|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·
Later Kibitzing > |
| Oct-20-05 |
| thathwamasi: first.....what a brilliant finish.... |
 |
| Oct-20-05 |
| joeaverage: A double queen sac!!! You don't see that very often. |
|
| Oct-20-05 |
| Counterpoint: What a pretty finish. |
|
| Oct-20-05 |
| n30: WOW! that would have made an awesome puzzle!
|
|
| Oct-20-05 |
| n30: would 41: Qc4 have saved the day? |
|
| Oct-20-05 |
| n30: erhh OK, nope :) the black pawns are playing *that* way.... |
|
| Oct-20-05 |
| rya: woooo GG |
|
Oct-20-05
 |
| khense: 42...Rf6# And the mome rath outgrabe! |
|
| Oct-20-05 |
| BadTemper: In how many games have OPPOSITE queens been put purposely en prise in successive moves such as in this game? |
|
| Oct-20-05 |
| nsteinme: Can someone explain why not 25. Qxd7? I don't see the danger - the rook just looks hung to me. Thanks. |
|
| Oct-20-05 |
| szgy: <nsteinme> I think the following line can be played: 26. Rd8 ... 27. Nc3 forking the rocks. |
|
| Oct-20-05 |
| Averageguy: <nsteinme><szgy>After 25.Qxd7 Rd8 26.Qxd8+ Bxd8 27.exd5 and white has a small material advantage in two rooks for the queen. |
|
| Oct-20-05 |
| bachiller: You can enjoy another double queen sac at Charousek vs J Wollner, 1893 |
|
| Oct-20-05 |
| EmperorAtahualpa: Very nice game of the day! I liked 25...f5!
Would 26.Qf4 be an improvement for White?
I also didn't like 20.Bxd7. Why not 20.e4? |
|
| Oct-20-05 |
| underrated: <Averageguy> yeah but in your line why not 26. Qg4 or some other safe spot? |
|
Oct-20-05
 |
| kevin86: A very rare two queen sac decides this one! Lke the game mentioned above,the queening square is twice covered,but the queens are taken and mate immediately follows. |
|
| Oct-20-05 |
| Averageguy: <underrated> Because, like <szgy> said, black would play Nc3 and after the skirish material would be even. |
|
Oct-20-05
 |
| drmariogodrob: <Averageguy><underrated> Not only would material be even, but after Nxb1 Rxb1 the backward d-pawn is gone, followed closely by the c and e varieties. |
|
| Oct-20-05 |
| Averageguy: Okay, I think we've established that taking the rook then moving the queen isn't good! But what does anyone think of my line, 25.Qxd7 Rd8 26.Qxd8+ Bxd8 with a small material advantage? |
|
Oct-20-05
 |
| OhioChessFan: <Averageguy>, that line looks good. The White Queen dies on g4 with the f5 pawn keeping her out of the action. Giving the Queen up for 2 active Rooks looks like a good idea. |
|
| Oct-20-05 |
| Averageguy: Also, it gives white a material advantage. |
|
Oct-20-05
|
| khense: <khense> 42...Rf6+ And the mome rath outgrabe! I'd better add that's a line from Jabberwocky. Otherwise it's straight jacket time. |
|
| Oct-20-05 |
| schnarre: Nice! |
|
Oct-20-05
 |
| YouRang: A wild finish. Obviously, Evans saw it from far off, while Rath didn't see it until it bit him on the nose! |
|
| Oct-21-05 |
| schnarre: Apparently! |
|
|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·
Later Kibitzing > |
sac: 41...Qxc1