chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
James McConnell vs Wilhelm Steinitz
New Orleans (1886), New Orleans, LA USA
French Defense: Steinitz Attack (C00)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Annotations by Wilhelm Steinitz.      [129 more games annotated by Steinitz]

explore this opening
find similar games 3 more J McConnell/Steinitz games
sac: 9.Kd2 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Premium members can suggest a game for Guess-the-Move with the Guess-the-Move Suggestion Queue.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jan-16-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: Great analysis by the loser! I think that WS was probably the third best player in the nineteenth century-behind Em Lasker and Paul Morphy.
Jan-16-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  Calli: <kevin86> Somebody publish a book or CD on "The Collected Annotations of Steinitz". He also had alot of opinions on chess in general that would make interesting reading.
Jan-16-04  pikoro: Are you sure Steinitz was the loser in this game?
I'm afraid this is another database error.
Jan-17-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sneaky: Pikoro, if you read Calli's link, and the notes to the game, it's pretty clear that Steinitz lost this one.
Nov-22-04  TheGreatNN: Yes, Steinitz lost, but the analysis was McConnell's, not his.
Feb-22-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  aw1988: Lovely analysis for chessgames standard!
Dec-15-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  who: What happens if 6...fxe6
Dec-16-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  sneaky pete: <who> 6... fxe5 7.Qh5+ .. looks good for white.
Feb-04-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  An Englishman: Good Afternoon: 18...Rb8 prepares 19...Bb7 but expends a tempo. Would the countersacrifice 18...Bb7 offer any hope of prolonging the game?
Feb-04-07  IMDONE4: didnt Steinitz play a game almost exactly like this, but with the white pieces, against Winawer and lost?
Feb-05-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: <IMDONE4: didnt Steinitz play a game almost exactly like this, but with the white pieces, against Winawer and lost?> Yes. In fact McConnell had found an improvement for white precisely in that game (14.exf6 instead of Steinitz's 14.Ne2) and challenged Steinitz to play a game from the position after move 13 of black.
Apr-19-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: <I have never in my life played the French Defence, which is the dullest of all openings.>

-- Steinitz

As the case now stands, not true.

Apr-09-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  chancho: <AnalyzeThis> This guy lost to Morphy a bunch of times, and here he defeats Steinitz. (he also defeated Lasker in a simul game)
Aug-08-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  MrMelad: Incredibly deep and profound analysis by McConnell and very brave and informative feedback from Stienitz.

Rybka gives the position after 13..Ne7 -1.13 after 5 minutes of thought and doesn't even consider white's Bh6+ because it thinks after the forced queen exchange black is at least -1.00 ahead.

But wait, suddenly after the exchange of queens


click for larger view

18.g4! Rybka takes few seconds to discover that white indeed has the advantage, and after long thought offers the computer looking line 18..Bb7! 19.Nxb7 Rb8 20.Nd6 Rb6 21.Nc4 Rc4 +0.36

But no, wait it changes it mind again, as white has the resource 19.Rh2!


click for larger view

Now the only move to survive is 19..Nc8!! and 1.11 advantage to white with Nxb7 following.

OK then, so now Rybka wants to play 16..Bb7 in that position


click for larger view

But slowly discovers it fails with the pretty

16..Bb7 17.Rh3 Bc6 18.Rg3+ Ng6 19.h5 0.83

Fantastic! Even Rybka takes a very long time to correctly evaluate the position, eventually agreeing with Stienitz about his annotations meaning that Stienitz should not feel foolish for missing that brilliant line, 125 years after the game was played the computer makes the same error!

Apr-21-12  napoleon123: a nice game. maybe mcconnell was a better analyst than a player.
Apr-22-12  napoleon123: fritz 11 gives 18 Bb7 !! as the best move. This is still whites advantage.
Apr-03-13  TheTamale: The comment made by <TheGreatNN> in 2004 is clearly correct, as shown from the content of the notes themselves. Perhaps <Chessgames.com> could correct this minor flaw...?
May-17-14  psmith: <TheTamale> It does not seem the notes could be by McConnell. At one point the annotator says "this variation was pointed out to me by McConnell"!
Jun-26-14  ljfyffe: Mr.Philips' discovered letter from Steinitz to McConnell appears in Landsberger's The Steinitz Papers, p.48.
Jun-27-14  ljfyffe: Annotation and analysis are not necessarily the same. The first comments are given from a third party researcher's point-of-view (Phillips?). The analysis after move 14 would appear to be Steinitz's alone, with a contribution from McConnell, but the analysis would have had to be done after 1888 as Zukertort is referred to as deceased. Indeed, it is not clear where recent and contemporary comments overlap, but there is really nothing that contradicts Phillips'
statement that Steinitz did the analysis.
Jun-27-14  ljfyffe: Or, at least, after June, 1888.
Sep-12-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  ToTheDeath: A great attack. Steinitz's annotations are a real treat. I especially liked this tidbit:

<20...Bd5 might have prolonged the fight a little but the game could not be saved. White would then equally play 21.Rf7 followed by Ng5 and then with a series of checks his rook would reach c7 in which situation the battle would be decided by Nc8 preventing ...Rxc8 as well as to reach e8 with the rook after a series of checks.>

Clear as cake!

Jan-10-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  morfishine: Steinitz quote: "I have never in my life played the French Defence, which is the dullest of all openings."

I'm assuming he made this quote before he played this game

*****

Mar-22-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: <morfishine: Steinitz quote: "I have never in my life played the French Defence, which is the dullest of all openings."

I'm assuming he made this quote before he played this game>

The game started from the position after move 13 of black, and the opening was not Steinitz's choice.

Mar-22-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheFocus: Steinitz did however play the French in odds games.
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
Games to analyse
by Jaredfchess
French Defense: 2.e5 Steinitz Attack (C00) 1-0Notes by Steinitz
from Annotations by Various Authorities & Fredthebear by fredthebear
notes by Wilhelm Steinitz
from French defence, Steiner variation games by vasileios
97xd_French Disasters -Teh Dark Side of Chess
by whiteshark
French Defense: 2.e5 Steinitz Attack (C00) 1-0Notes by Steinitz
from f6 II by fredthebear
RNB w/mill (#6)
from 668 windmill (discovered checks) by whiteshark
see-saw
from chess strategems iv - under construction by gauer
See Saw Check
from Brutal Attacking Chess by JoseTigranTalFischer
bbkenya's look at later
by bbkenya
Games to analyse
by SwitchingQuylthulg
micsee's favorite games
by micsee
STEINITZ
from Annotated Games by Morphischer
World champions play the French
by ughaibu


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2018, Chessgames Services LLC