Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Peter Leko vs Vladimir Kramnik
Budapest RWE Gas m (2001) (rapid), rd 10, Jan-02
Sicilian Defense: Four Knights Variation (B45)  ·  0-1


explore this opening
find similar games 112 more Leko/Kramnik games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can make these tips go away by registering a free account then visiting your preferences page. Simply check the option "Don't show random tips on game pages." and click the Update Profile button at the bottom.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Feb-13-04  Catfriend: Maybe it's a local rule where I play... Or I mixed something up
Feb-13-04  ughaibu: Square Dance: That's all fine and in fact I haven't even looked at this game and didn't know who behaved how, I just wanted to conjecture a point about attitudes. From my own experience I can say losing at chess used to effect me, not too strongly but enough to feel cold walking home, shogi never effected me like that because there isn't the same feeling of having the right to a draw. I may be wrong with "because", the other side is that as almost all games have decisive results we dont have to stretch our ethics in search of wins, they happen naturally. I dont think I'm contradicting myself regarding your previous situation(?), for me the most important thing is the games social function.
Feb-13-04  square dance: <ughaibu> i wasnt saying that you were wrong at all, i hope i didnt give that impression, but just adding to my previous post and replying to yours.
Feb-13-04  ughaibu: Thanks, I wasn't sure.
Feb-13-04  Lawrence: square dance, Geurt Gijssen in "An Arbiter's Notebook" in Chesscafé.com has explained several times about this question, and every time he does so I agree with you and think "How unfair." It's something like "If a draw is offered and refused and even with poor play one side would not lose then the arbiter shall declare a draw." In other words they are rewarding the guy who has misspent his time by giving him a draw. I like Geurt but hate his column because of all the nittpicking that goes on among chess players. You could check in the chesscafé archives.
Feb-13-04  rover: Catfriend: There is a 2 minute draw rule but it doesn't apply for Rapid play, only classical time controls.

square dance: We'll have to disagree on this. I think if a game is obviously drawn so much that the defending side has demonstrated the drawing technique then a draw should be agreed. The argument that "he should have managed his time better" does not convince me, since some positions can be dragged out almost forever, degenerating the game into a "who can move faster" competition. Which, in my mind, has little to do with chess.

Feb-13-04  square dance: <rover> then there should be a rule against it. i think there should be, but if there is not why cant a professional play for a win?
Feb-13-04  rover: Possibly, but a good rule is difficult to create.
Anyway, I'll give Kramnik the benfit of doubt. Possibly this game was played with an increment, in which case Leko just didn't know the technique well enough to deserve the draw.
Jan-07-05  themindset: i agree with rover here, speed-moving should not decide the winner.
Jan-19-05  Granite: Speed moves should certainly decide the winner in a timed game, that's why the clock exists doesn't it? Rapid chess is a "who can move faster" competition in that it's a "who can think faster" competition. If someone comes out ahead on time with an otherwise equal position I'm going to nurse the clock to beat them every time. How many games have we seen lost near time controls in matches when the game was even? Should we discount those as being unsportsman like as well because he won the game based on a blunder made in time pressure?

Moreso, it's not as though these men are playing a casual game of chess at the local pub, they're professionals who do this for a living, I'm not going to fault someone who's working his hardest over the board to make his money by whatever means are deemed fair by the governing body.

Leko knew the rules when he agreed to this game, just like Kramnik did, and I don't see anything unsporting about playing by the rules both players agreed to before the game began. Frankly if Leko offered me a draw in a position like this when I was clearly going to win on time seems far more unsporting and rude then playing for a win with the rules agreed to.

I'd also like to point out that it's VERY unfair to draw when you could win in tournement play. It's unsportsman like to manipulate player scores artificially and to play without doing your best to gather as many points as you can. Imagine if Kramnik did offer a draw and another player lost a ranking and therefore prize money because of it, I'd be furious! This game ended exactly as it should.

Truely, if you find speed moving to be an offense to what you consider good chess then don't play it, and don't support it, but it's certainly a valid form of the game and has demonstrated itself as such for many years. Personally I think violence in sport is 'unsportsmanlike' but I certainly don't fault a football player from tackling his opponent, I simply don't watch football.

Nov-02-05  Udit Narayan: So much for Kramnik's art of the short draw...
Nov-02-05  aw1988: <ughaibu: In a game like shogi in which even the strongest players usually lose at least 30%>

How does that happen?

Nov-02-05  ughaibu: I dont understand what you mean.
Nov-02-05  aw1988: It seems like an awful lot of losses for one season.
Nov-02-05  ughaibu: A top professional probably plays around 60 games a year, losing around 20 of them.
Nov-02-05  aw1988: Oh, that's more realistic.
Jan-10-06  alexandrovm: sometimes Kramnik fights until the end, good to see that once in a while...
Mar-22-07  gambitfan: I do not understand at all this final position!

Endgame Rook against Bishop is very complicate !

(Leko, Kramnik, 2001) 0-1

click for larger view

Oct-05-07  gambitfan: An interesting enfgame : ♖ // ♗

38 moves after the last pawn taking...

A difficult endgame!

Jan-23-08  whatthefat: <aw1988: Oh, that's more realistic.>


Nov-18-12  Tigranny: Sort of unfair to Leko that he lost in a clear draw and Kramnik just kept playing on.
May-21-13  Drakulo: Shouldn't the white king stay on the safe a1 corner with his bishop around? That's a fortress, which means an easy draw. I can't see why Leko had to move his king elsewhere.
May-21-13  Nerwal: <Shouldn't the white king stay on the safe a1 corner with his bishop around? That's a fortress, which means an easy draw.> This game was rapid without increment, so there's little point discussing the chess value of the last few moves... By pure instinct Leko uncornered his king, that's pretty much all there is to it...

Still there are some very rare cases where being in the right corner or close to it loses :

click for larger view

White to play wins

Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <Nerwal: This game was rapid without increment, so there's little point discussing the chess value of the last few moves.....>

Same as many other games at that speed, the value of which is thereby diminished, except for those generally looking to belittle the play of those stronger than themselves.

Premium Chessgames Member
  alexmagnus: <This game was rapid without increment, so there's little point discussing the chess value of the last few moves....>

Given the move numbers, it would be extreme zeitnot even in a classical game.

search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: RAPID (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
from Kramnik! by larrewl
tigerafta's favorite games
by tigerafta
46e_R:B, all pawns on one wing
by whiteshark
Rook v Bishop
from Endgames: pawnless by capybara
6 Ndb5 Bb4 7 a3
from DIEGOGG's SICILAN 4CABALLOS by diegoggil
KKW's 'The World's longest chess games'
by KKW
Sicilian Four Knights (B45) 0-1
from 4 NW 4 NE 4 SW 4 SE Good to Fredthebear by fredthebear
from PAWNLESS ENDGAMES by gambitfan
6 Ndb5 Bb4 7 a3

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC