Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
G K Sandiford vs Raymond Keene
Dulwich College (1961), ?
Nimzowitsch Defense: Scandinavian. Advance Variation (B00)  ·  0-1


Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 5 times; par: 52 [what's this?]

Annotations by Raymond Keene.      [407 more games annotated by Keene]

explore this opening
find similar games 18 more G K Sandiford/Keene games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: At the top of the page we display the common English name for the opening, followed by the ECO code (e.g. "B00"). The ECO codes are links that take you to opening pages.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
Oct-08-04  Leviathan: The game is very ingenious and Ray's notes are pleasant and instructive.

I like this line of the Nimzowitsch, I'll try to learn something more about it :)

Dec-11-04  buscher07: Yes, thanks for the notes.
Mar-22-05  KibitzerX: <Ray Keene> Another well played game! I really like how you explicitly annotate your games. Is this how you are thinking when you play?

("i.e. 28 ♖xc6 ♕d5+ leads to checkmate, while after 28 ♖b5 ♘e7 [28...♘xd4] White also loses control of the long light-squared diagonal. ")

Or is it less formal sounding? Also at what move are most grandmaster games out of the "book" (or prescribed theory)? Respectfully - kibitzerX -

Mar-22-05  Shams: interesting. there are 11 games in the cg db after 3...f6 and black scores pretty well. apparently 4.f4 is not best: Opening Explorer
Jul-20-05  britny rules: i watched this game bing played
Premium Chessgames Member
  ray keene: <britney rules> were you at dulwich college when i played this game?

thanks for other comments-theres not so much theory on this line -when i played the game i only knew a few games by nimzowitsch-and yes i clearly saw the variations at the end as stated.

Jul-21-05  Montreal1666: <ray keene:> Brilliant game Mr. Keene. Thanks for the annotations. This game can be used as an example for anti-computer style. I wish Adams had looked at these kind of games before taking on Hydra.
Oct-11-05  schnarre: <ray keene> Very instructive! Have you perchance written a work on this defense?
Premium Chessgames Member
  ray keene: yes i co wrote a book on 1..nc6 v everything with byron jacobs-a complete defence for black i think it was called-not sure its still in print
Oct-14-05  schnarre: <ray keene> When was that approximately, if I may ask? (Would it have been printed on this side of the Atlantic?)
Premium Chessgames Member
  ray keene: published by batsford in the uk-- i am sure there was a usa edition too-a complete defence for black was definitely the title by keene and jacobs
Oct-14-05  schnarre: <ray keene> My thanks! I shall search for a copy when I am able.

Apr-18-06  TenFeetTall: Well, once again, this is certainly
remarkable play for a CHILD to be
conducting. Some people go on to
become Grandmasters, while others
are left in the starting blocks, I suppose.
Dec-29-08  YoungEd: I had never seen 3. ...f6 before, and it's unexpectedly hard to meet! As GM Keene notes, White's Q-bishop is doomed to a pretty bad state after f4. I wonder if trying to protect the e-pawn on move 4 with Bb5 might be better. I agree with <Montreal1666> that the notes are helpful; I find prose explanations more useful and interesting than just variations.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2018, Chessgames Services LLC