chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

A Dzurny vs S Saul
"Dzurny's End in Lovers Meeting" (game of the day Jun-14-2010)
New York (1989), New York, NY USA
Caro-Kann Defense: Karpov Variation (B17)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games more games of A Dzurny
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: At the top of the page we display the common English name for the opening, followed by the ECO code (e.g. "B17"). The ECO codes are links that take you to opening pages.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jun-14-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  dzechiel: This is a good example of a game that does not belong in this database.

Both players appear to be non-notables and the play is truly less than inspired. It was played in New York in 1989, but so were a zillion other poorly played games.

So, what credentials does this game have to appear in this database? Anyone?

Jun-14-10  Astardis: Brings back painful memories... I was at the bottom end of this mate more than once! Just didn't expect a mate in 7 from the calm Caro-Kann after making perfectly normal moves :)
Jun-14-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  Peligroso Patzer: <dzechiel: ***

So, what credentials does this game have to appear in this database? Anyone?>

It demonstrates a trap that should be well-known, but apparently was unknown to S. Saul.

A propos the pun, every wise man's son doth know not to play 6. ... g6 in this line.

Jun-14-10  JonathanJ: i won so many games with this trap... yawn...
Jun-14-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  An Englishman: Good Evening: I don't know--a pun this inspired ought to justify the inclusion of a game like this in the database.
Jun-14-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  Once: It's the chess equivalent of "It's a wonderful life" (if you are American) or "The Great Escape" (if you are British).

Yes, we old-timers have seen it a gazillion times before. It's a very well know low-grade trap. But people are falling for it all the time, so for someone it will be new. Let's not grumble if it helps at least one person today.

Remember, George: no man is a failure who has friends.

Jun-14-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  watwinc: There's a Keres game here - the story is, he won with white, went out and played tennis all afternoon and had horrible sunburn next day. An Olympiad, I think ...
Jun-14-10  newzild: I also think the game shouldn't be in the database. The "rule" is meant to be that one player should be elo 2200 or above. Including lower-rated games in the database reduces the validity and usefulness of the openings explorer.
Jun-14-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: chessgames.com statistics - they are mind-boggling...
Jun-14-10  melianis: M Vodiska vs Fejes, 1983
Jun-14-10  Omnishambles: Well, it was new to me. At least there is one less way I might be ninja-mated in future.
Jun-14-10  atakantmac: Why did white play Bd3?
Jun-14-10  Cardinal Fang: I am guessing White played Bd3 to make the intention behind Qe2 less glaringly obvious - unlike in the Vodiska-Fejes game which, to add insult to injury, was by correspondence.
Jun-14-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: Looking at the games with similar gid numbers (see the link in the window at the top of your screen), it becomes obvious that somebody found a file of short games and submitted them <en masse> simply because they were short games.

Some of them, such as the one with the next highest gid (W Waagmeester vs Van Arkel, 1989), are probably not even short games, but incomplete scores. Sumbitters should check this sort of thing, but computer databases make it all too easy to skip that vital step.

Jun-14-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: A smothered-type mate! It's brevity is good compensation for the lack of a queen sac.

The earliest mate of this type is

1c3 ♘c6 2 e4 ♘b4 3 ♘e2 ♘d3#


click for larger view

/

Jun-14-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  chrisowen: Qe2 line really docks the point. Black is cruising until 6..g6 gaffed in the line. Whaling away Dzurny brace support got him hook line and sinker. White sees it roughly the danger posed by Nd6# defence is breached. Red light goes on and any harbouring thoughts dont linger. Black took a smoking streetlight people.
Jun-14-10  goodevans: Given that today's puzzle is aimed at beginners, I was very disappointed to find that the GOTD was also aimed at the novice. However, when I read <Phony Benoni>'s kibitz I decided to play through a few of these Brief Encounters (to ape <Once>'s film references).

My advice: Don't do it. It's addictive!

D Ferguson vs B Wall, 1989 is truly awful. The end of P Leisebein vs H Tuchtenhagen, 1989 would, however, make a good puzzle.

With only a casual interest in chess, I'm glad I came upon these. I can fully understand why those with a more serious interest would want them removed.

Jun-14-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  Once: <atakantmac: Why did white play Bd3?>

There's actually a little bit of common sense in that move. After 4...Nd7


click for larger view

... the quickest way to get into the trap is to play 5. Qe2. Now, if black plays on autopilot with 5...Ngf6, white gets to play his trick of 6. Nd6#.

But what if black knows the trick and plays something else? Say 5...Qc7 or 5...e6? Then the queen on e2 can look pretty silly, as it blocks in the Bf1. And g3/ Bg2 doesn't look too appealling as the black b7/c6 pawn barrier blocks fun along the long diagonal.

So white delays his Qe2 move for one turn, develops with Bd3 instead and hopes that the trap is still there one move later. And if black sidesteps the trap white still has a reasonable setup to play from.

Jun-14-10  reztap: I won a rapid game almost the same as this. I played Q-e2 instead of b d3. My opponent beat me in a regular game a couple of years later. C'est la vie.
Jun-14-10  ragtime.willy: Weak game, but nice to see a Shakespeare reference. And not a particularly well known one at that!
Oct-23-10  Markcf: I played a game on fics and it went like this..1e4 e5,2Nf3 d6,3.d4 exd4 4.Nxd4 ,c6 5.Bb5# Bd7 6.BxB# NxB 7.Nf5 Ngd7......8.Nd6 mate....and i weren't even playing blitz,but my 1900 rated opponent were tryin to!!! Fool...
Apr-03-11  technical draw: <Markcf> Cool game. It's always good to beat a higher rated player. BTW are you still on benefits? I ask because after you didn't pay your rent for a year I thought they might suspend the benefits. I hope not. I hear you can get a cell phone too, check it out. Later.
May-19-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: Better call S Saul

I Kann mate it Legal.

Mar-24-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  louispaulsen88888888: What is the big deal whether itís in the database or not. Itís fun to play out.
Itís instructive.
You can do it in your head. No need to set up board and pieces. It takes one minute to look at.
May-09-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  sea7kenp: King: "Hey! It's getting Stuffy in here!"
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
"Dzurny's End in Lovers Meeting"
from A estudiar by Hagen von Tronje
7 move mate
from Chess Miniatures, Collection I by nionios
Caro-Kann Def: Karpov Var (B17) 1-0 Smothered mate
from yFredthebear's Knight Checkmate Patterns & Traps by fredthebear
Caro-Kann Def: Karpov Var (B17) 1-0 Smothered mate
from C-K Def Collected by Fredthebear by fredthebear
zz85#__How to get away with Checkmate otb
by whiteshark
Blok's Prefered Miniatures
by Antonius Blok
June 14: Dzurny's End in Lovers Meeting
from Game of the Day 2010 by Phony Benoni
Caro-Kann Defense: Karpov Variation
from yepyeni by deniznba
7 move mate
from Chess Miniatures, Collection I by wwall
ck 1-0 7 drag.SI!
from 2010 by xfer
Smothered mate in 7 moves
from Pawnpusher1's Instructional Games by Pawnpusher1


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC