Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

There is a clue unsolved right now on the Holiday Contest Clues Page!   [Official Contest Rules]
Please see this announcement for some updates.
(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Gyula Breyer vs Johannes Esser
"Esser's Mess" (game of the day Sep-07-2018)
Budapest (1917), Budapest AUH, Jul-??
Slav Defense: General (D10)  ·  1-0


Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 12 times; par: 61 [what's this?]

Annotations by Richard Reti.      [2 more games annotated by Reti]

explore this opening
find similar games 1 more Breyer/J Esser game
sac: 12.e5 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To flip the board (so black is on the bottom) press the "I" key on your keyboard.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 6 OF 6 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: <posod> Had Breyer played the immediate <14.Qg4> and the game continued as it did, this position would have resulted after <14...Kg7 15.Rh7+ Kxh7 16.Qh5+ Kg8 17.Bxg6 fxg6 18.Qxg6+ Kh8 19.Qh6+ Kg8 20.g6>

click for larger view

And Black could defend by 20...Bh4+ and 21...Qe7. The idea of 14.Kf1 was to avoid this check down the road, and it's the depth of that idea which has impressed so many since.

Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: This play seemed to have three parts: First, white developed his piece, while black didn't; second, white attacked on the king side while black's queenside pieces; finally, white chopped up the queenside and ended with a winning endgame. Funny, if it weren't so sad.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: The ...Bh4+ clearance move that could have come up in the game is a familiar theme, yet one easily missed. I can recall an incident where Fischer either missed it in analysis or pointed out that somebody else missed it, but the exact details escape me. Surely somebody can fill us in.

In the meantime, a trivial example from my own praxis:

click for larger view

Moody - Weber, Kalamazoo, 1979. Simply 1.Qh6+ recovers the rook with a better game, but I couldn't see how Black could survive after <1.e5>. The answer, of course, was <1...Bh3!>.

There is a similar kind of idea in the From Gambit. After <1.f4 e5 2.fxe5 d6 3.exd6 Bxd6 4.Nf3 g5 5.d4 g4 6.Ng5 f5 7.e4 h6 8.e5 Be7 9 Nh3 gxh3 10.Qh5+ Kf8 11.Bc4 Rh7 12.Qg6>

click for larger view

Black's key defensive idea is <12...Bb4+! 13.c3 Rg7 14.Bxh6 Qh4+!> and 15...Qxh6.

Jul-08-16  posoo: thank you benones
Jul-08-16  parisattack: <RookFile: I realize that computers are showing lots of improvements for both sides in this game....>

Yes, indeed. Using an engine it almost looks like a blunder-fest. "Beautiful theory, ugly fact stuff." But it is a remarkable game and the concepts from Breyer are amazing. I first saw the game in Cole's Dynamic Chess and it made quite an impression on me.

This one of Breyer's is also awesome - Euwe vs Breyer, 1921

Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: The only games which aren't "chock full of inaccuracies" are those which are so boring that we haven't bothered examining them to find the inaccuracies.
Premium Chessgames Member
  morfishine: <Phony Benoni: The only games which aren't "chock full of inaccuracies" are those which are so boring that we haven't bothered examining them to find the inaccuracies> I think this statement is inaccurate due to your use of the word 'only'



Premium Chessgames Member
  Sneaky: Let the perfectionist play postal. — Yasser Seirawan
Premium Chessgames Member
  ajile: <Bartacus: 8...c5 has been given as the best move, leading to equal play.>

Completely logical since White has transposed into a Stonewall structure with 6.f4. Note that moving the Black c pawn twice is not that big of a concern since White has closed the center.

The normal way to attack either the Black or White side of a Stonewall is to advance the c pawn to the 4th rank. The attack on the opponents d pawn creates useful counterplay and if cxd is allowed the dissolving of the center usually reveals weaknesses in the Stonewall setup.

I like 6.f4 though since now Black must find the strategic way out which is moving his c pawn twice.

Feb-17-18  Retireborn: I seem to recall that a source for this game other than Reti's book was found; does anybody know anything about the game, tournament, month, round no etc?
Premium Chessgames Member
  MissScarlett: I didn't know this was in a Reti book, but Edochess has Breyer and Esser meeting in both a tournament and a short match in 1917:

It seems Esser was living in Budapest for some time during the war, but I don't if that was by accident or design.

Feb-17-18  Retireborn: Many thanks again, <MissS>. I believe this game is from the match, but would like to know more. I assumed Reti's annotations were from one of his books, but I'm probably wrong about that.

Perhaps I'll splash out on Jimmy Adams' book.

Premium Chessgames Member
  MissScarlett: Are you aware the GM Istvan Bilek had an article, <Breyer's Brilliancy>, in the August 1987 <BCM>? Nothing in particular is said about the circumstances of the game, but there's an editorial footnote: <Ken Whyld has checked contemporary German sources and established that 18.Qh5+ Kg8 18.Bxg6 was the actual move order. Hence Reti seems the source of the error when transcribing the game.>

So apparently there's an issue, at least, between the German and English versions of Reti's book (I'm not well versed in the classics), but for our purposes, the game was published in contemporary sources. The only problem is finding some non-idle German-speaker to track one down for you. Good luck with that!

Feb-17-18  Telemus: <Retireborn: I believe this game is from the match> Why? In fact, it comes from a tournament. And it was published in several chess magazines in those days. Here you find it reprinted from "Deutsches Wochenschach": (incomplete game-score).

The game J Esser vs Breyer, 1916 can be found here: (1916 seems to be wrong).

Feb-17-18  Retireborn: <MissS> Thanks again. No, never seen Bilek's article, my source for the game was some fireside anthology book, edited by Edwards(?) as I recall. I did later see a more complete and correct version of the game, which I associate with Hans Ree, although my memory has not retained any details.

<Telemus> Many thanks to you too. I think my original source must have referred to it as part of the match. So if I understand your link correctly it's from the 5-payer Budapest tournament held in July 1917? That's already most of what I wanted to know.

Premium Chessgames Member
  MissScarlett: Reti's text is online:

Interesting that already by August 1918 (<Deutsches Wochenschach>) this game is being presented as a truncated masterpiece.

Feb-18-18  Telemus: <Retireborn: So if I understand your link correctly it's from the 5-payer Budapest tournament held in July 1917?> Yes, both games are from this event.
Feb-25-18  Telemus: Chapter 17 "An immortal game" of Jimmy Adams' book on Breyer deals with this game on 20 pages. First, the game is presented with the combined comments of Reti (from Modern Ideas in Chess), Földeak (Magyar Sakkélet), Coles (Dynamic Chess) and Breyer (Bécsi Magyar Ujság).

Then it follows an analysis by Ervin Haág (Magyar Sakkélet). Next is an article of Mark Dvoretsky (64), and finally there is an article by István Bilek (Magyar Sakktörténet).

Feb-25-18  Retireborn: <Telemus> Thanks for that. Do any of these writers mention the round number of the game, by any chance?
Feb-26-18  Telemus: <Retireborn> Chapter 16 "Creative competition in Budapest" presents Breyer's other games from the tournament. It begins with the following sentence:

"A further small double round tournament in Budapest, starting on 29 May 1917 but with games being played rather randomly over the summer, ended: [...]"

Then 6 games are presented, 5 with exact dates, no round numbers (Breyer won his first game against Barács by default). The games are presented in this order: Sterk(W), Barácz (W), Havasi(B), Havasi(W), Esser (W) and Sterk(B). Probably not enough to compute round numbers.

This game is dated July 1917 in chapter 17.

Feb-26-18  Retireborn: <Telemus> Many thanks! I won't worry about round numbers then.
Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: Caught in a breyer patch!
Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: Ah, the days romantic gambit chess. Back in the days when a Paul Morphy could take on all comers, then later draw a warm bath and put on some silk nylons.
Premium Chessgames Member
  cormier: <<<<<<Stockfish 8 (minimum 30s/ply)> 5... Bd6?> 5...dxc4 6.Bxc4 b5 7.Bd3 Bb7 8.Ne4 Nbd7 9.Nxf6+ = 0.00 (28 ply)> 6. f4?> 6.Nf3 Nbd7 7.e4 dxe4 8.Nxe4 Nxe4 9.Bxe4 Nf6 10.Bc2 + / = +0.78 (19 ply)> 6... O-O = -0.40 (32 ply) after 6...c5 7.Nf3 O-O 8.O-O dxc4 9.Bxc4 a6 10.e4 cxd4>
Premium Chessgames Member

click for larger view

Analysis by Houdini 4
6...c5 7.dxc5 Bxc5 8.Nf3 dxc4 9.Bxc4 Qxd1+ 10.Nxd1 0-0 11.Nf2 Nc6 12.Bd2 b6 13.a3 a5 14.Nd3 Be7 15.0-0 Rd8 16.Rac1 Bb7 17.Rfd1 Ne4 18.Bb5 Rac8 19.Nf2 Na7 20.Rxc8 Rxc8 = (-0.06) Depth: 24 dpa

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 6)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 6 OF 6 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
July 8: Quieting the Nay-Breyers
from Game of the Day 2016 by Phony Benoni
Dynamic Chess by R.N. Coles (Notes by Richard Reti)
from yPublished Game by Year & Unconfirmed Source II by fredthebear
sapientdust's favorite games
by sapientdust
Dynamic Chess by R.N. Coles (Notes by Richard Reti)
from QThee Queen is Meaner Volume Three!?! by fredthebear
ppeti84's favorite games
by ppeti84
Attacking Themes
by KingG
Game 75
from Guinness Book - Chess Grandmasters (Hartston) by maple227
In aggressive mood today are we ?
from fiercebadger's favorite games by fiercebadger
Goldenapple's favorite games
by Goldenapple
good idea
by hartkoka
breaking the pawn chain
from benjobench's favorite games by benjobench
reti annotation
by zakir
Favorite Games
by swr
by sigi
FP's Yearly Best Games (pre 1950)
by FairyPromotion

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC