chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Peter Leepin vs Paul Mross
Munich (1941), Munich GER, rd 5, Sep-11
English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense. Queen's Knight Variation (A16)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 31 more games of P Leepin
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You should register a free account to activate some of Chessgames.com's coolest and most powerful features.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
May-24-10  Cardinal Fang: No kibitzing for this yet? The combination starting 15. ...Nxe3 is very nice.
Mar-16-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  sachistu: This game won 2nd Brilliancy Prize.

In Ceskoslovensky Sach, 1941, p58, White's 15th move is given clearly as Re1. However, in the de Gruyter tournament book (Europa-Schachturnier München 1941) the move given on page 50 is Rc1. Just below is a parenthetical comment (Siehe Bild im Rundenbericht)which I believe translates roughly to "see image (picture)in round report". On p45, the Rook is pictured on c1 so Cesk. Sach version is apparently incorrect. They suggest 15.Nxd5 ed 16.Re1 as better.

Mar-17-15  zanzibar: Pretty rare to have photographic evidence in hand.

Edward Winter has a section on the tournament, including some photographs worth seeing - some from ES M 1941, here:

http://www.chesshistory.com/winter/... (CN 3917)

Mar-17-15  zanzibar: A photo of the tournament with both Leepin and Mross in it (not playing this game):

http://de.chessbase.com/portals/3/f...

Mar-17-15  zanzibar: By the way, chessbites gives it as 15.Rc1:

http://www.chessbites.com/Games.asp...

Mar-17-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  sachistu: Thanks for the photo references <zanzibar>. I mentioned the variance because at least one of the notes in Cesk. Sach would not be possible if the Rook was on c1. Moreover, Re1 seems to make more sense given the weakness on e3. It's not uncommon for a diagram to have a misprint, but all other things being equal, I'd be inclined to believe the tournament book. It looks like the sacrifice works against either move.
Mar-18-15  zanzibar: <sachistu> I would think the tournament should be more reliable, but one can never be entirely sure.

I had thought there was an actual photograph of the position, but that was my assumption. I now understand it to be a diagram, which just puts the two scores at odds with each other.

As you said the sacrifice works against both. It might be interesting to do a full-blown analysis with both.

I'd be inclined to think 15.Rc1, only because the c-file is more likely to get opened (yes, a rather simple minded reason).

It's funny that the fatal weakness is on c5. Very hard to see at move 15.

Mar-18-15  zanzibar: Alekhine has a few comments about these players:

<Of the four youthful players (youthful in terms of both years and international experience), the Croat Rabar appears very interesting. His main defect may be insufficient knowledge of the openings, but that is something he can easily remedy.

The representative of the General Government of Poland, Mross, played in original and bold style. His beautiful game against Leepin is characteristic of this.

Considerable skill was also shown by the other participants, down to young Leepin, the least experienced player, who “nearly” defeated Richter.

The results of the tournament showed clearly that there was no player lacking in true merit.>

http://www.chesshistory.com/winter/...

Mar-19-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  sachistu: <zanzibar> I was trying to give the literal translation for 'bild' e.g. image or picture, and later I used the word 'pictured' when I was referring to the diagram. Sorry about any confusion.

In my opinion, the weakness on e3 (backward and defended only by the King) far outweighs any chance White might get on the c-file. If the move was Rc1, that suggests White did not see the sac coming. And if it was Re1, it was already too late to stop.

The limited analysis I've done indicates neither move would have made any difference. Also, it seems the continuations 'play' regardless of which move Rc1 or Re1 was played, so we are still left wondering which score is correct.

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC