chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Garry Kasparov vs Vladimir Kramnik
Siemens Giants (1999), Frankfurt, rd 8, Jul-01
Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer. Neo-Modern Variation Early deviations (B66)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 23 times; par: 43 [what's this?]

NOTE: You are using our new chess viewer, "Olga." For more info see the Olga Quickstart Guide. You can switch back to the old viewer (pgn4web) from the pulldown menu below. If you have questions or suggestions see our Olga chessforum.

explore this opening
find similar games 121 more Kasparov/Kramnik games
sac: 35.Rxd5 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Some games have photographs. These are denoted in the game list with the icon.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jul-28-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  BishopofBlunder: Complete moron here...
Couldn't find the right move with a road map!
Actually, I did consider 35. Rxd5, but couldn't see a clear advantage... completely missed the knight fork.
Jul-28-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheAlchemist: <BishopofBlunder> At least you honored the 2nd half of your handle :-)))
Jul-28-05  Granite: <BishopofBlunder> I used to miss problems like this as well, thankfully having worked on every puzzle here for the last 7 months which has sharpened my understanding considerably. My advice - always consider every possible capture even if it seems silly and completely off balance. The reason is because captures force the opponent to recapture to maintain equality, which is a gain of Time and also compels them to respond making it a forcing move. Even a pawn for a rook can be a good trade if you get enough Time from it!

Also, try to picture the 'what if' scenerios. In solving this one I first noticed that the rook was the only defender of the queen which is attacked, and that if I could remove the e6 pawn I'd have a discovery on the king. Combining those two ideas led me to deeply calculate the move Rxd5 since it seemed promising, and indeed it was.

Also, I pay attention to Patzer2's regular commentary on tactics puzzles, he tends to break them down into components you can learn to look for in future tactics which I've found very useful for solving puzzles like this one. For example he's often brought the 'removing the defender' tactic to my attention until eventually I started to notice it puzzles and my own games, and subsequently improved the quality of my play. Hopefully with a bit of time and some attention you'll start getting the harder puzzles too - I know the first Saturday puzzle I ever solved was a huge thrill!

Jul-29-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  Richard Taylor: <Granite> right on! I solved this but I was wary as i ofen miss a counter attack but in this case I saw "everything" as they say in the trade -I would have played OTB <sahrpnovas> "complete moron" comment is silly as no one "gets" these things immediately and its like doing the crossword - you might not be able to come up with a word that you would have "instantly" the previous day - I assume sharpnova is being humoresque - player who has been playing as long as myself hasnt so many excusse but on here there are people of all levels of ability and playing time etc etc but I am assuming sharpnova is joking
Jul-29-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  Richard Taylor: <sharpnova> was indeed joculating as I see above -but some players who are just kind of starting out would find some of these tactics dificult so the joke is ok but some people might be upset by such a comment (they might think that they are hopeless at chess -forgetting that most of us have studied the game forever - unless there are some Tals or Fischers - (and THEY werent slack about their chess studies!) amongst us) ....for most of us <Dan Ross> we only "get" these quickly as we have studied tactics for ages...Patzer has that huge encylcopedia of tactics and Reinfeld's (1001 combos) book - which I would like to have - a chess player (even a "casual" player) cant get enough tactics training
Jul-29-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  BishopofBlunder: <TheAlchemist: <BishopofBlunder> At least you honored the 2nd half of your handle>

Oh yes, I rarely dishonor it. I deserve to wear the title of "KingofBlunder" but I preferred the alliteration. Besides, this way people can just call me "BoB" for short :)

Jul-29-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  BishopofBlunder: <Granite> Thanks for the advice and the encouragement. I really don't mind not solving the puzzles too much (unless it's Monday). I am only a casual player, but I have learned alot since coming to this site. I am generally much better at puzzles than I am OTB. Over the board I really am the Bishop of Blunder. Oh well, I'm getting better. :)
Jul-29-05  alexandrovm: <"complete moron" comment is silly> I got it in two seconds! <that's a silly comment as well :)>
Jul-29-05  PawnField: Take a look at this

Game Collection: Kramnik Miniatures

Sep-24-05  Teacher X: Nice game by Kasparov.
May-10-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  notyetagm: One of the best played rapid games I have ever seen.
Sep-05-06  Zorts: Excellent Kasparov game but how did he manage to keep Kramnik from Castling?
Sep-05-06  MrPatzer: <Zorts: Excellent Kasparov game but how did he manage to keep Kramnik from Castling?> The White bishop on A3 is blocking Kramnik from castling.
Sep-15-06  Tenderfoot: 35. Rxd5 is pretty devastating, did Kramnick not see the discover check that was to follow? It seems like a pretty natural continuation of that line, and if he did, I don't see why he didn't resign one move earlier.
Oct-01-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  notyetagm: Kasparov was in simply unbelievable form in 1999.
Oct-07-07  Thecheckmater: 34...Qc7??Terrible,34...Rg8 is much better
Oct-07-07  Thecheckmater: <Tenderfoot>If 35...Rxd5 then 36.Qxd7
Oct-07-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  notyetagm: One of my fav Kasparov games.
Oct-07-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  notyetagm: Position after 34 ... ♕d8-c7?:


click for larger view

Black (Kramnik) has just blundered, being too eager to trade queens with his king trapped in the center on e8.

Here Kasparov (White) won on the spot by beginning a tremendous combination with 35 ♖d1x♗d5!.

Position after 35 ♖d1x♗d5!:


click for larger view

The tactical point is that the Black d5-bishop is not really defended. Since the Black d7-rook is tied down <DEFENDING> the Black c7-queen (else ♕f4x♕c7) and the Black e6-pawn must <BLOCK> the e-file that the White e1-rook and Black e8-king are on, there is no Black piece or pawn available to meet the threat of 35 ♖d1x♗d5!.

Both of the Black pieces that -appear- to defend the Black d5-bishop (Black e6-pawn, Black c7-rook) actually have more important defensive duties to perform, i.e., both the of these defenders are <OVERWORKED>.

Jun-21-09  WhiteRook48: well wasn't Black lost anyway?
Jul-18-11  koleos: notyetagm, yes, kasparov was in great shape in 1999, save in cases when he was drawing back his moves in the games, like he did in the game versus J. Polgar, which was recorded by serbian journalist and chess IM Dimitrije Bjelica.
Jul-18-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  plang: <notyetagm, yes, kasparov was in great shape in 1999, save in cases when he was drawing back his moves in the games>

The incident you are referring to was in 1994 not 1999. As far as I know it is the only incident of this type in his career. Why you are bringing it up here I have no idea.

Aug-04-11  koleos: plang, I bring it up here and everywhere, since this you call "incident", I call scandal. It is of minor important when exactly it happened. Drawing back a move is extremely incorrect. Kasparov was W.Champion and he did it in the middle of the game vs J.Polgar. Such behavior was illegal and done against a lady. What else should I write here to explain that it was scandal not only "incident" ? This "incident" speaks itself of what kind a man Kasparov is.
Aug-04-11  Blunderdome: <I bring it up here and everywhere>

It's completely off-topic here. I suggest Judit Polgar vs Kasparov, 1994.

Aug-05-11  koleos: blunderdome, thanks for the link
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 3)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>

Kasparov on Kasparov: Part I
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: RAPID (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
White sacrifices a exchange to create a killer check on the e.
from Kolty's Single, Double, & TRIPLE KP Attack by fredthebear
richter rauzer
by gambitfan
Complex favorites
by Whitehat1963
White sacrifices a exchange to create a killer check on the e.
from Sicilian as White by Bigc08
35 Rd1xBd5! Black d7-rook defends c7-queen, cannot defend d5
from OVERLOADED! Compiled by Baby Hawk by fredthebear
Kasparov cruches threw
from Instructive games collected by Thomas and Sven by BoardLord
In cruise control.
from Concentration of Force by sevenseaman
35.? (July 28, 2005)
from Thursday Puzzles, 2004-2010 by Phony Benoni
Sicillian Defense
by Zhbugnoimt
Kasparov Beating Kramnik
by Cosmo
try to picture the 'what if' scenerios
from Sicilians of All Sorts of Sicilians by fredthebear
try to picture the 'what if' scenerios
from K Players by fredthebear
senakash's favorite games
by senakash
Instructional Remedies Vs. Sicilian
by southpawjinx
Kasparov smothers king behind queen and rook!
from Slick Combinations by greystar69
nice B66 sac: 35.Rxd5!
from Kasparov! by larrewl
Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer. Neo-Modern deviations (B66) 1-0 Pin
from Pins Ins and Outs, All About Pins ECO B by fredthebear
35.? (Thursday, July 28)
from Puzzle of the Day 2005 by Phony Benoni
35 RxBd5! Black d7-rook cannot defend both c7-queen, d5-bishop
from Defending one square is a full-time job by notyetagm
!
from kasparov best games by brager
plus 29 more collections (not shown)


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | advertising | contact us
Copyright 2001-2017, Chessgames Services LLC