chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Harlow Bussey Daly vs Franklin Knowles Young
10th PNCCA Tournament Semi-Final (1907), Correspondence
Vienna Game: Vienna Gambit. Main Line (C29)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 79 more games of H Daly
sac: 16...Rd8 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can learn a lot about this site (and chess in general) by reading the Chessgames Help Page. If you need help with premium features, please see the Premium Membership Help Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Nov-12-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  jahhaj: Is this game for real? Even for correspondence chess the quality of play seems exceptional. In the whole tactical sequence from 11...Qxd4 to 25...Kxd6 the only moves you can clearly criticize are the initial 11...Qxd4 (11...Qh6 and Black is a piece ahead) and 24.Qd6+ (24.Qxe5 is to be preferred although White's still in trouble).

Neither of these two are top class masters and Young was an eccentric, so I just wondered.

Feb-28-11  Amarande: 24 Qxe5 appears to be illegal: White's trying to take a White Pawn. I'm guessing you mean 24 Qxe4, and, indeed, I'm not exactly sure what the clear-cut winning plan is after 24 ... Qxe4+ 25 Kb2 (now Black cannot take the e-pawn as there is 26 Re1 - either Rook - and White would win). In fact it's hard to see that position as anything other than even: the material is virtually even (depending on your assessment of Q v. 2R with equal Pawns) and while Black has a temporary advantage on account of a more active Queen I don't see anything immediate coming of it: 25 ... Qe2+ 26 Kb3 Qb5+ (he still can't take the Pawn) 27 Kc2 is going nowhere fast, nor does 25 ... Qg2+ snag anything, and if Black takes the time to get his King off of the e-file in order to threaten Qxe5, then 26 Rae1 looks to hold everything ...

In the final position, I would have probably played on a couple of moves as White, as there's a slight glimmer: 40 Rc3+ Kb4 41 Rb3+ and now Black must be sure to play the winning 41 ... Ka5! (after which White has no more tricks: 42 Rb5+ Kxa4 and Black is safely winning), but 41 ... Kxa4??? of course allows a draw (42 Ra3+, and the perpetual is almost perfect in its beauty, Black's Pawn pleasingly blocking the one square by which Black's King could hope to break free of the cage created by White's King and d6-Rook). At correspondence, it's probably too much to hope for, but it's worth a shot ...

Feb-28-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: <Amarande: In the final position:


click for larger view

I would have probably played on a couple of moves as White, as there's a slight glimmer: 40 Rc3+ Kb4 41 Rb3+ and now Black must be sure to play the winning 41 ... Ka5! (after which White has no more tricks: 42 Rb5+ Kxa4 and Black is safely winning), but 41 ... Kxa4???


click for larger view

of course allows a draw (42 Ra3+, and the perpetual is almost perfect in its beauty, Black's Pawn pleasingly blocking the one square by which Black's King could hope to break free of the cage created by White's King and d6-Rook)>

After <41...Kxa4>, that would indeed be a lovely perpetual. So lovely, I think even Black would have been satisfied with it.

I agree that Daly might as well have gone for it. But he still had over 60 years of chess ahead of him, and was probably anxious to get started.

Mar-05-12  thendcomes: After 41 ... Kxa4??, Ra6#
Jan-05-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: Another game that needs am accirate date.

"1911" probably comes from its publication in the "American Chess Bulletin, December 1911, p. 278, as part of a report giving the final results of the tenth annual Pillsbury National Correspondence Chess Association annual tournament, which was won by Young.

The thought of his postcards staggers the imagination.

ACB does not give the date of the tournament, but has this headnote to the game:

<"The following reprinted from Lasker's Chess Magazine, was played in the second round of the semi-finals of the foregoing tournament...">

The point being that :asker's Chess Magazine ceased publication in June, 1909, so the game must have been played some time before that date.

That's about as far as I can take it, though.

Jan-07-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: I have learned that the game appears in Lasker's Chess Magazine, volume 6, May-October 1907, p. 259-260. .

In the absence of further information, I'm changing the date to 1907 for now. Though it may have actually started in 1906, the page numbers indicate it was published near the end of the year. Also, the game probably moved relatively quickly since oth players lived in the Boston area.

Jan-07-19  Deus Ex Alekhina: Phony, how do I access the archives of Michigan Chess? I don't see a way to do it now, but there was a way to see back issues previously. Do you have a FIDE rating? I think FIDE sends out some official notification if you become eligible for a title, not sure what all those title (CM, FM, NM, IM) mean, rating-wise.
Jan-07-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: Wish Ii knew how to access the MCA archives. For years, they were attached to a page that wasn't being update, and I guess it finally died completely.

I had a FIDE rating at one point that wea actually higher than my USCF rating. But it seems to have expired. Doesn't matter, since I will probably never play again.

Jan-07-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <DEA>, perhaps <zanzibar> has some bright ideas--it is indeed regrettable that access is no longer possible.
Jan-07-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  zanzibar: <perf>, <pb> this pops up near the top of a google search:

http://www.chessarch.com/mca/

Looks incomplete, but it's a start.

.

Jan-07-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  jnpope: I know the MCA moved the website to a few different servers over the years after I gave up being the webmaster in 2006. I kept paying for the old server which I believe they linked to via IP address as a sort of archive. I kept tabs on things periodically and once I saw that they were no longer linking to the old server I stopped paying for it and it was decommissioned.

The issues of the Michigan Chess Bulletin that I scanned are still available for download here: http://www.chessarch.com/mca/index....

I think the old issues of Michigan Chess Online are still reachable via archive.org:

https://web.archive.org/web/2006121...

Jan-07-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  jnpope: I think I have copies of everything on that checklist posted at Chessarch... I really need to finishing scanning those things in someday...
Jan-07-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  zanzibar: <<jnpope> I really need to finishing scanning those things in someday...>

Sounds like me...

Thanks for your reply (and everything else you've done for the community at large!).

Oh, and Happy New Years.

Jan-08-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: <jnpope> My thanks as well. I downloaded a number of the archived issues from the 70s-90s, but didn't get them all. Drat, drat and double drat.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>
This game is type: CORRESPONDENCE (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Lasker's Chess Magazine, volume 6, May-October 1907, p. 259-260
from Published Games by Year and Unconfirmed Source 4 by fredthebear
Lasker's Chess Magazine, volume 6, May-October 1907, p. 259-260
from Prom Dates Play Chess All Knight at FTB's Place by fredthebear
Forever Young
from Brilliancies By "Unknowns" by TheAlchemist
Alekhine
by obrit
Bookmarked games 2
by Cushion
[Game 148] Correspondence Chess, p. 344
from The Fireside Book of Chess by Phony Benoni
December,p. 278 [Game 282 / 2318]
from American Chess Bulletin 1911 by Phony Benoni


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC