Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Stephen Gordon vs John Emms
"Flash Gordon" (game of the day Oct-25-2007)
Smith & Williamson British Championship (2004), Scarborough ENG, rd 2, Aug-03
Trompowsky Attack: Classical Defense. Big Center Variation (A45)  ·  1-0


explore this opening
find similar games 362 more games of Emms
sac: 22.Rc5 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
Premium Chessgames Member
  Chessical: Gordon's <22.Rc5!?> is an enterprising Petrosian-like sac of the exchange. It was an especially principled move to give up material for positional pressure against a grandmaster.

I cannot, however, understand Emm's <25...f5> as the threat of Nf6 has not yet matured as he has Kh8.

Premium Chessgames Member
  An Englishman: Good Evening: This looks like one of Nimzowitsch's wins using the Advance Variation vs. the French Defense, and indeed while playing over the game, I had doubts about 10...d5. However, I know almost no Tromp theory, so 10...d5 might be best, and the move I would have preferred, 10...d6, might be virtually refuted.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Infin1ty: I agree with chessical that RC5 is an almost petrosian like sac, I don't believe, though, that it's an instantly winning sac.

f5 looks like a critical inaccuracy. Agreed, black is almost in zugzwang but like chessical says, before f5 is played, the threat Nf6 seems to land on concrete. Being already an exchange down, white is not in the position to prospect.

In my opinion black should have slowplayed. Maybe constructions with black lifting the c-file rook over the bishop and through b5 getting the bishop on a better diagonal and the rooks doubled behind the 'passed' pawn. I believe he has possibilities to work towards a system where the move ...d4 brings white sufficient issues to, in the end, take the draw.

Premium Chessgames Member
  JG27Pyth: Anyone else find this sort of resignation annoying?

Yes, black has a bad game from here.

He's about to undergo some rather unpleasant penetration from the white queen on the kingside but when the smoke clears I don't think black will be more than two pawns down and with both queens still on the board -- awful? yes. Over? not imo. ... black should be clawing for a draw IMO, and he probably won't get it, but it isn't certain he won't get it, not yet. I know high level chess is mentally exhausting and it's really unpleasant to play out losing postions... but if you are a titled player shouldn't you be held to a high standard?

Baseball fans understand... this resignation, to me, is like when you hit a grounder to short-stop. We expect you to run until you're out. (*I'm a Mets fan -- I guess Jose Reyes is _still_ on my mind).

Or am I totally wrong and there's some forced win here that I've missed?

Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: An I correct to assume that when black moves his attacked rook that white will force a win by Qe5+?

This game has the odd theme of a reverse battery of queen and bishop. When the queen is on the line,the force is stronger but when she moves away,the attack is MORE effective. I would compare it to replacing a light bulb with a lazer beam. The light may be brightermbut the lazer will burn holes in you.

Oct-25-07  faulenzer: <JG27Pyth>: Given that the game ends before black's 40th, perhaps he lost on time.
Premium Chessgames Member
  zdigyigy: <Jg27Pyth>: I disagree. I have no problem with this resignation. This game is over, especially between two masters. Find me a line that does not lose at least an exchange and I will beg your pardon.
Oct-25-07  Riverbeast: Can't they find a better name than the 'Big Center Variation'?
Oct-25-07  pawnofdoom: Probably not. At least a name like "Big Center" is more creative than "King's Pawn" opening and "Uncommon" opening
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
October 25: Flash Gordon
from Game of the Day 2007 by Phony Benoni
Game of the Oct-25-07
from Games of the day 5 by Herkus
Q. Voorstander's nagespeelde partijen
by Q. Voorstander

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2018, Chessgames Services LLC