm
study game & comments
from swclark25's favorite games by swclark25
Ulvestad Italian
from Fun in the Open Games by SJP

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC