Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Jose Raul Capablanca vs Emanuel Lasker
Lasker - Capablanca World Championship Match (1921), Havana CUB, rd 1, Mar-15
Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense. Capablanca Variation (D63)  ·  1/2-1/2


Annotations by Jose Raul Capablanca.      [26 more games annotated by Capablanca]

explore this opening
find similar games 23 more Capablanca/Lasker games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: The Olga viewer allows you to get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" link on the lower right.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Sep-22-10  soothsayer8: <Knight13> It's possible Capablanca was the closest there ever was to a human chess computer ;)
Premium Chessgames Member
  MindCtrol9: Knight13:Yes,he was not a computer,but remember he was called "The Chess Machine".He could calculate many moves ahead,and different variations.
Jan-01-11  Rook e2: Maybe 42 Kc5 Rd3 43 Rf2 g4 44 Kb6
I haven't checked with a computer yet but it might win
Apr-08-11  bronkenstein: Ty for link , slowlylearner :) nice vid.
Premium Chessgames Member
  madlydeeply: AH c'mon now! No more of this "Capa was a natural player"! He clearly analyzed this opening at home, no? I say all his comments up to move sixteen were a result of opening prep. I think he would say he "didn't prepare" as a way to psych out his opponents. His Capa cult of personality.
Oct-24-12  sillybilly47: I know how it ends but not a bad start for the good doctor.
Oct-31-12  Conrad93: Lasker had a chance for a better game with either 19...c4! or 19...d4!
Dec-19-12  Conrad93: Capablanca's comments are so biased.
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: <Conrad93>
What's the follow-up after 19...c4 20. Qc3? Looks to me like this helps White more than Black.

This actually does look pretty interesting. Capa claims it would have failed, but 19...d4 20. Qa3 Ng4 21. Ng3 Rbc8 looks fine for Black.

Dec-19-12  Conrad93: BeatGiant, the analysis was done by Rybka.

The advantage goes to black after 19...c4.

After 20.Qc3 white's position is cramped.

Dec-19-12  Conrad93:

click for larger view

19...c4! 20.Qc3 Ne4 21.Qa5!Rdc8 22.Nc3 f5
23.Nf3 Rc5 24.Qa3 Qc7 25.Na4 Ra5!

click for larger view

Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: <Conrad93>
Thanks, but I wasn't convinced by a few of White's moves in Rybka's line. Why not simply 19...c4 20. Qc3 Ne4 <21. Qd4>, for example?
Dec-19-12  Conrad93:

click for larger view

21.Qd4 Bc6! 22.b3 Rb4 23.Qb2 Rb8 24.Qc1 Qf6! 25.Nf3 g5!?

click for larger view

I think black is much better off.

Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: <Conrad93>
I remain unconvinced. On 19...c4 20. Qc3 Ne4 21. Qd4 Bc6, simply <22. Rb1> appears to parry all threats.
Dec-20-12  Conrad93: Apparently not. 22.Rb1 is countered by 22...a5 or 22...Ba4 when black is doing much better. It's a very passive move.
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: <Conrad93>
I don't see why <black is doing much better> in the line you posted. True, Black has the momentary appearance of some piece activity, but I don't see any major follw-up. Meanwhile, the c-pawn and d-pawn are a frozen weakness.
Dec-20-12  Conrad93: Giant, the c and d pawn are very strong.
You are looking at the game like a patzer.
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: <Conrad93>
<c and d pawn are very strong> Could you post something informative about your reasons? Do you say that just because <Rybka> gave Black a plus there?

I'll post a sample line illustrating my belief about the position:

19...c4 20. Qc3 Ne4 21. Qd4 Bc6 22. Rb1 a5 <23. Nc3> Nxc3 24. Qxc3 Bd7 25. Rd2 Bf5 26. Rbd1

White has visible pressure on the c and d pawns (<27. Qxc4> is a threat).

Dec-21-12  Conrad93: Your line is faulty.

I'll analyze later. Too tired for now.

Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: Capablanca: "<19...Ne4. All the attacks beginning either with Ng4 or d4 would have failed.>" He could be right! It's a pity he didn't give a few moves of analysis.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Marmot PFL: <Capablanca writes, "Kc5 was too risky. The way to win was not at all clear and I even thought that with that move Black might win.">

The younger Capablanca would take risks to win and make a name for himself, but by the 1920s he was already becoming risk averse.

Premium Chessgames Member
  edmundo51: Why not simply 19...c4 20. Qc3 Ne4 <21. Qd4 Bc6 and fine 22.f3 if 22...Ba4 23.fe4 B:c2 24. N:c2 and white must win.
Dec-06-17  nacional100: I created a lichess study with my own analysis of the game. I'm just an amateur trying to improve, and haven't used CPU analysis. Please be welcome to take a look and provide comments or feedback.

Premium Chessgames Member
  maxi: <Conrad93> Really you shouldn't use "biased" in relation to Capa's comments. You can say that he had a very high opinion of his own ability, you can say that sometimes he made analytic mistakes, but you shouldn't use that word. Capa was as objective as he could be as far as chess positions and moves are concerned. In general I learn a lot from this comments, but, for a player of his strength, he made too many mistakes in his notes.
Dec-06-17  RookFile: Lasker played a nice game here. His chess had a dynamic quality to it. I'm sure the computer finds improvements for both sides. It always does.

Capa presented numerous losses of his in Chess Fundamentals. That's more objective than most people get.

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 3)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
+4 -0 =10 vs. Lasker (World Match, Havana)
from Match Capablanca! by amadeus
R+4ps vs R+4ps
by Pawsome
WCC: Lasker-Capablanca 1921
by WCC Editing Project
Capablanca vs Lasker WCM 1921
by ilcca
Game 1, Match tied 1/2-1/2 (0-0)
from 1921 World Chess Championship by Penguincw
rook ending
from jsteward's favorite games by jlsteward
Annotated by Capablanca !
from Chess gives joy and insight ......... by arielbekarov
brainiac9129's favorite games
by brainiac9129
Josť Capablanca's Rook Endings
by Knight Pawn
All Hail Emanuel
by iron maiden
World Championship analysis
by nacional100
On the shoulders of giants
by ughaibu
+0 -4 =10 vs. Capablanca (Havana, 1921)
from Match Lasker! by amadeus
96e The Unbearable Lightness of rook endgames 5
by whiteshark
from gopi2004's favorite games by gopi2004
from Match Lasker-Capablanca by Nobis
Kale Oyunsonlari
by tristanfermat
Nietzowitsch's favorite games no 2
by Nietzowitsch
51c Middlegames - Black's Hanging Pawns
by whiteshark
by 67JediChessMaster
plus 3 more collections (not shown)

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2018, Chessgames Services LLC