chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Garry Kasparov vs Vladimir Kramnik
Kasparov - Kramnik Classical World Championship Match (2000), London ENG, rd 7, Oct-19
English Opening: Symmetrical. Anti-Benoni Variation (A31)  ·  1/2-1/2
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 121 more Kasparov/Kramnik games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If you do not want to read posts by a certain member, put them on your ignore list.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Apr-04-05  Karpova: <clocked>
a fifth reason is that kasparov saw that he couldn't achieve anything with 1.c4 also. he tried something new (na4) but immediately realised that this would be useless anyway (since being no great novelty)
Apr-04-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eric Schiller: <all> Anyone who saw Kasparov just before the game knows that he was clearly greatly distracted by a non-chess matter. It was not appropriate for me, as arbiter, to ask why, so I didn't. He left quickly after the game. In many matches, things going on off the board affected some games, not just in Iceland 72. Perhaps Kasparov will write of such things in a future book, covering all of his matches.
Apr-05-05  Lawrence: Thanks, Mr. Schiller, it's great having you on board here for your personal recollections of things like that, appreciated by all of us.
Apr-05-05  Stevens: <ericschiller> yes, i've also read that off the board private matters were affecting Kasparov a lot before and during this match which upset his preperation and his play. Kramnik still beat him fair and square though (in the non pre arranged games ;-), but oh for a rematch... *sigh*
Jun-01-05  Heavy Metal Thunder: 11 moves, what a joke.
Oct-04-05  Virus Malaise: Even Kasparov got infected by Kramnik´s Malaise!!!!!!!!!

Kramnik disease to draw its very dangerous, it can kill passion for truly chess, even with Kasparov!!!!!!!!

....

Oct-04-05  Virus Malaise: A salute to my friend <hintza>

Come see your idols malaise!!!!

Oct-04-05  aw1988: By the way, do you realize something? Yes, Kramnik seems to have a higher draw percentage than most people. Yet, who makes the draws? It is, call me crazy, mutual consent. Guess what? Kramnik offered a draw on move 11. Malaise Kramnik... except... wait, Kasparov, whom you adore so much, ACCEPTED. It's not just Kramnik. If Kasparov wanted to fight on, he had every right to do so, and may have won. That isn't the point. Kasparov agreed the position was a draw, and so it is.
Jan-29-06  Karpova: <aw1988:[...]Kramnik offered a draw on move 11.[...]>

it's obvious that kasparov offered the draw, not kramnik. all according to the rules: you have to make a move when offering the draw and who made the last move - kasparov

Jan-29-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eric Schiller: <Karpova> Sorry to disappoint you but many short draws are not done according to the rules and Kasparov was infamous for this. That's why I introduced a device at the match where a draw offer had to be accompanied by switching on a light, with buttons for each player. This device has been proposed as a FIDE rule change.

It is important for the public, press and arbiters to know that a draw is offered, and in previous Kasparov matches the press kept hunting me down to inquire about who offered the draw. I often had to ask Garry about it. So for the Kramnik match we finally introduced the device, which I first suggested back in 1986! The device is included in Stewart Reuben's invaluable Chess Organiser's handbook and I discuss it whenever I teach a course for Arbiters, as I have here in Gibraltar for the GIBTELECOM Chess Festival.

Jan-29-06  Akavall: I think draw offers (if known) should be included in the PGN, I believe it would add insight about the game.
Jan-29-06  Jim Bartle: Absolutely agree. Should be a little smiley-face symbol, or two hands shaking.
Jan-29-06  Karpova: <Eric Schiller>

Okay, so this short draw was not according to the rules. but it was still kasparov who offered the draw, wasn't it? i remember that game and kasparov's disappointment after 11.na4

Jan-29-06  Jim Bartle: This one's all on Kasparov. He was a point behind in the match and had white.
Oct-15-06  Bufon: <aw1988:Kramnik offered a draw on move 11.>

And made Kasparov accept it!!

Oct-25-06  crazy monk: A very unprepare and scared Kasparov.
Oct-25-06  ahmadov: So, who said that Kasparov did not like short draws?
Mar-21-07  themanfrommanila: Kasparov was obviously dumping the match, plain and simple.
Dec-18-07  juandadamo: Found some thoughts in
http://www.ishipress.com/kk-match.htm
Mar-19-08  ToTheKings: I found this quote on chessbase and laughed so hard my sides hurt:

"Mark Vogan, Houston, TX, USA
By the way, you will not see GM draws in match play; they only occur in tournaments."

http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail...

Jul-03-08  Abejorral: What is this crap ?? <chessgames> shoudnt mind to publish this
Sep-11-08  Karpova: Vladimir Kramnik: <Zhenya [Evgeny Bareev] had suggested the move 4...a6 to me. Here the lack of confidence in himself that Kasparov was showing made a difference. He wasn't ready to play things by ear, he wanted to obtain an advantage in the opening, and he wasn't ready to play an equal position. He didn't know the exact move order and he was afraid to sacrifice a pawn. He offered a draw when the position was quite promising for me, plus I had about 40 minutes more time left. I thought about it, whether or not to play on, but I decided that a short draw as White would be extremely unpleasant for him. If we continued playing, the game, most likely, would still end in a draw, but the after-taste for Kasparov would be different after a long game. So I agreed.>

Bareev, Evgeny & Levitov, Ilya: "From London to Elista", Alkmaar, 2007, page 108

Oct-01-08  niceforkingmove: Mr. Schiller
How could it be that "anyone who saw Kasparov just before the game knows that he was clearly greatly distracted by a non-chess matter" ? I suppose that one can observe certain actions that show Mr. Kasparov was distracted or upset. But how would one rule out the possibility that those actions were due to the fact that he is losing this match? I'm sincerely interested.

Please tell us what you observed.

Feb-26-10  Alphastar: I recently got into this same opening variation in a club team match, and I also played 7. Qd3? and the same up to move 10.

The position is rather unpleasant for white because there is no clear plan. I tried 11. Bg5?! followed by e3 and Qe2, had to give up the bishop pair after ..h6, and my opponent eventually squeezed out a win in Karpovian style. 11. Na4 is probably better, as is 11. b3 developing the bishop to b2. But in any case black has a very solid position with well-coordinated pieces.

As I have the book "From London to Elista" I should've remembered these two greats also played the same variation. Bareev gives the pawn sacrifice 7. O-O which Kasparov played in a later rapid (?) game against Kramnik, this game to be precise: Kasparov vs Kramnik, 2001

Oct-30-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: Eleven mooooooves.
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Game 7, Kramnik leads 4-3
from 2000 Classical World Chess Championship by Penguincw
Kramnik Best Style Games
by Garry Power
Round 7
from WCC Index [Kramnik-Kasparov 2000] by mangala
Round 7
from WCC Index [Kramnik-Kasparov 2000] by Hesam7
Match Kramnik!
by amadeus
Game 7
from From London to Elista (Bareev/Levitov) by Qindarka


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC