chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Vladislav Vorotnikov vs Edvins Paulsovich Kengis
? (1983)
Alekhine Defense: Scandinavian Variation (B02)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 442 more games of Kengis
sac: 31.Qxd5 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Mar-05-05  samvega: 'cause we are two wiiiiild and kerrraziah guys uh-huh-huh-huh-huh
Mar-08-05  samvega: Would 22.Qf8 have won just as easily? What on earth was 27..e6 for? Why not 28.a3?

Anyway, some charming moves by both players: 21.Nb6+; going for it with 23..dc (presumably he could have chickened out with 23..Na5?); 26..Bd5.

Nov-21-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  fredthebear: <samvega> I generally agree with your comments to this active, entertaining game.

21.Nb6+ is a useful intermezzo check as White has two pieces en prise, meaning he will lose one anyway so try to get some value before being removed. Giving up the White knight w/tempo eventually leads to the Black queen surrendering herself to the White rook instead of the previous threat of queen takes rook w/check, so it had quite an impact benefitting White. (If 21...axNb6 instead, the intermezzo 22.Qxb7+ is handy for the White queen and then rescue the cornered White rook.) Looks like 21...Kc7 would have worked out better for Black.

Yes, 22.Qf8 is better. It would have avoided future congestion, which turns out OK for White as well but was much less clear at the time.

22...Bf8 and Black appears better. The simple 23.c3 is an innocent game changer that many of us would have overlooked.

23...dxc3 was too hopeful and ends up costing Black his queen. It seems 23...Kc7 was better.

26...Bd5 sure looks odd, so White scrutinized it's intentions. Black's offer is an attempt to deflect the White bishop from the diagonal to allow Black's c-pawn to promote.

27...e6 does have a slight defensive purpose but is overly cautious. 27...Nb4 was better. Time is of the essence in this position.

Yes 28.a3 seems best. My guess is White simply did not anticipate the Black knight's advance. But the a2 and c3 pawns remain in place for the remainder of the game so it works out to White's satisfaction.

This is one of those kinds of middle games where matters are not quite as seriously threatening as they first seem. Black's responses just don't have enough time and force to fully materialize. White is rewarded for continually increasing the mobility of his pieces to penetrate, removing both Black rooks, and trying to bust the White queen out of jail. Black is simply on the defensive too long in maintaining the restriction.

Then the White queen must kamikaze out of the corner to her death and the endgame has suddenly arisen with White finding itself having the advantage after careful defensive measures. White recoils using a blockade and simplification as the best defense against promotion w/an otherwise won position on the opposite wing.

The opposite colored bishops ending is usually drawish, but White's connected passers on the kingside would dictate the finish. Had the ending played out, White can sacrifice his remaining bishop if necessary (the blockading Bd2 has no worries at the moment) to stop the last of the separated, isolated Black pawns on the queenside. Whereas a preventive sacrifice by the Black bishop only helps the advance of the remaining White pawn as it recaptures on the kingside. Black's monarch won't have enough time to get to hot spots on each side of the board. The OCB ending is better for White this time.

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Alekhine Defense: Scandinavian Var (B02) 1-0 Both Qs kamikaze
from EG Minors Excavating the Elements by fredthebear
Alekhine Defense: Scandinavian Var (B02) 1-0 Both Qs kamikaze
from Battleship 1e4 Fredthebear at War! by fredthebear
Crazy queen trap
from Classic Games by IMErikKislik
trapped or restricted pieces
by obrit
Bruce Graham's favorite games 2
by Bruce Graham


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC