chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

A Winding vs Soren Anton Sorensen
"Winding Down" (game of the day Sep-05-2018)
corr (1874) (correspondence), ?
Latvian Gambit: Fraser Defense (C40)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 7 more games of S Sorensen
sac: 6...Rg8 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Jan-14-04  d4Nf6Bg5: 16. cxd4 seems to be better, or aleast more consistent.
Jan-14-04  TheTurk: this game is just full of tragic mistakes. 16. cxd4 is far better, fritz even gives 16. cxd4 Bxg4 17. hxg4 Rxg4 5.81
or 16. Qxg5 Qxg5 17 cxd4 Bxg4+ hxg4 Qxg4 = 0.01

would you rather play out a game with 2 rooks and a queen + 2 minor pieces vs 2 rooks and a queen with a small bit of develpment or 2 rooks and 2 minor pieces vs a rook and a queen with no development!?

Jan-14-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sneaky: I don't understand the last move. What's the rook going to do from g5? Wouldn't Rc8 (intending Rxc3) be more to the point?
Jan-14-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: I'm also confused:I see that ♖g5 is going nowhere,but white finds this time to surrender But,then again,many crises are resolved in an oddly timed manner.

White probably saw that even with an inferior move by his opponent,that his game was going nowhere,so he gave up the ghost.

Jan-14-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  tamar: Sneaky, it's mate on h1 when black makes it to the h file.
Jan-14-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: Tamar:good point,but isn't it far easier just to proceed to c8.White only has a few spite checks along the g file
Jan-14-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  tamar: Kevin86: Rc8 easier, I dunno, white can still throw the sofa in front of the door with Bc5, then use his spite checks and then let his clock expire!
Jan-14-04  somethingstrong: The worst part of this horrific game is the fact that it was correspondence! Even average players are infinitely better when they can play out variations at their leisure.
Jan-14-04  Phoenix: Bear in mind, too, that this was played in 1874.
Jan-18-04  d4Nf6Bg5: Correspondence eh? I guess the mailman tampered with the letters! (aleast that explains the poor moves)
May-31-07  jellyace: The Rook maneouver from d8 to g8 to g5 to h5 to h1 is still the most precise way to win.

A win with ... Rc8 is also possible, but an immediate ...Rxc3 fails: 25. ... Rc8 26. Kf1 Rxc3 27. Bxc3 Qe2+ (or 27. ...Qh3+ 28. Ke1 Qf3 29. Kf1!) 28. Kg2 saves the King, plus the d and f-pawns are defended, making it hard for the pawn chain to break through; at best Black can settle for draw by perpetual moves. Instead, 26. ... Rc4! 27. Bg7 (or Be3 or Be5 or Bh8) d4! 28. Bxd4 Rxd4 should win. The point is, he must eliminate the QB before the Rxc3 sac.

Sep-05-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: White had a famous font named after him.
Sep-05-18  erimiro1: Long and winding rook
Sep-05-18  goodevans: Is it too much to ask that those submitting GOTD puns, however hilarious, do a bit of quality control on the game itself?
Sep-05-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  fredthebear: 8.Kd1 sure doesn't look right. Imperfections (I won't say blunder but I'm thinking it is) can make a game of chess (or a significant other for that matter) very interesting.
Sep-05-18  Pballa: Weird game, several inaccuracies. White's 16th move makes no sense (16. cxd4 is clearly winning), however Black's 15th move also makes no sense.

Perhaps black meant to play 15. ..Rxg4 (which is logical) and made the wrong notation in correspondence? In turn, White realized the error and gave him a break by playing the inferior 16. Qxg5? I'm only speculating, as these 2 moves make no sense at all.

Sep-05-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  AylerKupp: <offramp> I'm sure that the look of the Windings font was greatly influenced by Winding's play in this game.
Sep-05-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  sfm: <Pballa: ...>
I got to the same conclusion. Black must have written R-KN4. Or rather, the game has too may senseless moves to be trusted as ever played as given. Without anything of value or interest, it is an odd choice of GOTD, but the lighter side is as always: it can only get better.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CORRESPONDENCE. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Latvian gambit victories
by brucemubayiwa
September 5: Winding Down
from Game of the Day 2018 by Phony Benoni
Latvian Gambit: Fraser Def (C40) 0-1 Anything but ordinary
from Greco's CG by fredthebear
Latvian gambit victories
by InspiredByMorphy
Latvian Gambit: Fraser Def (C40) 0-1 Anything but ordinary
from 1870s - 1890s Classic Chess Principles Arise by fredthebear
Fraser Defense 3.Ne5 Nc6 4.Qh5
from C40 Latvian Gambit IV by listen50s


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC