chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Vitaly Chekhover vs Iosif Rudakovsky
Moscow (1945)
Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense. Rubinstein Variation (D61)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 10 times; par: 65 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 2 more Chekhover/I Rudakovsky games
sac: 38.Rc8 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: The tournament is found above the game. For the newest chess events, this information may be a link which takes you to the tournament page which includes other games, a crosstable, discussion, etc.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Aug-05-04  Shah Mat: one of Chernev's "Most Instructive", he calls it an "unknown masterpiece"

a great lesson in strategy and the paralyzing power of an outposted knight and an overworked queen.

of course 38. Qg7+ Ke7 39. Rxe6+ Kxe6 40. Qe5# is possible, but Chernev notes, rather caustically, that Chekhover wasn't looking for it; he allready had the winning combo well-organized: "The moral is: Play the move that forces the win in the simplest way. Leave the brilliancies to Alekhine, Keres, and Tal."

ahahahahha!

Sep-24-05  Averageguy: <"The moral is: Play the move that forces the win in the simplest way. Leave the brilliancies to Alekhine, Keres, and Tal."> I always look for the best move in a position, even if I have already planned a different continuation several moves earlier.
Dec-13-05  ArturoRivera: curious that in the spanish version of the book (which i own), the name Tal is ommited in the final part...
Mar-03-07  Octavia: Chernev also said: "It takes time to analyse combinations, and the shorter way, ventured on hurriedly, may turn out to have a hole in it." "Logical chess", game 27
Mar-03-07  aazqua: Nice domination by white. The entire ending sequence was a little superfluous - the key is black's pathetic white bishop throughout the middle game.
Jun-26-07  euripides: Both Nd5 and dxc4 followed by b5 are standard ideas in the QGD. But playing them together allows White to play Ne4 and gain control of c5.

Lasker vs Capablanca, 1921 shows a more successful approach.

Jul-13-08  Amarande: Actually, the Qg7 etc. variation, while winning somewhat faster, still leads to the same type of ending. Black will have to play 39 ... Kd8 to avoid the mate, after which there is the same R for Q trade as here.

However, White will then be able to immediately snap off Black's h-pawn to finish things quickly, whereas there's still room for a bit of resistance after the game continuation - a likely continuation is 39 ... Ke7 40 Qxc8 Rd8 41 Qc7+ Kd7 42 Qe5 Rg8 (Black's last 3 moves are because he must not allow the h-pawn to fall but now White wins on the Q-side) 43 Qf6 Ke8 44 d5 exd5 (there is nothing better) 45 Qxa6 Ke7 46 Qb7+ Ke6 47 a6 and the rest is trivial.

Oct-04-08  notyetagm: <euripides: Both Nd5 and dxc4 followed by b5 are standard ideas in the QGD. But playing them together allows White to play Ne4 and gain control of c5.>

That is a *very* good point.

It is this faulty combination of QGD ideas that lands Black in trouble by allowing White to take control of the c5-square.

Jul-13-09  birthtimes: My English version 10th paperback edition of Logical Chess does not mention Tal's name either. And since Tal was not that well-known in America in 1957 when Chernev first wrote the book, I doubt if Tal's name is in it like Shah Mat said.

Chernev also said, "The move with which he [a master] wins is the one whose effects he foresaw earlier and analyzed thoroughly before starting his final combination. Once the series of forcing moves clicks, there is no reason at all for him to waste time finding other moves that might win."

Jul-13-09  ughaibu: Shah Mat isn't talking about Logical Chess, he's talking about The Most Instructive Games. . . . and that book includes at least one game of Tal's.
Jul-13-09  birthtimes: Interesting thing about that Lasker-Capablanca 1921 game...Capablanca decided to remove White's Knight on c3 before it got to e4 and c5, but if Lasker would have beaten him to the punch by playing 11. Nxd5, then a likely continuation would have been 11...exd5 12. Bd3 Nf6 13. O-O followed by the well-known minority attack conducted by White on the queenside.
Dec-06-10  YCP: Why didn't black play Rd5 at some point (moves 26, 28 or so)? It seems to make whites control of c5 not so useful....
Mar-09-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  GrahamClayton: Chekhover puts a squeeze on Black that Petrosian or Karpov would have been proud of.

14.♘e5! ensures control of the c5 outpost by removing the defender ♘d7. This control also eliminates any possibility of Black playing the freeing ...c5, thus paralysing the Bishop behind its own pawns.

19.♕e4! stops any attempt by Black to free his position with ...e5. 20...e5 21.♕g3 pins the pawn, and White has major pressure after 21...♖fe8 22.♗f3 against both e5 and c6.

Dec-22-14  Martin Riggs: Vitaly truly does justice to his name: Check & Over! [:
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
44. The Pillsbury Bind
from The Most Instructive Games of Chess Ever Played by Incremental
game 27- P180 - P3CR revisited
from Chernevīs book by ninja007
Game 27: "Logical Chess: Move by Move" by Irving Chernev
from Leearn Checkmates on the 3rd/6th Outer File by fredthebear
Queen's Gambit Declined
by KingG
Opening: Queen's Gambit Declined (1.d4) Game 27
from Logical Chess: Move By Move (Chernev) - COMPLETE by howardb86
Game 27
from Logical Chess: Move by Move (Irvin Chernev) by howardb86
The Pillsbury Bind
from Instructive Games of Chess by Chernev by Del ToRo
QGD Orthodox Def. Rubinstein Var (D61) 1-0 The Pillsbury Bind
from Chess in Hours for the Life of Fredthebear! by fredthebear
webdove's favorite games
by webdove
Game 27
from Logical Chess (Chernev) by Qindarka
Game 44
from Instructive Games (Chernev) by braystacey
44. The Pillsbury Bind
from The Most Instructive Games of Chess Ever Played by alachabre
Games 1-100
by chess2d
The Pillsbury Bind
from Instructive Games of Chess by Chernev by isfsam
Game 27
from Logical Chess (Chernev) by cappanegra
Opening: Queen's Gambit Declined (1.d4) Game 27
from Logical Chess: Move By Move (Chernev) - COMPLETE by Incremental
Game 44
from The Most Instructive Games of Chess Ever Played by edwin.n.walker
The Pillsbury Bind
from Instructive Games of Chess by Chernev by Jersey Joe


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC