chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Bent Larsen vs Aleksandar Matanovic
"Great Dane" (game of the day Sep-14-2010)
Zagreb (1965), Zagreb YUG, rd 6, Apr-??
Catalan Opening: Closed Variation (E07)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 25 times; par: 54 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 9 more Larsen/A Matanovic games
sac: 31.Nxe6 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To see the raw PGN for this game, click on the PGN: view link above.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 4 OF 4 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Apr-20-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: I tried the Monday move (Qh6) on Friday...the Friday move is Nh6+!
Apr-20-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Morten: My real troubles of the week (chessgames.com-wise) begin on Friday at the latest, but not this week. I have played over this game many times before as it appears in Larsen's fine book of his 50 selected games. The elegant double knight advance to e6 and h6 stands out.
Apr-20-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  gofer: <sevenseaman:> Many thanks for the <Crafty EGT> link for yesterday's puzzle. I now feel that I wasn't quite so "wrong" Rxb6 is very playable!
Apr-20-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  DarthStapler: I picked Qh6 instead
Apr-20-12  benjaminpugh: This wasn't a Friday puzzle. I saw the move and all the variations almost immediately, and I'm a patzer. The knight check was a pretty obvious candidate with white's other knight blocking the f8 escape square.

Moving black's king to h8 loses immediately to Bxg7. Capturing the knight loses two moves later after Qxh6 (not counting the spite check with black's rook).

Without white's bishop also covering g7, along with the en prise knight, the whole thing falls apart. Maybe some people will miss the bishop as it's way off in the other corner. That's the only way I can think this puzzle was "difficult."

Apr-20-12  LoveThatJoker: Very cool! A Larsen puzzle!

<32. Nh6+ gxh6>

(32...Kh8 33. Bxg7#)

<33. Qxh6> 1-0 as Black has no satisfactory way of defending himself from mate:

A) 33...fxe6/...f6 34. Qg7#

B) 33...Bf8 34. Qg5+ and 35. Qxg7#

C) 33...Bf6 34. Bxf6 and mate is unavoidable.

D) 33...Rc2+ 34. Kh3 Rxh2+ (34...Rxb2 35. Qg7#) 35. Kxh2 and mate cannot be stopped.

LTJ

Apr-20-12  LoveThatJoker: <sevenseaman> After 32. Nh6 gxh6 33. Qxh6 Rc2+ 34. Kh3 from your original post,

<i)b. 34...Rxb2 or fxe6 35. Qg7 or even Qg5#>

Only 35. Qg7# should be played! Not 35. Qg5+?? Bxg5 0-1

<ii) 32. Kh8 33. Nxf7#>

33. Nxf7+ is not mate and is inferior to 33. Bxg7#

I apologize if this note seems insensitive, but you need to take care when commiting the ideas that have have welled forth from you into the written format.

LTJ

Apr-20-12  sevenseaman: <gofer> <Rxb6 is very playable!> Yes it is good move. There are more than one way of winning this game.
Apr-20-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Gilmoy: Jogged my memory; I soon dredged up my earlier solution (from its GotD appearance just 1.5 years ago).

The <double-double> appears only in analysis, as the hidden sting behind <31.Nxe6>.

Apr-20-12  sevenseaman: <LoveThatJoker>I am delighted that you read my post with meticulous attention to detail. 33. Nf7# is a definite oversight and even I feel surprised it slipped through my fingers.

You are quite right <35. Qg5> is erroneous in this context and it did not belong here. It should have been 35. Qe7# alone.

Now that we are at it I will show you how it crept in.

I was thinking of the following line; (I didn't even write it as it looked outright extravagant and inane)

32. Nh6+ gxh6 33. Qxh6 Bf6 34. Bxf6 Rc2+ 35. Kh3 Rxh2+ 36. Kxh2.

now when I was at this node of thought I said to myself 'both 36...Nxf6 and 36...fxe6 are useless as the White Q mates from g7 with the help of either minor that survives. I suppose Black may just as well make a silly looking move like 37.. a6, Qxb3, Nc6 or Nc5 and White would mate from 37. Qg7# or even Qg5#'.

And that last move 37. Qg5# was a bit of residual memory that I inserted in the wrong place. (Here even 37. Qg5# works).

Yes I need to be more alert. Thanks.

Apr-20-12  bwarnock: <<King Death> Nice of you to come in. 1. Qf6 is by far the best move and we too did not see a forced 4-mate. The book solution is <1.Rf8+ Rxf8 2.Bc4+ Kg7 3.e8=N+ Rxe8 4.Qf7#>

The solution is refuted by 1...Qxf8 to which we could find no answer(for a 4-mate).>

Yes, you're (both) right - there's no mate in 4 after 1. Rf8+ Qxf8 (!). A fairly typical piece of carelessness on Reinfeld's part.

<>

Apr-20-12  BlackSheep: I guess I'm not alone in thinking this is too easy for a Friday its another one of those "one move blows the situation to bits" situations rather than a neat combo which needs a few side variations checked to see if it all works .
Apr-20-12  dumbgai: I think this was way too easy for a Friday. I mean, I found 32. Nh6+ immediately and there are too many mate threats for black to avoid after 32...gxh6 32. Qh6. There is also no tricky sequence of checks to avoid; after 32...Rc2+ 33. Kh3 black is toast.
Apr-20-12  cyclon: Is the diagram position correct or what? Because I see the answer being surprisingly easy THIS time; 32. Nh6+ gxh6 ( -Kh8 33. Bxg7X ) 33. Qxh6 and mate cannot be prevented whatever Black plays, for example 33. -Bf8 34. Qg5+/33. -Rc2+ 34. Kh3/ 33. -Bf6 34. Bxf6 and all these plus whatsoever mates.
Apr-20-12  bwarnock: <sevenseaman ... Please also examine my solution to Korchnoi vs Yusupov, 1981 and see if it is sound. (It is different, to be sure).>

Your suggested move is playable and keeps an advantage (and a likely win - only after a fairly difficult endgame though). The game continuation is better - see analysis....

Korchnoi vs Yusupov, 1981

Apr-20-12  sevenseaman: Thanks <bwarnock> for both the analyses and I concur with your views about the two clarifications requested by me.
Apr-20-12  fischer2009: I missed it.Qh6 is the move i saw and it seemed like winning.Didnt bother checking further.
Apr-20-12  LoveThatJoker: <sevenseaman> Thanks for acknowldging my note, man!

LTJ

Apr-21-12  M.Hassan: <WinKing & FSR>:
Thanks
33.Nh6# such a simple move and I did not see it. I should have pondered more to ask clarification from <WinKing>
Apr-21-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <M.Hassan> No biggie. We all have bouts of blindness sometimes. :-)
Apr-21-12  BlackSheep: With game of the day being called "Great Dane" I thought Gus Hansen had taken up chess for a min .
Jan-09-13  Eduardo Bermudez: Larsen at his prime !!
Apr-21-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  sergeidave: Horses gone wild!! Amazing game! This reminded me a bit of one of Anand's games in which he too nuked black's king with knights... awesome stuff.
Apr-21-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  sergeidave: Ahhh... I found the game I was referring to. The positions are not quite that similar, but what makes them similar is the way the knights go kamikaze, one from the left side then immediately after, the other knight catapults itself from the right... Anand vs Ponomariov, 2002
Apr-06-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  Travis Bickle: Beautiful finish! Like a military battle plan.. The grunts (knights) attack in a crossfire & the Bishop (artillery is waiting to level the King & his Kingdom... ; P
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 4)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 4 OF 4 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Chess as an art form. Part 1
by hatter81
mooie combinaties
from Roemer's favorite games by Roemer
sniupy's favorite games
by sniupy
IGM Bent Larsen
by 64rutor
d4 : Catalan Opening
by ISeth
32.? (Thursday, May 13)
from POTD Queen Pawn by takchess
from this one I'm not sure
from Games I submitted by nikolaas
32.? (Friday, April 20)
from Puzzle of the Day 2012 by Phony Benoni
English 1. c4.. any, g3
by awe1
Mooie combinatie 30. ... Tc8
from Prisma Schaakboek 8 by FRoeten
"Larsen's Selected Games" by Bent Larsen
by hakkepof
136 (31.?)
from Mittelspiel mit dem Läufer auf dem Feld b2, Haas by Chessdreamer
32.? (May 13, 2004)
from Thursday Puzzles, 2004-2010 by Phony Benoni
#1063 ct-RT
from Checkmates-Knight and Bishop by takchess
The QGD/Slav/Semi-Slav
by Zhbugnoimt
Calvary attack!
from Chess is art by geodram73
Game 52
from Modern Chess Brilliancies (Evans) by Qindarka
GotD 2010/09/14 "Great Dane": 9.Bb2 30.Rc4 (threatens 32.Qc3)
from The Double-Double, or Fork of Weight 2 by Gilmoy
31 ... fxe6 32 Qc3!, double attack on loose c8-rook, g7-square
from DOUBLE ATTACKS by notyetagm


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC