|Nov-13-05|| ||Autoreparaturwerkbau: All i wonder is, how sound all the sacs are?! I don't believe white put the finest effort. If all sacs ARE sound, then Planinc is far wizard-ier as Tal.|
|Nov-13-05|| ||TheAlchemist: Tal's sacs weren't all completely sound either, but still very hard to defend against.|
|Nov-14-05|| ||nescio: As it happens, Tal was also a participant in this tournament. He met Planinc in the first round and we all expected a splendid combinative duel, but Tal proved to be by far the superior strategist:
A Planinc vs Tal, 1973
As for Planinc's sacrifices in this game, I have never found a refutation. I espcially like the moves 13...b5! and 15...Bf8. White would have done better to reject the rook on a8, but Black is still better after 17.Qd2 Nxc6.
|Sep-17-06|| ||ToTheDeath: 18. Ne4! refutes the attack. Then 18... Re2+ 19. Qxe2 Rxe2 20. Kxe2 leaves White with too much material for the queen, and 18... Qa5+ is met with 19. Nd2 c4 20. O-O! Rxd2 21. Qg4 |
Black was not obligated to sac the rook. 16... Nxc6 17. dxc6 Ba6 leaves him with good compensation in all lines (White can't castle).
|Sep-01-12|| ||whiteshark: Wasn't planning on going for a run today, but those cops came out of nowhere.|
Spot an error? Please
submit a correction slip
and help us eliminate database mistakes!
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply.
Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous,
and 100% free--plus, it
entitles you to features otherwise unavailable.
Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should
Please observe our posting guidelines:
- No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
- No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
- No personal attacks against other members.
- Nothing in violation of United States law.
- No posting personal information of members.
See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.
NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page.
This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or
this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.|
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)
your profile |
Premium Membership |
Kibitzer's Café |
Biographer's Bistro |
new kibitzing |
Tournament Index |
Player Directory |
World Chess Championships |
Opening Explorer |
Guess the Move |
Game Collections |
ChessBookie Game |
Chessgames Challenge |
privacy notice |
Copyright 2001-2017, Chessgames Services LLC