chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Viktor Korchnoi vs Garry Kasparov
Herceg Novi blitz (1983), ?
Tarrasch Defense: Classical. Carlsbad Variation (D34)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 49 times; par: 30 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 42 more Korchnoi/Kasparov games
sac: 19...Rxe3 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Games that have been used in game collections will have a section at the bottom which shows collections which include it. For more information, see "What are Game Collections?" on our Help Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Mar-16-05  Backward Development: Wow! What a game! They'd only fight like this in blitz. Incredible.
Mar-16-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <backward development> . . . or at an Olympiad.

Korchnoi vs Kasparov, 1982

Mar-16-05  Backward Development: oh yeah, I forgot about that game. Nevertheless, this game is exceedingly complicated and fighting, no doubt about that.
Mar-16-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  acirce: I assume White lost on time if the game score and result is correct?
Mar-16-05  aw1988: No, black is winning.
Mar-17-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: <aw1988: No, black is winning.>

I don't see the win. What if White plays to double rooks on the a-file?

For example, 28. Re6 a4 29. R6e7 Qb2 30. Ra7 a3 31. Rf4 Qd2 32. Rfa4.

Mar-17-05  aw1988: I am not really talking about variations, more ideas... black can surely promote the a-pawn eventually without reaching the 50-move-rule.
Mar-17-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  acirce: <I am not really talking about variations, more ideas...> So what is the idea if White plays like <beatgiant> suggested to stop the promotion plan? "Black can surely..." is no argument, not that you pretended it was, of course.

The final position clearly looks drawn to me, but even if there is a black win hidden somehow it wouldn't exactly be the kind of situation where you resign in blitz. That was what I meant as well.

Mar-18-05  aw1988: I'm sorry, that was stupidity on my fault... I should have analyzed a variation without question.

Now, after 28. Re6, instead of your a4 let me alter this: 28...Qd1+ 29. Kf2 Qd2+, and black should have a clear edge, if not winning.

But instead of 24...Rc7, black could have played 24...Qxe2!, winning.

Mar-18-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: <aw1988>
<I am not really talking about variations, more ideas>

But I also was talking about ideas. There's an obvious idea for Black: <promote the a-pawn>. But White has a counter-idea: <double rooks on the a-file>, which wins the a-pawn and thus prevents Black's idea.

I also haven't analyzed much, so I don't claim best play for the line I posted. But given that we have two different ideas, you are right that only an analysis can settle it.

On the suggested 28. Re6 Qd1+ 29. Kf2 Qd2+, White must reply 30. Kg1. Then Black can try 30...Qc1+ 31. Rf1 Qb2 32. Rf7 a4 33. Ra6, but I still don't see a way to prevent White from doubling rooks on the a-file and winning the a-pawn.

Could you explain why you think <black should have a clear edge, if not winning>?

Mar-19-05  aw1988: I will get back to you tomorrow, I am very tired right now.
Mar-19-05  eyalbd: Looks like a loss on time. No one would resign in this posision especially in blitz
Mar-29-05  Backward Development: The ending is drawn.

I say that after analyzing it with Fritz for 2<!> hrs. It was very instructive. Unfortunatly, it was also hideously long; far too long for this page. If I ever get a webpage, maybe I'll post the analysis for study. Basically, I did it by a straight line from the position with multiple variations. Then I did it positionally<the g and h-pawn ending, the g and h-pawns with the 2 rooks and queen, the 2 rooks and queen w g-pawns, the 2 rooks and queen w h-pawns, etc.> I would suggest someone to do it themselves for a very instructive experience. I am so burned out now though. I almost fell asleep<!!> doing it. ugh...

Nov-04-09  holy tramp: This game is sadly beyond my capacity to comprehend; a) I don't understand why white resigns, and b) I just played this game on guess-the-move and took my worse beating ever (scoring a 25 against a par score of 34). Jesus I hate being such a patzer. Leaving Kasparov's mystifying queenside maneuvers alone for the moment, can someone PLEASE explain the white loss?! Thank you in advance.
Sep-05-17  RookFile: He must have lost on time.
Sep-05-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: <Mar-16-05 acirce: I assume White lost on time>

<Mar-17-05 beatgiant: I don't see the win>

<Mar-19-05 eyalbd: Looks like a loss on time>

<Mar-29-05 Backward Development: The ending is drawn. I say that after analyzing it with Fritz for 2<!> hrs.>

<Sep-05-17 RookFile: He must have lost on time.>

The answer, my friend, is blowin' in the wind, the answer is blowin' in the wind.

Oct-30-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  sachistu: The score is as given in the British Chess Magazine 1983, p.535, The ending description is as follows..."The position is drawish, but Korchnoi lost material by a blunder and then lost on time'.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: BLITZ (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Tarrasch Defense: Classical. Carlsbad Var (D34) 0-1 Blitz
from GK Collection on the move to Fredthebear's den by fredthebear
oh Krap
from The year of my birth by Lipsome
IQP !
by Xmas elf
British Chess Magazine 1983, p.535
from Published Games by Year and Unconfirmed Source 4 by fredthebear
Korchnoi-Kasparov blitz!
from Backward Development's highlighted games. by Backward Development
QGD/Slav/Semi-Slav #2
by Zhbugnoimt
Game collection: 101
by cgrob
Bookmarked games
by Cushion
51a2 Black IQP on d5
by whiteshark
Fascinating game
from Tarrasch Defense Rules! by nakul1964
Kasparov The Killer!!
by Zhbugnoimt
Fascinating game
from Tarrasch Defense Rules! by manselton
Kasparov The Killer!!
by chezstartz
52a_Middlegames - -> The Q vs RBP thing
by whiteshark
Fascinating game
from Tarrasch Defense Rules! by Eric Schiller


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC