chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Hameed Mansour Ali Kadhi vs Nigel Short
FIDE World Championship Knockout Tournament (2004), Tripoli LBA, rd 11, Jun-19
Scotch Game: Classical. Intermezzo Variation (C45)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 1 more H M A Kadhi/Short game
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Premium members can see a list of all games that they have seen recently at their Game History Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Jun-19-04  shr0pshire: Short plays a very boring game. Both players trade down to an endgame which I think is a horrible strategy for white. Nigel Short is definately going to win against a foreign master in an equal endgame 8 times out of ten.

Nigel played very safe, and let his endgame knowledge carry him to the victory.

White should be flagellated for this poor plan.

I dont' think that this game is up the 2700 level that nigel's rating says he should be playing at.

Jun-19-04  dragon40: <shr0pshire> I agree, but let's also look at it from Nigel's point of view...he might be marshalling his strength for the tougher batles to come. I defnitely can understand his thinking if that is what he is doing, though I do not necessarily agree with it! He won which is what he wanted to do, especially with the BLACK pieces which almost guarantees him going to the next round:)
Jun-19-04  shr0pshire: Agreed, I was just looking for a stronger showing from Nigel Short, but whatever gets the win is the most important. And if he wants to save his strength then so be it.

However white should still be beaten (flagellated) for his poor plan of trading off pieces, and letting Short trade off pieces.

Jun-19-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  Gypsy: White should not loose endgames like that. (In fact, White position seems the one with some initial winning chances.) Where did White go wrong? For openers, 21.Rxe8 Rxe8 22.Kd2 was preferable to the retreat 21.Rd1. Second, the push b3, c4, bxc4, c5, cxb6 is more than dubious. And so on. Short's concluding manuever is very nice.
Jun-19-04  marcus13: I have an important think to explain. It is not important how you win a game, the important is that you don't lose. To beat someone fastly you need cooperatrion from your opponent. If your opponnent doesn'T do any mistake you won't be able to win. The way you win the game only matter for spectator.
Jun-20-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  Chessical: <Gypsy> Perhaps you are a liitle too hard on Ali Kadhi.

Having played <34.Rf2>, why not continue: <35.f5> gxf5 36.Rxf5 Nd6 37.Rh5 Re7 38.a4; it is hard to see how Short would win.

Jun-20-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  acirce: <Nigel played very safe> I don't think that sounds like a safe strategy.... the risk of drawing was very big.
Jun-20-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  Gypsy: <Chessical: <Gypsy> Perhaps you are a liitle too hard on Ali Kadhi. Having played <34.Rf2>, why not continue: <35.f5> gxf5 36.Rxf5 Nd6 37.Rh5 Re7 38.a4; it is hard to see how Short would win.> Oh I absolutely aggree <Chessical>, I was actually trying to give the guy a break, yesterday, and decided against posting more about places where he was lost for the right plan.

Lets return back to the position after the move 20: Both kings are on the Q-side; White has 3:2 pawn majority on the K-side; Black has 4:3 pawn majority on the K-side; and the rooks are cuting off the kings and at least one pair will exchange on the central files. Under such circumstances, I believe, it is White who has good winning(!) chances. Moreover, White has a simple strategy to play: Mainly, keep K-side pawns at home and march forward the Q-side pawns. (It may win, it may draw, but it shall not loose!) So, as you see, I completely aggree with your suggestions.

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
Round 1, Match 5, Game 1
from WCC Index [FIDE 2004 World Championship] by iron maiden
+2 -0 =0 vs. Kadhi (FIDE WCh, rd.1)
from Match Short! by amadeus


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2018, Chessgames Services LLC