chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Larry Melvyn Evans vs Samuel Reshevsky
"The Mother of All Swindles" (game of the day May-12-2013)
US Championship (1963/64), New York, NY USA, rd 9, Dec-29
Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal. Gligoric System Bronstein Variation (E55)  ·  1/2-1/2
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 23 more Larry Evans/Reshevsky games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 5 OF 5 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Mar-13-11  Pensive: I saw this game in my first chess book, Chess Strategy from A to Z, by Jeremy Silman. At the time, I wondered how this game was a stalemate because Silman showed the stalemate variation starting with 48...Qxg3, except the pawn was shown on h3, rather than its correct placement on h4.
Apr-10-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  wordfunph: according to GM Evans..

Reshevsky blanched and smiled wryly. With unseemly glee, I strained to hear him curse himself under his breath. He uttered just one word: "Stupid!"

Aug-14-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: "Evans, down a piece and threatened with 48 ... Re1#, tried 48 h4! tempting Reshevsky into 48 ... Qxg3?? Evans thereupon forced a draw with 49 Qg8+!! Kxg8 50 Rxg7+! If either the Black king or queen takes the rook, White is stalemated, but if Black refuses the rook, White keeps on checking from the 7th rank until Black concedes a perpetual or allows the stalemate.

<A beautiful idea, but in a presentation far from ideal. For one thing, the "Swindle" part of the name indicates that Evans could only achieve this conclusion thanks to the gross blunder 48 ... Qxg3?? by his opponent-- after 48 ... Qf6! 49 Rd8 Ng6 White could resign. (The "Century" part also tells us something: this kind of resource is very rare in practical play. Not, however, literally once in a hundred years-- recall that Reshevsky fell into a similar trap against Pilnik only a few years earlier, a trap that also became known as the "Swindle of the Century" for a while; the even more impressive stalemate swindle of Beliavsky vs Christiansen, 1987 now seems destined for the same title.) For another, after 48 ... Qxg3?? Evans could also have drawn by 49 Qg8+! (or 49 Qh8+!) Kxg8 50 Rd8+ leading to the same conclusion of stalemate or perpetual check by the desperado rook, so the drawing line is not unique. Lastly, the b-pawns are superfluous, since the entire combination works just as well without them. Let us try to fix those flaws:"> ...

Endgame Explorations by Noam Elkies
http://www.permutationpuzzles.org/c...

Aug-28-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  Landman: <whiteshark> Hmm. The position in Elkies' column doesn't match the game as given here on Chessgames. Here, wR is on d7 instead of f7, and instead of 48.h2-h4 the move is 47.h3-h4. Has anyone seen an alternate score for this game?
Aug-28-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <the even more impressive stalemate swindle of Beliavsky vs Christiansen, 1987 now seems destined for the same title.)>

Yes, yes, a thousand times yes. Beliavsky-Christiansen is one of the very greatest swindles, quite possibly <the> greatest swindle, ever.

Nov-13-11  knighterrant999: Let's not play semantics and ask whether this is the swindle of the century or the blunder of the century; in either case it is quite a charming half point save.
Nov-13-11  Petrosianic: It's not semantics, because I'd never consider the game for Blunder of the Century (there are many, much more egregious ones than Qxg3), but I might consider it for Swindle of the Century. Therefore, they aren't the same thing.
Mar-09-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: Melvyn was winning until he missed 24...Nxc5.
Mar-09-12  BwanaVa: Lets not forget Reshevsky often had these shortsighted eps...consider another swindle:

C Pilnick vs Reshevsky, 1942

Mar-13-12  RookFile: This wasn't a good tournament for Reshevsky. His father in law died, and he made a few mistakes in this tournament.
Aug-24-12  The Last Straw: <chessgames.com> is teasing Reshevsky by marking this as one of his notable games. But again, this is in so many game collections.
Aug-24-12  Petrosianic: If this isn't a notable game, I don't know what is. It doesn't say "Best Games".
Aug-24-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: <The Last Straw> The "Notable Games" list is based on the number of times a game appears in a collection, with the restriction that the player must win or draw the game. Note that this is one of Evans' Notable Games as well.

Another example is D Byrne vs Fischer, 1956, the most collected game in the database. It appears on Fischer's list, but not on Donald Byrne's because he lost it.

May-12-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: This isn't "The Mother of All Swindles." That would be Beliavsky vs Christiansen, 1987. Marshall vs G Marco, 1904 is also a better swindle than this one. And the greatest stalemating combination ever was seen recently in Shredder vs Gull, 2013.

Trivia question: where was this game first called "The Swindle of the Century"? Anyone? <Phony Benoni>?

May-12-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: <FSR> I have a vague memory of Evans himself referring to it that way. At the time he was editing the <American Chess Quarterly>, and it may have appeared there. But I can't be sure.
May-12-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <Phony Benoni> Very good! We have a winner!
May-12-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: For more fine swindles, see Game Collection: Outrageous swindles.
May-12-13  scormus: <FSR: ... the greatest stalemating combination ever was seen recently in Shredder vs Gull, 2013.>

I'd agree with you if it wasn't between computers. I'd also agree with you if I hadn't missed it when it was POTD ;)

May-12-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eggman: The greatest "swindle" combination ever played:


click for larger view

Farges-Rakhinshteyn, Toronto, 1984.
White to play.

For the solution, see my chess forum.

May-12-13  newzild: <Eggman>

Let me guess:

1. Rxg6+ Kxg6
2. Qf6+ Kh7
3. Rg3 Rg8
4. Rg7+ Rxg7
5. Qxh6+ Kg8
6. Qh8+ Kxh8 Stalemate

May-12-13  jusmail: Any great swindles in correspondence chess?
May-13-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: Sammy was caught at least twice in a stalemate swindle:Pilnick got him in 92 moves!
May-13-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <Eggman>: Are Yves Farges or Fima Rakhinsteyn still active? I remember them from my visit for the Toronto Intenational in July 1984, though we never met at the board.
May-13-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eggman: <perfidious> Farges, no; Rakhinshteyn played as recently as 2010 after a period of inactivity. He'd be pretty old by now, though.
Jul-17-13  jerseybob: PolishPentium: If 43.Ra6,Qg5 wins. The double atack has been removed from d7. Reshevsky's play until the blunder is a classic; check out the cat-and-mouse game he plays on moves 20 and 21 eventually winning the c-pawn. This is how to play the Nimzo. Unfortunately, as in his first game against Botvinnik in the 1948 World Title Tourney, also a Nimzo, he throws away the fruits of his play.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 5)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 5 OF 5 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Puzzling endings
by kidster
Echoside's favorite games
by Echoside
April 2: The Swindle of the Century
from Game of the Day 2006 by Phony Benoni
‘The trap of the Century’ –Evans
from Stalemate! by capanegra
One Player Was Awake, Anyway...
by perfidious
The Huge Save
from The best games of chess ever played! by chesscrazy
‘The trap of the Century’ –Evans
from Stalemate! by Capanegra by Octavia
Swindled into a capture stalemate or immune perpetual check
from Rounders I Rearranged by fredthebear
US Championship 1963/64
by suenteus po 147
collection 3
by pixing
Swindled into a capture stalemate or immune perpetual check
from 1960s- The Lasting War by fredthebear
Evans' Gambit Swindles Sammy
from Major Sacrifices by BishopofBlunder
Swindler swindled.
from Lovely draw's by nikolaas
"The Swindle of the Century"
from The Greatest Games of All time 2 by addiction to chess
THE MOTHER OF ALL SWINDLES
from LULLABY NIGHT # 3 by LULLABY NIGHT
The Swindle of the Century
from Exciting, Original, Unusual And Other Draws by TheAlchemist
barb's favorite games 3
by barb
"Swindle of the Century," but Beliavsky-Christiansen is better
from Outrageous swindles by FSR
blackjacki2's favorite games
by blackjacki2
wunmu's favorite games
by wunmu
plus 90 more collections (not shown)


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC