Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Wilhelm Steinitz vs Emanuel Lasker
Steinitz - Lasker World Championship Match (1894), Montreal CAN, rd 6, Mar-29
Italian Game: Classical Variation. Greco Gambit (C53)  ·  1/2-1/2


explore this opening
find similar games 45 more Steinitz/Lasker games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: Wow! Fascinating battle.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Calli: Steinitz thought 25.Qxc4+ followed by a6 was more promising.
Feb-29-08  Knight13: 54. Kg5? Dude, come on, at least try g4.
Nov-27-08  Edeltalent: <Knight13> Well, it's not as if black could do anything wrong after g4. The game is a draw already.
Dec-09-08  nimh: ...Rxb2 should have been played move earlier.


click for larger view

Rybka 3 w32:
15 01:05,844 4.546.883 71.185 +2,53 Rxb2 Qc8+ Nf8 Nf4 g5 Qg4 h6 h4 Qd7 Qxd7 Nxd7 Nd5 Kf7 hxg5 hxg5 e5 Rd2 Nc3 Rxd4 Nb5 Rd2 Nd6+ Ke6 Nxc4 Re2 Kg1 Nxe5 Nxe5 Kxe5 Kf1 Rd2

16 01:29,421 6.305.374 72.546 +2,59 Rxb2 Qc8+ Nf8 Nf4 g5 Qg4 h6 h4 Qd7 Qxd7 Nxd7 Nd5 Kf7 hxg5 hxg5 e5 Rd2 Nc3 Rxd4 Nb5 Rd2 Nd6+ Ke6 Nxc4 Re2 Na5 Nxe5 Nb3 Kf6 Nd4 Rd2

17 01:53,015 8.022.039 72.957 +2,59 Rxb2 Qc8+ Nf8 Nf4 g5 Qg4 h6 h4 Qd7 Qxd7 Nxd7 Nd5 Kf7 hxg5 hxg5 e5 Rd2 Nc3 Rxd4 Nb5 Rd2 Nd6+ Ke6 Nxc4 Re2 Na5 Nxe5 Nb3 Kf6 Nd4 Rd2

18+ 04:36,812 20.294.998 75.190 +2,79 Rxb2

18+ 07:10,499 32.817.072 78.138 +2,99 Rxb2

18 12:07,843 56.208.964 79.125 +3,21 Rxb2 Qc8+ Nf8 Nf4 g5 Qg4 h6 h4 Qd7 Qxd7 Nxd7 Nd5 Kf7 e5 gxh4 gxh4 Rd2 Nc3 Rxd4 Nb5 Rxh4+ Kg3 Rh5 Nd6+ Ke6 Nxc4 Nxe5 Ne3 Rg5+ Kh3

Best move: Rxb2, Value: +3,21, Depth: 18, Time: 15:09,448, 70.796.843 Nodes, 79.752 N/sec.

Jan-06-16  Retireborn: Different sources give Lasker's 10th move as ...f5 or ...f6. Of course it makes no difference to the rest of the game, but does anybody have a definitive answer?
Jan-06-16  thomastonk: <Retireborn> You can find the answer to such questions easily by means of the "Timeline Tool" from chessarch:

You will find, for example, Lasker's comments on the adjourned game in the 'New York Daily Tribune' and the 'New York Sun' of March 30, 1894. The game is also published in several other newspapers in the following days. I always see 10.. P-B4, i.e. 10.. f5.

Jan-06-16  Retireborn: <thomas> Many thanks for that, it looks like a tremendous resource!

The source I am using for Lasker games (Soloviev/Convekta) does have a number of annoying notation errors in it (for example they also give White's 50th as Qc3 instead of Qc5.)

I am not sure if they make these mistakes themselves or if they are relying on Russian press reports which did not convey the moves accurately.

Jan-06-16  thomastonk: <Retireborn: I am not sure if they make these mistakes themselves ...> During my sabbatical in 2014 I made extensive game score comparisons of Lasker's games in three commercial databases, among them Convekta's database. I cannot talk here too much about this, but I found to my surprise that most differences came from old sources and not from the digitisation process.
Jan-06-16  Retireborn: <thomas> Thanks again. As I'm using Convekta to work (rather slowly!) through the Steinitz v Lasker matches, I'll be sure to compare their scores with other sources whenever possible.
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <retireborn> If you have no shortage of time, Huebner's book is quite a companion for the first match.

Jan-06-16  Retireborn: <keypusher> Thanks for that recommendation - I've added it to my list.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Game 6, Match tied 2-2 (3-3)
from 1894 World Chess Championship by Penguincw
Lasker vs. Steinitz
by c3230
Match Lasker!
by amadeus
Game 28
from Manual of Chess (Lasker) by Qindarka
Greco Gambit
from Italian Game by inlimbo777
Undisputed Champions
by RubenGlueck
Game 28
from Manual of Chess (Lasker) by isfsam
Match Steinitz!
by amadeus

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC