chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Robert James Fischer vs Anthony LoCoco
"Livin' la Vida Lococo" (game of the day Aug-18-2005)
Fischer Simul Exhibition Tour (1964), Chicago, IL USA, Mar-22
Italian Game: Evans Gambit. Mieses Defense (C52)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

NOTE: You are using our new chess viewer, "Olga." For more info see the Olga Quickstart Guide. You can switch back to the old viewer (pgn4web) from the pulldown menu below. If you have questions or suggestions see our Olga chessforum.

explore this opening
find similar games 1,003 more games of Fischer
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
    [help]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Aug-18-05  AgentRgent: 14. d6+ Kh8 15. dxe7 Qe8 16. exf8=Q+ Qxf8 17. Ba3 Qd8 18. Rd1 seems to be sufficient for white.
Aug-18-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  RookFile: I don't know why it is felt that
Lococo fell behind early, when
11.... Nxf7 might have won the game
for him.

Then in the game, after the incorrect 12. Qh5+ by Fischer (12. d6+ should win) 12.. N7g6 is a slight advantage for black, rather than 12... Kg8

Aug-18-05  vinohradska: Check out this score sheet from the same tournament: http://www.geocities.com/bprice1949...

I wonder what the score sheet from this game looked like? I would guess that "Robert James Fischer vs A Lococo" is dubious at best, and fictional at worst. It just doesn't seem to make sense.

Aug-18-05  briiian13: I agree with al wazir. Why didnt Fischer just play 14.d6+ ??? Not only white takes knight on the next move, but either the black queen or rook is going to be captured with check again, and then the black bishop is on a5 is gone too!!!!!!! What the heck is the matter with Fischer??? Is this a game to show that even one of the greatest grandmasters of all time can overlook a totally obvious discovery tactic that even a 1400 can forsee?
Aug-18-05  vinohradska: Keep in mind that Fisher was apparently playing ~70 people at the same time. So who knows...
Aug-18-05  MarkN: The earliest kibitzes said the notation was wrong, and I too think something is wrong, because Fischer would not have played 11 Nxf7, because 11...Nxf7 would leave him high and dry down a knight. Also, I dont think Fischer would have missed 14 d6+, even if the game is correct up to that point. I like what <geezerbloke> said, <so in summary, the sac was unsound, the defence was poor and> (that's because?)<the score is wrong. I am so happy we cleared all that up.>
Aug-18-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: I wonder up until what poit did Fischer use descriptive notation. Was he still using it in 1992?
Aug-18-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  RookFile: Bobby might have just played a bad game. He was probably playing 70 guys or something at the same time, after having just made a plane trip.
Aug-18-05  ajile: Looks like the pawn sac was worth it.

heh

lol

Aug-18-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  al wazir: <AgentRgent: At this point 15...Bxc3 is impossible, as Black cannot capture his own pawn.> Duh. Like Bobby Fischer, I am unaccustomed to algebraic notation, and freqently make mistakes using it. (He and I have nothing in common otherwise.)

BTW, the only way black can hold his losses down to two pieces after 14. d3+ is by playing 14...Nd5.

Aug-18-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  RookFile: You guys keep looking at 14. d6+
but 12. d6+ also looks good.
Aug-18-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sneaky: One word describes this game perfectly: FUBAR!!
Aug-19-05  iron maiden: What about Loco?
Aug-19-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: <al wazir: ...I am unaccustomed to algebraic notation, and freqently make mistakes using it. ...The only way black can hold his losses down to two pieces after 14. d3+...> LOL.
Aug-19-05  midknightblue: Yes, I think that a simul could certainly have some pretty unusual looking games where both the titled player and his patzer opponent could play some pretty funky moves. I would tend to think the game is real, and just full of dubious and questionable moves
Aug-20-05  sneaky pete: Of course it's not real, if it were, even at the end (moves 26/7/8) white would have missed the obvious knock out Rxe6 .. 3 moves in a row. It's just a warning sign against the obsolete descriptive notation, where one slight error may ruin the entire game.

In this case, I bet the original scoresheet has 11.KtxP .. which should have been 11.KtxRP .. but was interpreted as 11.KtxBP .. by whoever made the transcription. Note 16.Qd3 ..: if pawn f7 were missing, Nd5 would be pinned, no need to guard Qc3 from attack, a stronger move like 16.Ba3 .. is playable.

I tried to reconstuct the actual game with 11.Nxh7 .. etc, but so far failed. I'm convinced black played .. P-QB3 (.. c6) and .. P-B3 (.. f6), the last move transcribed as .. h6 here, and the white queen squatted at g3 at some point. Also: cg.com arbitrarily changed 19... Nf4 to 19... Nf6 in October 2002, whereas 19... Nf4 was actually played (20.Rae1 .. is to guard against Nf4-e2+xg3). What a mess. Poor Bobby, if he ever sees this page, he'll sue us all.

Aug-20-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  RookFile: Yeah, I thought Bobby must have played 11. Nxh7, it's a logical move, but chessgames has a later 17... h6
in this game, which obviously can't happen if Bobby has already taken the rook pawn. It's a mystery.
Aug-20-05  sneaky pete: <RookFile> My conclusion is: black never played .. h6; he played maybe .. P-R3 (..a6 or .. h6, but there would be no h-pawn anymore) or .. P-B3 (.. c6 or .. f6 depending on which bishop's pawn is still at base). A sloppily written <B> can be read as <R>.
Aug-20-05  midknightblue: <sneadkypete> interesting points about moves 24/25/26, but of course that is water under the bridge. Fischer doesnt need to play that move simply because 'everything wins' after 21...Nd5?
Aug-21-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: See if this makes more sense:

Robert James Fischer - A Lococo [C52]
Fischer Simul Exhibition Tour Chicago, 22.03.1964

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.b4 Bxb4 5.c3 Ba5 6.d4 exd4 7.0-0 Nge7 8.Ng5 d5 9.exd5 Ne5 10.Bb3 0-0 11.Nxh7 Kxh7 12.Qh5+ Kg8 13.Qxe5 dxc3 14.Nxc3 Bxc3 15.Qxc3 Nxd5 16.Qg3 c6 17.Bb2 f6 18.Bc2 Be6 19.Qg6 Qd6 20.Qh7+ Kf7 21.Bg6+ Ke7 22.Qxg7+ Kd8 23.Qxb7 Rb8 24.Qxa7 Rh8 25.g3 Rf8 26.Ba3 1-0

Feb-19-06  MorphyMatt: <RookFile>Yeah, I agree, the whole game is loco.
Feb-20-06  MorphyMatt: And Fishy
May-11-11  sneaky pete: The problem with the reconstruction <offramp> made is that after 24.Qxa7 ..


click for larger view

24... Rxb2 is overlooked by both players. I suggest that only two deviations from the score as given by Donaldson are sufficient: 11.Nxh7 Kxh7 and 17... f6. So after 10... O-O


click for larger view

11.Nxh7 Kxh7 12.Qh5+ Kg8 13.Qxe5 dxc3 14.Nxc3 Bxc3 15.Qxc3 Nxd5 16.Qd3 c6 17.Bb2 f6


click for larger view

18.Bc2 Be6 19.Qg6 Nf4 20.Qe4 Qd6 21.Bc1 Nd5 22.Qh7+ Kf7 23.Bg6+ Ke7 24.Qxg7+ Kd8 25.Qxb7 Rb8 26.Qxa7 Rh8 27.g3 Rf8 28.Ba3 .. 1-0

It is true that in this reconstruction Fischer missed a quicker win with 19.Qh7+ Kf7 20.Bg6+ Ke7 21.Ba3+ Kd7 22.Qxg7+ ..


click for larger view

but anything is better than the nonsense we have here now.

Nov-30-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheFocus: From a simul in Chicago, Illinois on March 22, 1964.

Fischer scored +56=11-4.

Mar-08-17  sneaky pete: Bobby knew what to do after 10... O-O as can be seen from Fischer vs R Carbonell, 1964 played 6 days later.

I rest my case.

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 3)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>

Now on DVD
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>
This game is type: EXHIBITION (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
3/22
from 1964 Fischer simul exhibition tour by gauer
Evans Gambit
by Inlandmoon
!! Fischer . Evans Gambit
from SUBLIME by wwm
Italian Game: Evans Gambit games
by vasileios
Evans Gambit. Mieses Def (C52) 1-0 Imperfect splatter but how!
from Diagonals Attack: Bs Highway, Battery, Crossfire by fredthebear
EVANS GAMBIT
by gambitfan
Do the Lococomotion (Annie K.) & Livin' la vida Lococo (tpstar)
from Punny Games vol. I by Memorable Quotes
fischer evans
from xfer's favorite games 2006 by fredthebear
Evans Gambit. Mieses Def (C52) 1-0 Imperfect splatter but how!
from 1960s- The Rise of Fredthebear & Fischer King by fredthebear
5...Ba5 6.d4 exd4 7.O-O Nge7 8.Ng5 d5 9.exd5 Ne5 10.Bb3
from Evans Gambit by KingG
Evans Gambit. Mieses Def (C52) 1-0 Imperfect splatter but how!
from Captain's Crunch Munched by Fredthebear by fredthebear
August 18: Livin' la Vida Lococo
from Game of the Day 2005 by Phony Benoni
woodenbishop's favorite games #3
by woodenbishop
fischer evans
from xfer's favorite games 2006 by xfer
Evans Gambit. Mieses Def (C52) 1-0 Imperfect splatter but how!
from Attacks a2/a7, b2/b7 and c2/c7 ECO C by FTB by fredthebear
Evans Gambit. Mieses Def (C52) 1-0 Imperfect splatter but how!
from Attacks & Sacs f7/f2 -1st Edition by Fredthebear by fredthebear
Evans Gambit. Mieses Def (C52) 1-0 Imperfect splatter but how!
from Game collection: -ER by fredthebear


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | advertising | contact us
Copyright 2001-2017, Chessgames Services LLC