Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Louis Paulsen vs Paul Morphy
1st American Chess Congress (1857), New York, NY USA, rd 4, Nov-05
Four Knights Game: Scotch Variation (C47)  ·  0-1


Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 27 times; par: 51 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 10 more Paulsen/Morphy games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
Premium Chessgames Member
  An Englishman: Good Evening: This is the last of the Morphy-Paulsen games to be annotated on the site, so I guess I can claim first.

Paul shows his pawn-grabbing side in this one. Ironically, Paulsen drops a pawn *because* he has a lead in development in a symmetrical position!

Apr-28-06  sneaky pete: "Zuletzt hatte ich noch gegen den unüberwindlichen Morphy zu kämpfen. Anfangs hielt ich mich sehr gut; ... aber dan wurde ich rasch besiegt und verlor vier Partien nach der Reihe. Mr Morphy ist jedenfalls ein besserer Spieler als ich jetzt bin, doch hätte ich ihm weit mehr zu thun gemacht, wenn ich nicht während der vier letzten Partien an einem starken Schnupfen gelitten hätte. Ausser den fünf Partien mit Morphy habe ich keine Partie im Turniere verloren." Paulsen in a letter to his brother, published in the Schachzeitung, 1858, dug up bij Kaissiber, issue 20, 2005. So the poor man lost the last 4 games of the match because he was suffering from a severe cold. Familiar, isn't it?
Apr-28-06  euripides: <So the poor man lost the last 4 games of the match because he was suffering from a severe cold> Yes, misrepresentation of players' interviews is indeed a familiar phenomenon. Of course Paulsen actually said that he would have given Morphy much more to do if he hadn't had a cold.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Calli: Chess excuse #18 -- Ich habe eine Schnupfen und ...

Paulsen does say Morphy is better than him, so I'll give him a break on that the excuse. unüberwindlichen Morphy -> the insurmountable Morphy

<sneaky pete> great! Thanks for posting that one! Goes into my file.

Jul-23-06  waddayaplay: For those who don't know German, I'll do a quick translation (don't expect it to be perfect, but you'll get the message).

"In the end I had to fight against the undefeatable ("insurmountable ") Morphy. In the beginning I managed rather well; ... but then I was hastily defeated and lost four games in a row. Mr Morphy is anyhow a better player than me, but I should have been able to give him more resistance, had I not suffered a severe cold in the four last games. Except the five games lost to Morphy, I did not lose any games in the tournament. "

Apr-14-07  wolfmaster: I have one word to say to Paulsen: Gezundheit!
Premium Chessgames Member
  heuristic: This is game 8 of the final round of the 1st American Chess Congress
Premium Chessgames Member
  heuristic: 22...c5 23.f4 (23.Bxd5 Rad8 24.Bxd8 Rxd8) 23...c4 24.Ba2 b4 and BLK wins the B

after 25.c3, WHT is lost (and 21.a3 was the weak move that started the decline)

but 26...c4 27.Bg5 Ra2 28.Rc1 Rea8 looks better than game

and 27...c4 28.Bb1 Re2 29.Kg1 Rb8 looks better than game

Nov-20-16  CaringLuv: 30.Bxc2 Rxc1+ 32.Bxc1 Ra1 and White's dark-squared bishop is lost.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
paul morphy best games
by brager
Four Knights Game: Scotch (C47) 0-1 P grab drops the exchange
from 4 NW 4 NE 4 SW 4 SE Good to Fredthebear by fredthebear
Final Match, Round Eight
from New York 1857 by suenteus po 147
Games won by Morphy
by CCAT coach
from Morphy Lessons by superstoned
The Four Knights
by nkvd
by lazintata
Four Knights Game: Scotch (C47) 0-1 P grab drops the exchange
from Not Duct Tape, Not Beer, Not Irish Either by fredthebear
Four Knights Game: Scotch (C47) 0-1 P grab drops the exchange
from Paul Morphy Conquered the World by Atsa
Final Match, Round Eight
from New York 1857 by JoseTigranTalFischer
Four Knights Game: Scotch (C47) 0-1 P grab drops the exchange
from Paul Morphy Conquered the World Says Fredthebear by demirchess
Match Morphy!
by amadeus
from ROOKH1's favorite games by ROOKH1
Morphy Favorites
by chocobonbon
Paul Morphy -The Great Chess Genius
by Timothy Glenn Forney
The Four Knights
by prime rib

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC