chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

There is a clue unsolved right now on the Holiday Contest Clues Page!   [Official Contest Rules]

register now - it's free!
Wilhelm Steinitz vs John Lindsay McCutcheon
New York simul (1885)  ·  French Defense: McCutcheon Variation (C12)  ·  0-1
To move:
Last move:

explore this opening
find similar games 899 more games of Steinitz
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To flip the board (so black is on the bottom) either press F or click on the e7 square.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with the default chess viewer, please see the Pgn4web Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Mar-06-13  RookFile: I guess McCutcheon decided that one good pin deserves another.
Mar-06-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  parisattack: John Lutes in his book on the Mc says the trunk game was played in Germany, 1872, between Johannes Minckwitz and Samuel Mieses
Mar-06-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  cro777: Hartwig Cassel and Herman Helms in the American Chess Bulletin (vol. II, 1905) include a portrait of McCutcheon and remark:

"John Lindsay McCutcheon, whose name is attached to a well-known variation in the French Defense, is a Pittsburgh lawyer of means, an expert at and both lover and patron of chess, universally recognized as a prince of good fellows." McCutcheon was in his 40s when he died.

W. John Lutes in his book "French Defense: McCutcheon Variation" (Chess Enterprises, Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, 1991) provides a historical introduction, not only to the McCutcheon Variation, but to the French Defence as a whole.

Mar-06-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  cro777: "The true basis for the discovery of the McCutcheon Variation of the French Defense .... goes far beyond the simple moves employed on the chess board." (John Lutes)
Mar-06-13  thomastonk: <cro777> Thank you. I have done a lot of research recently on the man and his variation, but I haven't found a reference for this early date.

<parisattack> Thank you. I know Lutes' book as you know (see W John Lutes). The game is J Minckwitz vs S Mieses, 1872: it is a Winawer, and after a few moves a position is reached, which could also result from a McCutcheon. It was Rolf Schwarz in 1967 who presented it as an early McCutcheon, but it isn't a stem game of 4.. ♗b4.

<cro777, parisattack> Lutes is one of the authors who suggests that McCutcheon applied the line already "as early as the 1870s" (see p 53).

Mar-06-13  thomastonk: <cro777> Thank you again. But these quotes do not establish that McCutcheon tried his line already in the 1870s, or do they?
Mar-06-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  cro777: <thomastonk> Of course, but that was not my intention. These quotes offer some additional information. Thanks for the feedback.
Mar-06-13  thomastonk: <cro777> It wasn't my itention to criticize you or these sources. My interest is focused only to this early date, which is (to my knowledge at least) not confirmed by any contemporary source or, say, a later statement by McCutcheon himself.
Mar-06-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  parisattack: There is 'J.L.MacCutcheon: A Note' in Hardings French: MacCutcheon and Advance Lines. Interesting reading but doesn't add much to the issue at hand.

I don't remember seeing anything at all in Eades book regarding origins of the line.

Mar-06-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  cro777: <thomastonk> I understand your doubt regarding these claims. Lutes gives as his evidence, supporting an early 1870s use of the variation, a comment by Tartakover and Dumont in the book "500 Master Games of Chess" (first published 1952), but they did offer no citation to back their claim.
Mar-07-13  thomastonk: <parisattack> I have copies of Harding's and Eade's books as well, and I agree.

<cro777> Thank you again. I didn't had an opportunity to consult this book, but I knew I have to. Once I have seen it as a reference for the wrong claim that the line has been first played in the Anglo-American cable matches (it was the man who played). This wrong claim was first published in "Deutsche Schachzeitung" and "Wiener Schachzeitung" in the late 1890s. These journals are typical Tartakower sources, I think, but they are no primary sources for American Chess 20 years earlier.

Mar-07-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  cro777: <thomastonk> More I think about it I'm beginning to believe that Tartakower's comment might be the primary source (not evidence) of that claim.
Mar-07-13  thomastonk: <cro777> A simple clarification: "primary source" is a technical term used in historical research to describe original material. Information for which the writer has no personal knowledge is not "primary", but instead "secondary". So, for the origins of the McCutcheon line, Tartakower is a secondary source in this sense, and the DSZ and the WSZ, too.

Would it be possible for you to quote Tartakower's and Dumont's text here. That would be very much appreciated.

Mar-07-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  cro777: <thomastonk> Regrettably I don't have the book. Thanks for the clarification of technical terms. It seems to me that Tartakower's comment inspired other authors. I used the term "primary" in that sense.
Mar-07-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  parisattack: Tart writes in 500 to the above game -

"This counter-pin, which disdains the adverse threat of 5. P-K5, and seeks to transfer the weight of the battle to White;s QB3 is a good example of Black fighting for the initiative.

"The idea was conceived by McCutcheon in the early 'seventies and since then the greatest masters have failed to prove it unsound."

Mar-07-13  thomastonk: <parisattack: "The idea was conceived by McCutcheon in the early 'seventies ..."> Thanks a lot! I admit to be surprised: not only the seventies, but even the early seventies. I am speechless.
Mar-07-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  cro777: I was also amazed by the fact that McCutheon was 15 years old at that time.
Mar-07-13  thomastonk: <cro777> If you look at my post from Jan-28-13 at John Lindsay McCutcheon 's page, you will see that even an earlier date is possible.
Mar-07-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  cro777: <thomastonk: The "Philadelphia Evening Bulletin" from November 15, 1867 presents a Kieseritsky Gambit played in New York between Mr. Delmar and Mr. McCutcheon. This could be an early game of Eugene Delmar, but probably the second player is another McCutcheon. Does anybody have any additional information?>

Interesting. According to Neil Brennen (McCutcheon: The Man and His Moves), when and where McCutcheon learned chess is unknown.

Mar-07-13  thomastonk: <cro777> I know Brennen's article, too. But let me talk about this game from 1867. Imagine for a moment that Delmar's opponent is a 10 year old boy from Pittsburgh, who plays in New York. And - I did not mention this in the earlier post - this boy wins the game in style and he even announces a mate in 4. Then, I am sure, the fact that a prodigy won this game would have been known. But instead the winner is simply called "Mr. McCutcheon".
Mar-07-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  cro777: <thomastonk> According to <Wild Bill> it was Mr. Mkrtchian. (Just kidding)

<Wild Bill: MacCutcheon was actually Armenian. His real name was John Lindsay Mkrtchian.>

Mar-07-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  parisattack: <thomastonk: <parisattack: "The idea was conceived by McCutcheon in the early 'seventies ..."> Thanks a lot! I admit to be surprised: not only the seventies, but even the early seventies. I am speechless.>

Tartakower was known more for his writing being interesting than accurate. :)

It is often difficult to find or even decide on a trunk or stem game for a variation. Criteria vary. If it is the first reasonably well known player to use it then (for example) the Sveshnikov Sicilian would be the Larsen Sicilian as he played it against Olafsson in 1958.

But based on this game I am comfortable that this is indeed the McCutcheon variation.

Mar-08-13  thomastonk: <parisattack> I have read a lot Tartakower ("Die Hypermoderne Schachpartie", "Glanzpartien 1905-1930" and many of his articles in WSZ), and fortunately he doesn't wrote like a historian. My impression on his inaccurancies was always that he new the details, but he didn't want to bore the reader mentioning all the details. This case seems to be different.

I don't consider this early date as a stem game problem, because I expect that an earlier game would be mentioned anyway.

Sep-05-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  jnpope: <thomastonk: The "Philadelphia Evening Bulletin" from November 15, 1867 presents a Kieseritsky Gambit played in New York between Mr. Delmar and Mr. McCutcheon. This could be an early game of Eugene Delmar, but probably the second player is another McCutcheon. Does anybody have any additional information?>

E. McCutcheon of New York?
http://www.chessarch.com/excavation...

Sep-05-13  thomastonk: <jnpope> Thank you for the hint and also for your great work at chessarch.com!

Meanwhile I know that the "Mr McCutcheon" from 1867 is not J.L.McCutcheon, which was my main interest back then. I have no proof that "Mr McCutcheon" is E.McCutcheon, but I have found at least half a dozen games of the latter against strong opponents, all played between 1871 and 1874.

E.McCutcheon appears also here: http://www.edochess.ca/players/p492..., but so far haven't seen why van Winsen claims that E.McCutcheon played the Clipper tournament and no other McCutcheon.

If anybody is interested in chess-playing McCutcheons, then please feel free to drop me a note in my forum (or send an email).

< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>

A free online guide presented by Chessgames.com
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other users.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: EXHIBITION (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
This namesake opening KO's Steinitz himself!
from Namesake openings. by just a kid
Simul upsets
by GrahamClayton
G251
from 500MGC2 by morwa
Game 251
from 500 Master Games of Chess II by suenteus po 147
dannieray's favorite games
by dannieray
Bxf6 line, opposite castle, steinitz stunned by attackin pieces
from French McCutcheon for Black by prime rib
===MacCutcheon Variation (C12g)=== Note 6. Bxf6:
from French Defense: MacCutcheon Variation by ratso
6. Bxf6
from French McCutcheon by Buckle1851
The McCutcheon KO's the world champ in its first outing.
from Fire Baptisms by Nasruddin Hodja
French McCutcheon
by geordieray


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | advertising | contact us
Copyright 2001-2014, Chessgames Services LLC
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies